Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:08:06.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The cycle of righteous destruction: a Terror Management Theory perspective on terrorist and counter-terrorist violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Werner G. K. Stritzke
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Stephan Lewandowsky
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
David Denemark
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Joseph Clare
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Frank Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Although it has often been said that violence begets violence, policy decisions rarely seem to reflect this ancient wisdom. Today's turbulent world of terrorism and counter-terrorism is certainly no exception, with violence being the tool of choice for all sides, and seemingly little regard for human life. This chapter discusses the psychological processes that lead terrorist groups and nations fighting against such groups to support violent solutions to their problems that entail the killing of multitudes of innocent people. By considering the psychological, social, and political forces that operate on both terrorist and counter-terrorist movements, we hope to avoid the infinite regress of blame that usually characterizes such discussions. We begin with a difficult but pivotal question: how can a human being justify the premeditated murder of innocent men, women, and children?

Such wanton killing violates the most basic definitions of morality shared by virtually all social institutions, religious and secular alike. In light of the extreme violence perpetrated by terrorists and the thousands killed as collateral damage in counter-terrorist campaigns, many feel that the answer must lie in the demonic nature of the perpetrators, who are often dismissed as archetypes of evil. Accepting this answer helps justify the violent course of action often taken in attempts to stop terrorism. If such evil exists, is it not our duty to eradicate the evil-doers to prevent the devastation of future attacks?

Type
Chapter
Information
Terrorism and Torture
An Interdisciplinary Perspective
, pp. 154 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altemeyer, B., and Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., and Simon., L. (1997). Suppression, accessibility of death-related thoughts, and cultural worldview defense: exploring the psychodynamics of terror management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,BBC News (2005). London bomber: text in full. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4206800.stm.
,BBC Two (2005). Power of Nightmares Part II: The Phantom Victory. October 27. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1038.htm.
Berkowitz, L. (1988). Frustrations, appraisals, and aversively stimulated aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 3–11.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, A. (1973). Some antecedents of felonious and delinquent behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 2, 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., and Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong and therefore, I exist: ingroup identification, ingroup entativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, F., Solomon, S.Maxfield, M.Pyszczynski, T., and Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal attraction: the effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship-oriented leaders. Psychological Science, 15, 846–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crano, W. D. and Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crocker, J., and Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Department of Public Information, United Nations (2005). United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from www.un.org/millenniumgoals/.
Felson, R. B. (1982). Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geen, R. G. (1990). Human Aggression. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R., and Jessop, D. C. (2007). Do Reminders of Terrorist Events Influence Acceptance of Racial Pride? A Terror Management Theory Perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
Greenberg, J., Porteus, J., Simon, L., and Pyszczynski, T. (1995). Evidence of a terror management function of cultural icons: the effects of mortality salience on the inappropriate use of cherished cultural symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1221–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., and Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of the need for self-esteem: a terror management theory. In Baumeister, R. F. (ed.), Public Self and Private Self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., and Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: the effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., and Arndt, J. (2008). A basic but uniquely human motivation: terror management. In Shah, J. (ed.), Handbook of Motivation Science. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., and Pyszczynski, T. (1997) Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (39 vols., Vol. XXIX, pp. 61–139). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczysnki, T., et al. (1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 913–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafez, M. M. (2006). Dying to be martyrs: the symbolic dimension of suicide terrorism. In Pedahzur, A. (ed.), Root Causes of Suicide Terrorism: The Globalization of Martyrdom (pp. 54–80). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., and McGregor, H. (1997). Terror Management Theory and self-esteem: evidence that increased self-esteem reduced mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberger, G., and Ein-Dor, T. (2006). Defenders of a lost cause: terror management and violent resistance to the disengagement plan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 761–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Human Genome Project Information (2007). The Science behind the Human Genome Project. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/info.shtml.
,Information Clearing House (2004) Full transcript of Bin Laden's speech Retrieved July 30, 2007, from www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7201.htm.
,International Work Group on Death, Dying, and Bereavement (2005). Breaking cycles of violence. Death Studies, 29, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., and Fishman, S. (2006). Terrorism between “syndrome” and “tool.”Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., et al. (2004). Deliver us from evil: the effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lifton, R. J. (2003). Superpower Syndrome: America's Apocalyptic Confrontation with the World. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, H., Lieberman, J. D., Solomon, S., et al. (1998). Terror management and aggression: evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motyl, M., Pyszczynski, T., Cox, C., Siedel, A., and Maxfield, M. (2007). One Big Family: The Effects of Mortality Salience and a Sense of Common Humanity on Prejudice. Unpublished manuscript.
Musharbash, Y. (2007). Terrorism in Europe: bin Laden's Eurofighters. April 11. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,476680,00.html.
,New York Times (2006). Spy agencies say Iraq war worsens terrorism threat. September 24. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?ex=1316750400&en=da252be85d1b39fa&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.
,Office of the Press Secretary (2001). Address to a joint session of congress and the American people. September. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920–8.html.
,Office of the Press Secretary (2005). President addresses nation, discusses Iraq, war on terror. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/06/print/20050628–7.html.
Pyszczynski, T., Abdollahi, A., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., and Weise, D. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: the great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., and Greenberg, J. (2003). In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., and Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem?: a theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, L. (2006). What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Confronting the Threat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., and Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: the effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rothgerber, H. J. (2000). Stereotyping under intergroup threat: the role of in-group identification and level of self-categorization. Dissertation Abstracts International. Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 590.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Z., Abdollahi, A., and Pyszczynski, T. (2007). Does Peace Have a Prayer? Effects of Mortality Salience, Religious Fundamentalism, and Compassionate Values on Hostility toward the Outgroup in the United States and Iran. Unpublished manuscript.
Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimel, J., Hayes, J., Williams, T., and Jahriq, J. (2007). Is death really the worm at the core? Converging evidence that worldview threat increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 789–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, J. (2003). Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., and Billig, M. G. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Voa News Online (2006). New poll of Islamic world says most Muslims reject terrorism. May 2. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from www.voanews.com/english/archive/2006–05/2006–05–02-voa82.cfm?CFID=169350783&CFTOKEN=88724635.
Walters, G. D. (2005). Proactive and reactive aggression: a lifestyle view. In Morgan, J. P. (ed.), Psychology of Aggression (pp. 29–43). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Weise, D. R., Pyszczynski, T., Cox, C. R., Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., and Solomon, S. (2008). Interpersonal politics: the role of terror management and attachment processes in political preferences. Psychological Science, 19, 448–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wessells, M. (2006). The impact of US antiterrorism interventions on terrorist motivation: preliminary research in Afghanistan and Iraq. In Kimmel, P. R. and Stout, C. E. (eds.), Collateral Damage: The Psychological Consequences of America's War on Terrorism (pp. 165–188). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The Cognitive Control of Motivation: The Consequences of Choice and Dissonance. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Co.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×