Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: June 2012

2 - The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle

Summary

[T]he “rights” conception [of the rule of law] assumes that citizens have moral rights and duties with respect to one another, and political rights against the state as a whole. It insists that these moral and political rights be recognized in positive law, so that they may be enforced upon the demand of individual citizens through courts or other judicial institutions of the familiar type, so far as this is practicable. The rule of law on this conception is the ideal of rule by an accurate public conception of individual rights. It does not distinguish, as the rule-book conception does, between the rule of law and substantive justice; on the contrary it requires, as part of the ideal of law, that the rules in the rule book capture and enforce moral rights.

– Ronald Dworkin

INTRODUCTION

In popular opinion, the rule of law is essential to legitimate government. Philosophers of law do not dispute popular opinion but divide over an ambiguity in it. They agree that a legitimate government is one that, among other things, operates under the constraints of the rule of law. They disagree about whether the constraints suffice to make government to some extent legitimate. As we will soon see, this disagreement turns in part on political considerations about the role of judges in democracy. But it also turns on the debate between positivists and antipositivists about the nature of law.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Ronald Dworkin
  • Online ISBN: 9781139167109
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167109
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×