The Ethical Implications, and Practical Consequences, of Attaching Remote Telemetry Apparatus to Macaques

doi:10.1017/9781107449824.005

4 - The Ethical Implications, and Practical Consequences, of Attaching Remote Telemetry Apparatus to Macaques

from Part I - GPS for Primatologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2021

Greg Marshall and

Edited by

Christopher A. Shaffer ,

Leila M. Porter ,

Jena R. Hickey and

Nathan P. Nibbelink

Show author details

Francine L. Dolins: Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Christopher A. Shaffer: Affiliation:
Grand Valley State University, Michigan
Leila M. Porter: Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Jena R. Hickey: Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Nathan P. Nibbelink: Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The use of global positioning system (GPS) units attached to collars is becoming increasingly common in primate studies (Anderson, pers. comm.; Crofoot et al. 2014; Di Fiore & Link 2013; Dore, pers. comm.; Klegarth et al. 2017; Markham & Altmann 2008; Markham et al. 2013; Sprague et al. 2004; Stark, pers. comm.). By deploying GPS collars, researchers can gain enhanced knowledge of primate group whereabouts and overall ranging and landscape use patterns at a high resolution (Crofoot et al. 2014). The utility of these systems has greatly expanded with the increasing spatial accuracy, reliability, and mechanisms (remote data download and drop-off units) of units that facilitate reasonably low impact on study animals (Klegarth et al. 2017; Matthews et al. 2013). While these collars open up new methodological and analytic possibilities for assessing primate ranging patterns and habitat use, they also present a diverse array of technical, structural, and ethical concerns with doing so (Hebblewhite & Haydon 2010; Todd & Shah 2012)

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
Applying GIS at Varying Scales
, pp. 64 - 86

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107449824.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Society of Mammalogists. 1998. Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 1416–1431.Google Scholar

Côté, S. D., Festa-Bianchet, M., and Fournier, F. 1998. Life-history effects of chemical immobilization and radio collars on mountain goats. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 745–752.CrossRef Google Scholar

Crofoot, M. C., Norton, T. M., Lessnau, R. C., et al. 2009. Field anesthesia and health assessment of free ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus) in Panama. International Journal of Primatology 30: 125–141.Google Scholar

Crofoot, M. C., Lambert, T. D., Kays, R., and Wikelski, M. R. 2010. Does watching a monkey change its behaviour? Quantifying observer effects in habituated wild primates using automated radiotelemetry. Animal Behaviour 80: 475–480Google Scholar

Crofoot, M. C., Kays, R., Alavi, S., and Wikelski, M. 2014. Democracy or despotism? How do baboons decide? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 153: 99–100.Google Scholar

Di Fiore, A. and Link, A. 2013. Evaluating the utility of GPS collars for studies of ranging by large-bodied, arboreal, forest-dwelling primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology S56: 112.Google Scholar

ESRI. 2014. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar

Fuentes, A., Kalchik, S., Gettler, L., et al. 2008. Characterizing human–macaque interactions in Singapore. American Journal of Primatology 70: 1–5.Google Scholar

Gursky, S. 1998. Effects of radio transmitter weight on a small nocturnal primate. American Journal of Primatology 46: 145–155.Google Scholar

Hebblewhite, M. and Haydon, D. T. 2010. Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365: 2303–2312.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hilpert, A. L. and Jones, C. B. 2005. Possible costs of radio-tracking a young adult female mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) in deciduous habitat of Costa Rican tropical dry forest. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8: 227–232.Google Scholar

Jones-Engel, L. and Engel, G. A. 2009. The risks and contexts of emerging primate-borne zoonoses. Pages 52–77 in Health, Risk and Adversity. Fuentes, A. and Panter-Brick, C. (Eds.). Berghahn Books, Oxford.Google Scholar

Jones-Engel, L., Engel, G. A., Schillaci, M., et al. 2005. Primate to human retroviral transmission in Asia. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11: 1028–1035.Google Scholar

Klegarth, A. R. (2017). Measuring movement: how remote telemetry facilitates our understanding of the human–macaque interface. Pages 70–87 in Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research on the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface. Dore, K., Riley, E., and Fuentes, A. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Klegarth, A. R., Hollocher, H., Jones-Engel, L., et al. (2017). Urban primate ranging patterns: GPS-collar deployments for Macaca fascicularis and M. sylvanus. American Journal of Primatology 79. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22633.Google Scholar

Langley, R. B. 1999. Dilution of precision. GPS World. Available at: www.gpsworld.com.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, K. C. and Riley, E. P. 2013. Ethical issues in field primatology. Pages 98–107 in Ethics in the Field: Contemporary Challenges. Fuentes, A. and MacClancy, J. (Eds.). Berghahn Books, New York.Google Scholar

Markham, A. C. and Altmann, J. 2008. Remote monitoring of primates using automated GPS technology in open habitats. American Journal of Primatology 70: 1–5.Google Scholar

Markham, A. C., Guttal, V., Alberts, S. C., and Altmann, J. 2013. When good neighbors don’t need fences: temporal landscape partitioning among baboon social groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67: 875–884.Google Scholar

Matthews, A., Ruykys, L., Ellis, B., et al. 2013. The success of GPS collar deployments on mammals in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 35: 65–83.Google Scholar

Moorhouse, T. P. and MacDonald, D. W. J. 2005. Indirect negative impacts of radio-collaring: sex ratio variation in water voles. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 91–98.Google Scholar

Morton, D. B., Hawkins, P., Bevan, R., et al. 2003. Refinements in telemetry procedures: Seventh Report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement, Part A. Laboratory Animals 37, 261–299.Google Scholar

Nash, L. T. 2005. Studies of primates in the field and in captivity: similarities and differences in ethical concerns. Pages 27–48 in Biological Anthropology and Ethics: From Repatriation to Genetic Identity. Turner, T.R. (Ed.). SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Oberste, M. S., Feeroz, M. M., Maher, K., et al. 2013. Characterizing the picornavirus landscape among synanthropic nonhuman primates in Bangladesh, 2007–2008. Journal of Virology 87: 558–571.CrossRef Google Scholar

Setchell, J.M. and Curtis, D.J. (Eds.). 2010. Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sprague, D. S., Kabaya, H., and Hagihara, K. 2004. Field testing a global positioning systems (GPS) collar on a Japanese monkey: reliability of automatic GPS positioning in a Japanese forest. Primates 45: 151–154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Todd, D. E. and Shah, S. F. 2012. Assessing acute effects of trapping, handling, and tagging on the behavior of wildlife using GPS telemetry: a case study of the common brushtail possum. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 15: 189–207.Google Scholar

Tuyttens, F. A. M., MacDonald, D. W. J., and Roddam, A. W. 2002. Effects of radio-collars on European badgers (Meles meles). Journal of Zoology 257: 37–42.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.