Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:17:14.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Past as Authority and as Social Critic: Stabilizing and Destabilizing Functions of History in Legal Argument*

from Part III - History and Historicism in Legal History and Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

Robert W. Gordon
Robert W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

[Unlike most of the other pieces in this collection, this one was written for an audience not of lawyers and legal scholars but of historians and social scientists. It resulted from an invitation to a conference organized in 1990 by the Program in Comparative Study in Social Transformations at the University of Michigan, a remarkable group of scholars from many different disciplines. Contributors to the conference were invited to speculate on the “turn” toward historical inquiry that seemed to be common to all these disciplines. This essay was written for that conference and the revised version of it published in Terrence J. McDonald (ed.), The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences (University of Michigan Press, 1996), 339–67.]

Type
Chapter
Information
Taming the Past
Essays on Law in History and History in Law
 , pp. 282 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard. 1985. “Risk as an Arena of Struggle.” Michigan Law Review 83: 772–794.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory. 1985. “The Dead Hand and the Law of Trusts in the Nineteenth Century.” Stanford Law Review 37: 1189–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Akhil. 1991. “The Bill of Rights as a Constitution.” Yale Law Journal 100:1131–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold. 1976. Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Dianne. 1988. “Images of Violence in Labor Jurisprudence: The Regulation of Labor and Boycotts, 1894–1921.” Buffalo Law Review 37:1–117.Google Scholar
Bass, Jack. 1981. Unlikely Heroes: The Dramatic Story of the Southern Judges of the Fifth Circuit Who Translated the Supreme Court’s Brown Decision into a Revolution for Equality. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Belknap, Michael. 1977. Cold War Political Justice: The Smith Act, the Communist Party, and American Civil Liberties. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick. 1980. Race, Racism, and American Law. 2nd edn. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bell v Maryland 378 U.S. 226 (1964).Google Scholar
Benedict, Michael Les. 1985. “Laissez-Faire and Liberty: A Re-Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism.” Law and History Review 3:293–331.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1977. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald. 1994. Alternative Tracks: The Corporation and the Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1975. The Morality of Consent. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bone, Robert. 1986. “Normative Theory and Legal Doctrine in American Nuisance Law: 1850–1920.” Southern California Law Review 59:1101–1226.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel. 1953. The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert. 1990. The Tempting of America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. 1991. “A Process of Denial: Bork and Post-Modern Conservatism.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 3:263–314.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. 1978. “The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding.” Boston University Law Review 25:75–110.Google Scholar
Bridwell, Randall, and Whitten, Ralph U.. 1977. The Constitution and the Common Law. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Burns, Haywood. 1981. “From Brown to Bakke and Back: Race, Law, and Social Change in America.” Daedalus 110 (spring): 219–231.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1966. Evolution and Society: A Study in Victorian Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1974. “The ‘Village Community’ and the Uses of History in Late Nineteenth Century England.” In McKendrick, Neil, ed., Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honor of J. H. Plumb, 260–275. London: Europa.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1981. A Liberal Descent: Victorian Historians and Their Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casebeer, Kenneth. 1985. “Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: Coppage v. Kansas and At-Will Employment Revisited.” Cardozo Law Review 6:765–797.Google Scholar
Caute, David. 1978. The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge under Truman and Eisenhower. New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Harvard University, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Stephen A. 1984. “Polite Foundation: Citizenship and Common Sense in James Wilson’s Republican Theory.” Supreme Court Review 1984:359–388.Google Scholar
Conrad, Stephen A. 1988. “Metaphor and Imagination in James Wilson’s Theory of Federal Union.” Law and Social Inquiry 13:1–70.Google Scholar
Conrad, Stephen A. 1989. “James Wilson’s Assimilation of the Common-Law Mind.” Northwestern University Law Review 89:186–219.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. 1988. “Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Anti-Discrimination Law.” Harvard Law Review 101:1331–1387.Google Scholar
Crunden, Robert. 1982. Ministers of Reform: The Progressives’ Achievement in American Civilization, 1889–1920. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dawson, John P. 1968. Oracles of the Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1983. “A Common Law for Labor Relations: A Critique of the New Deal Labor Legislation.” Yale Law Journal 92:1357–1408.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1984. “In Defense of the Contract at Will.” University of Chicago Law Review 51:947–82.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1988. Reconstruction: America: Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Forbath, William. 1989. “The Shaping of the American Labor Movement.” Harvard Law Review 102:1111–1256.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian. 1963. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Alan. 1990. “Antidiscrimination Law: The View from 1989.” In Kairys, David, ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 121–150. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1985. A History of American Law. 2nd edn. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, and Ladinsky, Jack. 1967. “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents.” Columbia Law Review 67:50–82.Google Scholar
Frug, Gerald. 1980. “The City as a Legal Concept.” Harvard Law Review 93:1059–1154.Google Scholar
Garrow, David. 1986 . Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. New York: W. Morrow.Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene. 1974. Roll, Jordan, Roll. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von. 1913. Political Theories of the Middle Age, Maitland, F. W., trans. and intro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. “Critical Legal Histories.” Stanford Law Review 36:57–125.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. 1981. An Alternative to Private Property: Collective Property in the Juridical Consciousness of the Nineteenth Century, Lydia C. Cochrane, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Stephen. 1983. The Roots of Southern Populism: Yeoman Farmers and the Transformation of the Georgia Upcountry, 1850–1890. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Handlin, Oscar, and Handlin, Mary. 1947. Commonwealth: A Study of the Role of Government in the American Economy: Massachusetts, 1774–1861. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harring, Sidney. 1983. Policing a Class Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1985. “Pigs and Positivism.” Wisconsin Law Review 1985:899–935.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1988a. “Mrs. Packard on Dependency.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 1:79–103.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1988b. “The Constitution of Aspiration and the ‘Rights that Belong to Us All.’” In Thelen, David, ed., The Constitution and American Life 353. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1948. Economic Policy and Democratic Thought: Pennsylvania, 1776–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haskins, George Lee, and Johnson, Herbert A.. 1981. Foundations of Power: John Marshall 1801–1815, Part One. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friederich A. von. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Wythe. 1984. “Labour Conspiracy Cases in the United States: Bias and Legitimation in Common Law Adjudication, 1805–1842.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 22:591–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Wythe. 1986. “Recovery by the Worker Who Quits: A Comparison of the Mainstream, Legal Realist, and Critical Legal Studies Approaches to a Problem of Nineteenth Century Contract Law.” Wisconsin Law Review 1986:677–732.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1973. “The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History.” American Journal of Legal History 17:275–294.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1977. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1988a. “Labor Conspiracies in American Law, 1880–1930.” Texas Law Review 66:919–965.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1988b. “The Political Economy of Substantive Due Process.” Stanford Law Review 40:379–447.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1988c. “Regulatory Conflict in the Gilded Age: Federalism and the Railroad Problem.” Yale Law Journal 97:1017–1072.Google Scholar
Howe, Daniel Walker. 1979. The Political Culture of the American Whigs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1964. Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836–1915. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1978. “Alexander Hamilton, Law Maker.” Columbia Law Review 78:483–547.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1979. “Old and New Dimensions of Research in United States Legal History.” American Journal of Legal History 23:1–20.Google Scholar
Hyman, Harold, and Wiecek, William M.. 1982. Equal Justice under Law: Constitutional Development, 1835–1875. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Jones, Alan. 1967. “Thomas M. Cooley and Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism.” Journal of American History 53:751–771.Google Scholar
Jones v Alfred H. Mayer, 392 U.S. 409 (1968).Google Scholar
Kaczorowski, Robert J. 1985. The Politics of Judicial Interpretation. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Kaczorowski, Robert J. 1986. “Revolutionary Constitutionalism in the Era of the Civil War and Reconstruction.” New York University Law Review 61:863–940.Google Scholar
Kainen, James. 1982. “Nineteenth Century Interpretation of the Federal Contract Clause: The Transformation from Vested to Substantive Rights against the State.” Buffalo Law Review 31:381–480.Google Scholar
Kairys, David. 1982. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Keller, Morton. 1977. Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America. Cambridge: Harvard University, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald. 1970. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald. 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1979. “The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries.” Buffalo Law Review 28:209–382.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1980. “Toward an Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness: The Case of Classical Legal Thought in America, 1850–1940.” Research on Law and Society 3:3–24.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1982. “Distributive and Paternalist Motives in Contract and Tort Law, with Special Reference to Compulsory Terms and Unequal Bargaining Power.” Maryland Law Review 41:563–658.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1989a. “Reconstruction and the Politics of Scholarship.” Yale Law Journal 98:521–539.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1989b. “Martin Luther King’s Constitution: A Legal History of the Montgomery Bus Boycott.” Yale Law Journal 98:999–1067.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda. 1980. Women of the Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl. 1978. “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act.” Minnesota Law Review 62:265–339.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. 1986. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard. 1976. Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Konefsky, Alfred S. 1983. Preface to Alfred S. Konefsky and Andrew King, eds., The Papers of Daniel Webster: Legal Papers, Vol. 1. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan. 1988. “The Supremacy of Equal Rights: The Struggle against Racial Discrimination in Ante-Bellum Massachusetts and the Foundations of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Northwestern Law Review 82:941–1010.Google Scholar
Kuisel, Richard. 1981. Capitalism and the State in France: Renovation and Economic Management in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kutler, Stanley I. 1982. The American Inquisition: Justice and Injustice in the Cold War. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. 1986. ‘“Non-Preferential’ Aid to Religion: A False Claim about Original Intent.” William and Mary Law Review 27:875–923.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. 1991. ‘“Noncoercive’ Support for Religion: Another False Claim about the Establishment Clause.” Valparaiso University Law Review 26:37–67.Google Scholar
Lebsock, Suzanne. 1984. The Free Women of Petersburg: Status and Culture in a Southern Town, 1784–1860. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. 1979. “Recovering the Revolution.” Prologue to Ralph Lerner, The Thinking Revolutionary: Principle and Practice in the New Republic, 1–38. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard Williams. 1957. The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David. 1990. The Province of Legislation Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Litwack, Leon. 1979. Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Lofgren, Charles. 1987. The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David. 1989. “Difference Made Legal: The Court and Dr. King.” Michigan Law Review 87:2152–2224.Google Scholar
Lynd, Staughton. 1988. “The Genesis of the Idea of a Community Right to Industrial Property in Youngstown and Pittsburgh, 1977–1987.” In Thelen, David, ed., The Constitution in American Life, 266–298. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles. 1987. In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl M. 1985. “The Concept of Equal Protection of the Laws: A Historical Inquiry.” San Diego Law Review 22:499–540.Google Scholar
May, James. 1989. “Antitrust in the Formative Era: Political and Economic Theory in Constitutional and Anti-Trust Analysis: 1880–1918.” Ohio State Law Journal 50:257–395.Google Scholar
McClellan, James. 1971. Joseph Story and the American Constitution. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael. 1990. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103:1409–1517.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles. 1975. “Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government-Business Relations.” Journal of American History 61:970–1005.Google Scholar
Meese, Edwin. [1985] 1990. “Interpreting the Constitution.” In Rakove, Jack N., ed., Interpreting the Constitution: The Debate Over Original Intent, 13–22. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Mensch, Elizabeth. 1982. “The Colonial Origins of Liberal Property Rights.” Buffalo Law Review 31:635–735.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1986. “Foreword: Traces of Self-Government.” Harvard Law Review 100:4–77.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1985. “Farming Underneath Everything That Grows: Toward a History of Family Law.” Wisconsin Law Review 1985:819–898.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. 1987. Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1990. Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, William. 1988. The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newmyer, Kent. 1985. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story: Statesman of the Old Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Noble, Charles. 1986. Liberalism at Work: The Rise and Fall of OSHA. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nockleby, John. 1983. “Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations in the Nineteenth Century.” Harvard Law Review 93:1510–1539.Google Scholar
Olsen, Frances. 1983. “The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform.” Harvard Law Review 96:1497–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Arnold. 1960. Conservative Crisis and the Rule of Law: Attitudes of Bar and Bench, 1887–1895. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peller, Gary. 1985. “The Metaphysics of American Law.” California Law Review 73:1152–1290.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael, and Sabel, Charles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1957. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pollack, Norman. 1987. The Just Polity: Populism, Law, and Human Welfare. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Powell, T. Jefferson. 1987. “Rules for Originalists.” Virginia Law Review 73:659–699.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen. 1991. The Original Misunderstanding: The English, the Americans, and the Dialectic of Federalist Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Presser, Stephen, and Hurley, Becky Bair. 1984. “Saving God’s Republic: The Jurisprudence of Samuel Chase.” University of Illinois Law Review 1984:771–822.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1977. “The Common Law and the Efficient Selection of Legal Rules.” Journal of Legal Studies 6:65–82.Google Scholar
Reddy, William. 1984. The Rise of Market Culture: The Textile Trade and the Rise of French Society, 1750–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. 1986–91. Constitutional History of the American Revolution. Vol. 1–3. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. 1988a. “Liberty and the Original Understanding,” In Essays in the History of Liberty: Seaver Institute Lectures at the Huntington Library. Vol. 1. Pasadena, CA: Huntington Library.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. 1988b. The Concept of Liberty in the Age of the American Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. 1989 . The Concept of Representation in the Age of the American Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias. 1990. “Nineteenth Century German Legal Science.” Boston College Law Review 31:837–897.Google Scholar
Rogers, Joel. 1990. “Divide and Conquer: Further Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Laws.” Wisconsin Law Review 1990:1–147.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol. 1986. “The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property.” University of Chicago Law Review 53:711–781.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H. 1977. “Why Is the Common Law Efficient?” Journal of Legal Studies 6:51–64.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 1985. “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production.” Past and Present 108 (August):133–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiber, Harry. 1972. “Government and the Economy: Studies of the Commonwealth Policy in Nineteenth Century America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3:135–151.Google Scholar
Scheiber, Harry. 1984. “Public Rights and the Rule of Law in American Legal History.” California Law Review 75:415–444.Google Scholar
Selvin, Molly. 1980. “The Public Trust Doctrine in American Law and Economic Policy, 1789–1920.” Wisconsin Law Review (1980):1403–1442.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H., Jr. 1980. Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna. 1986. “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication.” Virginia Law Review 72:543–616.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva. 1992. “Reasoning from the Body: A Historical Perspective on Abortion Regulation and Questions of Equal Protection.” Stanford Law Review 44:261–381.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen. 1984. “Understanding the Lochner Era: Lessons from the Controversy over Railroad and Utility Rate Regulation.” Virginia Law Review 70:187–263.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen. 1990. “Historism in Late Nineteenth-Century Constitutional Thought.” Wisconsin Law Review (1990):1431–1447.Google Scholar
Simon, William. 1985. “The Invention and Reinvention of Welfare Rights,” Maryland Law Review 44:1–37.Google Scholar
Simon, William. 1991. “Social-Republican Property.” UCLA Law Review 38:1335–1413.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph. 1980. “The Reliance Interest in Property.” Stanford Law Review 40:611–751.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph. 1982. “The Legal Rights Debate in Analytical Jurisprudence from Bentham to Hohfeld.” Wisconsin Law Review 1982:975–1059.Google Scholar
Soifer, Aviam. 1987. “The Paradoxes of Paternalism and Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism: United States Supreme Court, 1888–1921.” Law and History Review 5:249–279.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. 1980. Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, Robert. 1991. The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture, 1350–1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Katherine van Wezel. 1981. “The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law.” Yale Law Journal 90:1509–1580.Google Scholar
Story, Joseph. 1835. Inaugural discourse, “The Value and Importance of Legal Studies.” In Story, William W., ed., The Miscellaneous Writings, 503–548. Boston: J. Munroe and Company.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1985. “Interest Groups in American Public Law.” Stanford Law Review 38:29–87.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1988. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97:1539–1590.Google Scholar
Symposium. 1989. “Roads Not Taken: Undercurrents of Republican Thinking in Modern Constitutional Theory.” Northwestern University Law Review 84:1–249.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 1985. The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 1988. “A Mysterious Power: Industrial Accidents and the Legal Construction of Employment Relations in Massachusetts, 1800–1850.” Law and History Review 6:375–438.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1987. The NAACP Campaign against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1988. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1987. Politics: Part I, False Necessity – Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin. 1985. “State Courts and Protective Legislation during the Progressive Era.” Journal of American History 72:63–91.Google Scholar
VanderVelde, Lea. 1989. “The Labor Vision of the Thirteenth Amendment.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 138:437–504.Google Scholar
van Ee, Daun. 1986. David Dudley Field and the Reconstruction of the Law. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Walker, Mack. 1981. Johann Jakob Moser and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, James. 1968. The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State: 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Robert. 1986. “Commercial Morality, the Merchant Character, and the History of the Voidable Preference.” Stanford Law Review 39:3–138.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Carol. 1986. “Images of the Woman Juror.” Harvard Women’s Law Journal 9:59–82.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1988. The Marshall Court and Cultural Change: 1815–1835. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitman, James. 1990. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. 1967. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. 2nd edn. Goettingen: Vandenhoek & Reprecht.Google Scholar
Wiecek, William. 1977. The Sources of Antislavery Constitutionalism in America, 1760–1848. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean. 1984. Chants Democratic: New York City and the Rise of the American Working Class. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert A. 1990. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourse of Conquest. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 1986. Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy since the Civil War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×