Book contents
- Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
- Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Why Place Matters, and its Use in Primate Behavioral and Ecological Research
- Part I GPS for Primatologists
- Part II GIS Analysis in Fine-Scale Space
- Introduction
- 7 Home Range Analysis
- 8 Quantifying Resource Dispersion in Free-Ranging Bearded Sakis in Guyana
- 9 Interpreting Small-Scale Patterns of Ranging by Primates
- 10 Determining the Presence of Habitual Travel Route Networks in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) in Kutai National Park, Borneo
- 11 Finding Fruit in a Tropical Rainforest
- 12 Random Walk Analyses in Primates
- 13 The Use of Small-Scale Spatial Analysis to Evaluate Primate Behavior and Welfare in Captive Settings
- 14 The Promise of Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Models for Primatology Research
- Part III GIS Analysis in Broad-Scale Space
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
11 - Finding Fruit in a Tropical Rainforest
A Comparison of the Foraging Patterns of Two Distinct Fruit-Eating Primates Across Years
from Part II - GIS Analysis in Fine-Scale Space
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2021
Book contents
- Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
- Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Why Place Matters, and its Use in Primate Behavioral and Ecological Research
- Part I GPS for Primatologists
- Part II GIS Analysis in Fine-Scale Space
- Introduction
- 7 Home Range Analysis
- 8 Quantifying Resource Dispersion in Free-Ranging Bearded Sakis in Guyana
- 9 Interpreting Small-Scale Patterns of Ranging by Primates
- 10 Determining the Presence of Habitual Travel Route Networks in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) in Kutai National Park, Borneo
- 11 Finding Fruit in a Tropical Rainforest
- 12 Random Walk Analyses in Primates
- 13 The Use of Small-Scale Spatial Analysis to Evaluate Primate Behavior and Welfare in Captive Settings
- 14 The Promise of Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Models for Primatology Research
- Part III GIS Analysis in Broad-Scale Space
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Tamarins and chimpanzees differ in many aspects of their behavior, biology, and evolutionary history; however, both primates are heavily dependent on a diet of ripe fruits during all months of the year (reviewed in Digby et al. 2011; Stumpf 2011). In addition, previous research on cognition in tamarins and chimpanzees indicates that individuals retain spatial information concerning the location of many feeding sites (e.g., Garber 2000; Janmaat et al. 2013a; Normand et al. 2009). Since primates show a high level of site fidelity (Janmaat et al. 2009) and commonly rely on sessile food sources that are revisited many times over a limited part of the year (such as termite nests and trees producing fruits, leaves, flowers, and/or exudates), one might expect foragers to reuse a limited set of travel routes, return to previously visited feeding sites, and search for new food patches in locations nearby current feeding sites.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Spatial Analysis in Field PrimatologyApplying GIS at Varying Scales, pp. 225 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adamescu, G. S., Plumptre, A. J., Abernethy, K. A., et al. 2018. Annual cycles are the most common reproductive strategy in African tropical tree communities. Biotropica 50(3): 418–430.Google Scholar
Alverson, W., Moskovitz, D. K., Shopland, J. M. (Eds.). 2000. Rapid Biological Inventories for Conservation Action: Northwestern Pando, Bolivia. Field Museum, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ban, S. D., Boesch, C., and Janmaat, K. R. L. 2014. Taï chimpanzees anticipate revisiting high-valued fruit trees from further distances. Animal Cognition 17: 1353–1364.Google Scholar
Ban, S. D., Boesch, C., N’Guessan, A., et al. 2016. Taï chimpanzees change their travel direction for rare feeding trees providing fatty fruits. Animal Behaviour 118: 135–147.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68 : 255–278.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolani, M. P. 2013. Ranging and travelling patterns of wild chimpanzees at Kibale, Uganda: a GIS approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. and Boesch, A. 2000. The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioral Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Di Fiore, A. and Suarez, S. A. 2007. Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive and evolutionary implications. Animal Cognition 10: 317–329.Google Scholar
Digby, L. J., Ferrari, S. F., and Saltzman, W. 2011. The role of competition in cooperatively breeding species. Pages 91–107 in Primates in Perspective, 2nd edition. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S., and Stumpf, R. M. (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. J. and Barnett, A. 2008. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A. 1988. Foraging decisions during nectar feeding by tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis, Callitrichidae, Primates) in Amazonian Peru. Biotropica 20: 100–106.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A. 1989. Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis. American Journal of Primatology 19: 203–216.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A. 2000. The ecology of group movement: evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information in some primate foragers. Pages 261–298 in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. Boinski, S. and Garber, P.A. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A. in press. Primate cognitive ecology: challenges and solutions to locating and acquiring resources in social foragers. In Primate Diet and Nutrition: Needing, Finding, and Using Food. Lambert, J. E. and Rothman, J. (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A., and Porter, L. M. 2010. The ecology of exudate feeding and exudate production in Saguinus and Callimico. Pages 89–108 in The Evolution of Exudativory in Primates. Burrows, A. and Nash, L. (Eds). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Garber, P. A., and Porter, L. M. 2014. Navigating in small-scale space: the role of landmarks and resource monitoring in understanding saddleback tamarin travel. American Journal of Primatology 76: 447–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garber, P.A., Porter, L.M., Spross, J., and Di Fiore, A. 2016. Tamarins: insights into monogamous and non-monogamous single female breeding systems. American Journal of Primatology 78: 298–314.Google Scholar
Goné Bi, Z. B. 2007. Régime alimentaire des chimpanzés, distribution spatiale et phénologie des plantes dont les fruits sont consommés par les chimpanzés du Parc National de Taï, en Côte d’Ivoire. PhD Thesis, University of Cocody.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T. and Hornik, K. 2013. exactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. R package version 0.8-24. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=exactRankTests.Google Scholar
Jang, H., Boesch, C., Mundry, R., Ban, S. D., and Janmaat, K. R. L. 2019. Travel linearity and speed of human foragers and chimpanzees during their daily search for food in tropical rainforests. Scientfic Reports 9: 11066.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L. and Chancellor, R. L. 2010. Exploring new areas: how important is long-term spatial memory for mangabey (Lophocebus albigena johnstonii) foraging efficiency? International Journal of Primatology 31: 863–886.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L., Olupot, W., Chancellor, R. L., Arlet, M. E., and Waser, P. M. 2009. Long-term site fidelity and individual home range shifts in Lophocebus albigena. International Journal of Primatology 30: 443–466.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2013a. Chimpanzees use long-term spatial memory to monitor large fruit trees and remember feeding experiences across seasons. Animal Behaviour 86: 1183–1205.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L., Ban, S. D. and Boesch, C. 2013b. Taï chimpanzees use botanical skills to discover fruit: what we can learn from their mistakes. Animal Cognition 16: 851–860.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L., Polansky, L., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2014. Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 16343–16348.Google Scholar
Janmaat, K. R. L., Boesch, C., Byrne, R., et al. 2016. The spatio-temporal complexity of chimpanzee food: how cognitive adaptations can counteract the ephemeral nature of ripe fruit. American Journal of Primatology 78: 626–645.Google Scholar
Kalan, A. K. and Boesch, C. 2015. Audience effects in chimpanzee food calls and their potential for recruiting others. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69: 1701–1712.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. D., Kelly, D., Sork, V. L., et al. 2003. Dissecting components of population-level variation in seed production and the evolution of masting behavior. Oikos 102: 581–591.Google Scholar
Kouakou, C. Y., Boesch, C., and Kuehl, H. 2011. Identifying hotspots of chimpanzee group activity from transect surveys in Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27: 621–630.Google Scholar
Laden, G. T. 1992. Ethnoarchaeology and land use ecology of the Efe (pygmies) of the Ituri rain forest, Zaire: a behavioral ecological study of land use patterns and foraging behavior. PhD Thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lledo-Ferrer, Y., Pelaez, F., and Heymann, E. W. 2011. The equivocal relationship between territoriality and scent marking in wild saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). International Journal of Primatology 32: 974–991.Google Scholar
Lopez-Rebellon, N. 2010. Sex and age-based differences in antipredator behavior in saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) in the department of Pando, Bolivia. MA Thesis, DeKalb, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Milton, K. 1980. The Foraging Strategy of Howler Monkeys: A Study in Primate Economics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Nishida, T., Zamma, K., Matsusaka, T., Inaba, A., and McGrew, W. C. 2010. Chimpanzee Behavior in the Wild: An Audio-Visual Encyclopedia. Springer, Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, E., Ban, S. D., and Boesch, C. 2009. Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) remember the location of numerous fruit trees. Animal Cognition 12(6): 797–807.Google Scholar
Noser, R. and Byrne, R. W. 2015. Wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) remember single foraging episodes. Animal Cognition 18, 921–929.Google Scholar
Peñuelas, J., Filella, I., Xiaoyang, Z., et al. 2004. Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytologist 161: 837–846.Google Scholar
Polansky, L. and Boesch, C. 2013. Long-term fruit phenology and rainfall trends conflict in a West African lowland tropical rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 45: 409–535.Google Scholar
Porter, L. M. 2001. Dietary differences among sympatric Callitrichinae in northern Bolivia: Callimico goeldii, Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus. International Journal of Primatology 22: 961–992.Google Scholar
Porter, L. M. and Garber, P. A. 2013. Foraging and spatial memory in wild Weddell’s saddleback tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli) when moving between distant and out-of-sight goals. International Journal of Primatology 34: 30–48.Google Scholar
Porter, L. M., Sterr, S. M., and Garber, P. A. 2007. Habitat use and ranging behavior of Callimico goeldii. International Journal of Primatology 28: 1035–1058.Google Scholar
Porter, L. M., Erb, W. M., Saire, C. L., et al. 2015. Temporal changes in the composition of saddleback tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis weddelli) groups over time. American Association of Physical Anthropologists 156(60): 255–256.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, H., Clüver, A., Saucke, L., et al. 2014. Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition 131(1): 60–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rylands, A., Heymann, E., Matauschek, C., et al. 2016. Taxonomic review of the New World tamarins (Primates: Callitrichidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177 (4): 1003–1028.Google Scholar
Schel, A. M., Machanda, Z., Townsend, S. W., Zuberbühler, K., and Slocombe, K. E. 2013. Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Animal Behaviour 86: 955–965.Google Scholar
Stumpf, R. M. 2011. Chimpanzees and bonobos: inter- and intraspecies diversity. Pages 340–356 in Primates in Perspective, 2nd edition. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S., and Stumpf, R. M. (Eds.) Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Tecwyn, E. C., Denison, S., Messer, E. J., and Buchsbaum, D. 2017. Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition 20(2): 243–256.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1983. Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 2
- Cited by