Supported Decision-Making Theory, Research, and Practice to Enhance Self-Determination and Quality of Life
Book contents
- Supported Decision-Making
- Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series
- Supported Decision-Making
- Copyright page
- Cambridge University Press, Disability Law and Policy Series
- Contents
- Figure
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Overview
- Part II Strengths-Based Frameworks for Understanding Disability and Support Needs
- Part III Theory Underpinning Supported Decision-Making
- Part IV Applications of a Social-Ecological Framework for Supported Decision-Making
- References
- Index
- References
Foreword
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2018
Book contents
- Supported Decision-Making
- Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series
- Supported Decision-Making
- Copyright page
- Cambridge University Press, Disability Law and Policy Series
- Contents
- Figure
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Overview
- Part II Strengths-Based Frameworks for Understanding Disability and Support Needs
- Part III Theory Underpinning Supported Decision-Making
- Part IV Applications of a Social-Ecological Framework for Supported Decision-Making
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Supported Decision-MakingTheory, Research, and Practice to Enhance Self-Determination and Quality of Life, pp. xxi - xxviiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Americans with Disabilities Act (1990). P.L. 101–336, 104 Stat. 327, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 12101 et seq.Google Scholar
The Arc Position Statement on Autonomy, Decision-Making Supports, and Guardianship. www.thearc.org/who-we-are/position-statements/autonomy-decisionmakingsupportsandguardianshipGoogle Scholar
Frankfurter, F. (1951), in Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123, at 161, holding that the Attorney General violates the committee’s right to due process by listing the committee as fascist without affording the committee a right to protest the decision.Google Scholar
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (1996), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1320d et seq.Google Scholar
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), striking down Virginia’s antimiscegenation statute.Google Scholar
Mish, F. C. (1990) (ed.). Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. __ (2015), holding that same-sex couples have a constitutional liberty right to marriage.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement, ed. Kelly, E. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. R. (2009). A modest proposal in four parts. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42, 1–10.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. R. (2011). The exceptional life of Jay Turnbull: Disability and dignity in America 1967–2009. Amherst, MA: White Poppy Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, H. R., Beegle, G., & Stowe, M. J. (2001). The core concepts of disability policy affecting families of people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, H. R. & Stowe, M. J. (2001). A taxonomy for organizing the core concepts of disability policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12, 177–197.Google Scholar