Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T11:15:30.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Expanding and Better Targeting U.S. Investment in Energy Innovation: An Analytical Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Laura Diaz Anadon
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Laura Diaz Anadon
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Matthew Bunn
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Venkatesh Narayanamurti
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Physics, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

In Chapter 1 we describe the urgent challenges posed by the current U.S. energy system and make the case that accelerated innovation in energy technologies will be essential in meeting these challenges. In this chapter, we explore the question of determining the appropriate role for the U.S. government in fostering energy innovation. This is a complex issue because the U.S. energy system encompasses many functions (e.g., invention and discovery, R&D spillovers, economies of scale, clustering, learning by doing, deployment, etc.); government actions to facilitate innovation interact with private actors in many markets; there are a multiplicity of actors (e.g., national and regional public organizations, private firms, universities, consumers); there is deep uncertainty in future technology performance rooted in many factors (e.g., the rate of technological change, economic growth, energy prices, consumer adoption, etc.).

In this book we take a systems approach to the innovation process. The chapter starts by focusing on selected key government functions, and in Chapter 6, we integrate the analysis from this chapter with analysis and holistic recommendations that cut across the entire system. Our analysis in this chapter starts with the energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) investments of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) – the single largest public funder of energy RD&D in the United States. Despite the broader scope of DOE's jurisdiction, which we trace to its historical roots, we limit our analysis to only the department's energy RD&D funding activities. After describing DOE's current role investing in energy RD&D, we analyze how DOE makes decisions about its energy RD&D investments. We argue that a method to inform public energy RD&D funding decisions that allows for an integrated, consistent, and transparent analysis among competing technology areas is needed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Juaied, M., & Whitmore, A. (2009). “Realistic costs of carbon capture.” Discussion Paper no. 2009–08. Cambridge, Mass.: Energy Technology Innovation Policy Group. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.CrossRef
American Energy Innovation Council. (2010). A Business Plan for America's Energy Future. Full report. Retrieved from (Accessed September 20, 2011).
Anadon, L.D., Bosetti, V., Bunn, M., Catenacci, M., & Lee, A. (2012). “Expert judgments about RD&D and the future of nuclear energy.” Environmental Science & Technology, 41(21):11497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anadon, L.D., Bunn, M., Chan, G., Chan, M., Gallagher, K.S., Jones, C., Kempener, R., Lee, A., & Narayanamurti, V. (2010). “DOE FY 2011 budget request for energy research, development, demonstration, and deployment: Analysis and recommendations.” Cambridge, Mass.: Energy Technology Innovation Policy Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Anadon, L.D, Bunn, M., Chan, G., Chan, M., Jones, C., Kempener, R., Lee, A., Logar, N., & Narayanamurti, V. (2011, November). Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: Report for Energy Technology Innovation Policy Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F.Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Anadon, L.D., & Holdren, J.P. (2009). “Policy for energy-technology innovation.” In Acting in Time on Energy Policy, edited by Gallagher, K.S., pp. 89–127. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
APS. (2008). “Energy future: Think efficiency. How America can look within to achieve energy security and reduce global warming.” American Physical Society. Retrieved from (Accessed September 20, 2011).
Baker, E., Chon, H., & Keisler, J.M. (2008). “Advanced nuclear power: Combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy.” Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from (Accessed January 18, 2010).CrossRef
Baker, E., Chon, H., & Keisler, J. (2009a). “Advanced solar R&D: Combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy.” Energy Economics, 31: 537–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E., Chon, H., & Keisler, J. (2009b). “Carbon capture and storage: Combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy.” Climatic Change, 96(3):379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E., Chon, H., & Keisler, J. (2010). “Battery technology for electric and hybrid vehicles: Expert views about prospects for advancement.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(7):1139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E., & Keisler, J. (2009). “Cellulosic biofuels: Expert views on prospects for advancement.” Retrieved from (Accessed January 18, 2010).
Bird, L., Chapman, C., Logan, J., Sumner, J., & Short, W. (2010). Evaluating Renewable Portfolio Standards and Carbon Cap Scenarios in the U.S. Electric Sector. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-48258. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. May. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Blanford, G.J. (2009). “R&D investment strategy for climate change.” Energy Economics, 31(1): S27–S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, M., Wiser, R., Cory, K., & James, T. (2009). PTC, ITC, or Cash Grant? An Analysis of the Choice Facing Renewable Power Projects in the United States. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-45359. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed February 12, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Duval, R., Sgobbi, A., & Tavoni, M. (2009). The Role of R&D and Technology Diffusion in Climate Change Mitigation: New Perspectives Using the Witch Model. Nota di Lavoro 14.2009. Venice, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Retrieved from (Accessed on February 12, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.A. (2001). “Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies.” Energy Policy, 29:1197–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.A., Southworth, F., & Stovall, T.K. (2005). Towards a Climate-Friendly Built Environment. Report. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Retrieved from (Accessed on February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Chan, G., Anadon, L.D., Chan, M., & Lee, A. (2010). “Expert elicitation of cost, performance, and RD&D budgets for coal power with CCS.” Energy Procedia, 4: 2685–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, G., & Anadon, L.D. (2014). “Improving decision making for public R&D investments with an example in energy.” Submitted.
Clarke, J., Weyant, J., & Birky, A. (2006). “On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence.” Energy Economics, 28:579–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R.M. (1991). Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., Gadgil, A., & Koomey, J.G. (2002). “What can history teach us? A retrospective examination of long-term energy forecasts for the United States.” Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 27:83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtright, A.E., Morgan, M.G., & Keith, D.W. (2008). “Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies.” Environmental Science & Technology, 42 (24):9031–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalkey, N.C. (1969). The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. RM-Report 5888-PR Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from (Accessed on February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Davis, G.A., & Owens, B. (2003). “Optimizing the level of renewable electric R&D expenditures using real options analysis.” Energy Policy, 31:1589–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, P., & Margolis, R. (2008). Supply Curves for Rooftop Solar PV-Generated Electricity for the United States. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report. NREL/TP-6A0–44073. November. Retrieved from (Accessed July 21, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOE. (2008, July). “20% wind energy by 2030.” Washington, D.C.: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed July 21, 2011).
Dooley, J.J. (2008, October). “U.S. federal investments in energy R&D: 1961–2008.” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report PNNL-17952. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05–76RL01830.
DSIRE. (2010). “Renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC).” Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency. Retrieved from (Accessed January 4, 2011).
EERE. (2008). “20% wind energy by 2030: Increasing wind energy's contribution to U.S. electricity supply.” Washington, D.C.: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. U.S. Department of Energy.
EIA. (2009). “Energy market and economic impacts of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.” Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.
EIA. (2010a). Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with Projections to 2035. Report No. DOE/EIA-0383(2010). Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy, United States. Retrieved from (Accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
EIA. (2010b). Annual Energy Outlook 2011 Early Release Report. Report No. DOE/EIA-0383ER(2011) [Homepage of Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy]. Retrieved from (Accessed January 23, 2011).
EIA. (2010c). Annual Energy Review. Report No. DOE/EIA-0384(2009). Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
EIA. (2010d). “Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2010.” Washington, D.C.: Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy.
EIA. (2010e). Buildings Energy Data Book [Homepage of Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy]. Retrieved from buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableOfContents.aspx (Accessed July 8, 2011).
EIA. (2011a). Natural Gas – Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed July 24, 2011).Google Scholar
EIA. (2011b). Petroleum & Other Liquids – Data. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed July 24, 2011).Google Scholar
EIA. (2011c). Annual Energy Review – Electricity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Department of Energy. Table 8.11b. Retrieved from (Accessed July 22, 2011).Google Scholar
Energy Innovation Tracker. (2013). “Energy innovation tracker.” Retrieved from (Accessed May 2, 2013).
Fischer, C., & Newell, R.G. (2008). “Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55:142–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbone, L.G., & Abilock, H. (1981). “MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the BNL version.” International Journal of Energy Research, 5(4):353–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, K.S., & Anadon, L.D. (2013). DOE Budget Authority for Energy Research, Development, & Demonstration Database. Retrieved from (Accessed April 20, 2013).
Gallagher, K.S., Holdren, J.P., & Sagar, A.D. (2006). “Energy-technology innovation.” Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 31:193–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, M.L., & Bray, O.H. (1997). Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping, SAND97–0665. Albuquerque, N.M.: Sandia National Laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F.W., Hekkert, M.P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). “The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5):521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L., & Schneider, S. (1999). “Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement policies.” Resource and Energy Economics, 21:211–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1992). “The search for R&D spillovers.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94:S29–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruebler, A. (2011). “The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing.” Energy Policy, 38:5174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R.M., & Newell, R.G., eds. (2011). Accelerating Innovation in Energy: Insights from Multiple Sectors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Hicks, J.R. (1932). The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holdren, J.P., & Baldwin, S.F. (2001). “The PCAST energy studies: Toward a national consensus on energy research, development, demonstration, and deployment.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26:391–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, K. (2010). “Sen. Graham's plan for clean-energy bill could drain RES support.” Greenwire. The New York Times, September 29.
Iman, R.L., & Conover, W.J. (1982). “A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables.” Communications in Statistics B, 11:311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., & Stavins, R.N. (2005). “A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy.” Ecological Economics, 54:164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammen, D.F., & Nemet, G.F. (2005a). “Supplement: Estimating energy R&D investments required for climate stabilization.” Issues in Science and Technology, 22(1):84–8.Google Scholar
Kammen, D.M., & Nemet, G.F. (2005b). “Reversing the incredible shrinking U.S. energy R&D budget.” Issues in Science and Technology, 22(1):84–8.Google Scholar
Laitner, J.A. (2009). The National Energy Efficiency Resource Standard as an energy productivity tool [Homepage of American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy]. Retrieved from (Accessed September 14, 2010).
Lester, R.K., & Hart, D.M. (2011). Unlocking Energy Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loulou, R., Goldstein, G., & Noble, K. (2004). Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. Retrieved from (Accessed February 12, 2014).
Lutsey, N., & Sperling, D. (2008). “America's bottom-up climate change mitigation policy.” Energy Policy, 36:673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martino, J. (1987). “Using precursors as leading indicators of technological change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 32:341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, M.D., Conover, W.J., & Beckman, R.J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21:239–45.Google Scholar
McNerney, J., Trancik, J.E., & Farmer, J.D. (2011). “Historical costs of coal-fired electricity and implications for the future.” Energy Policy, 39:3062–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIT. (2006). The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. Report. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from (Accessed on February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Morgan, M.G., & Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., & Martin, B.R. (2010). “Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wind in old bottles won't work).” Research Policy, 39:1011–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). “The influence of market demand upon innovation – a critical review of some recent empirical studies.” Research Policy, 8(2):102–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanamurti, V., Anadon, L.D., Breetz, H., Bunn, M., Lee, H., & Mielke, E. (2011). Transforming the Energy Economy: Options for Accelerating the Commercialization of Advanced Energy Technologies. Report for Energy Technology Innovation Policy Research Group. Cambridge, Mass.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
NCEP. (2004). “Ending the energy stalemate. A bipartisan strategy to meet America's energy challenges.” Washington, D.C.: The National Commission on Energy Policy.
NCEP. (2007). Energy Policy Recommendations to the President and the 110th Congress. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Energy Policy.Google Scholar
Nemet, G.F. (2006). “Beyond the learning curve: Factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics.” Energy Policy, 34:3218–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NRC. (2001). Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth it? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1978 to 2000. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NRC. (2007). Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE: Phase Two. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, M., O’Neill, B.C., Webster, M., & Agrawala, S. (2007). “The limits of consensus.” Science, 317:1505–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, S.M., & Quigley, J.M. (1977). “Regulatory barriers to the diffusion of innovation: Some evidence from building codes.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(2):361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PCAST. (1997). Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century. Report. Washington, D.C.: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from (Accessed on February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
PCAST. (2010). Report to the President on Accelerating the Pace of Change in Energy Technologies Through an Integrated Federal Energy Policy. Washington, D.C.: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Executive Office of the President.Google Scholar
Pugh, G., Clarke, L., Marlay, R., Kyle, P., Wise, M., McJeon, H., & Chan, G. (2010). “Energy R&D portfolio analysis based on climate change mitigation.” Energy Economics, 33(4):634–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseur, J.L. (2007). Climate Change: Action by States to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Order Code RL33812. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from (Accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Sagar, A.D. (2004). “Technology innovation and energy.” Cleveland, C. (Ed). In The Encyclopedia of Energy, Vol. 6, edited by C. Cleveland, pp. 27–43. Elsevier Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagar, D.J., & van der Zwan, B. (2006). “Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment and learning-by-doing.” Energy Policy, 34:2601–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schock, R., Fulkerson, W., Brown, M., San Martin, R., Greene, D., & Edmonds, J. (1999). “How much is energy research and development worth as insurance?Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 24:487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciortino, M. (2010). State Energy Efficient Resource Standard (EERS) Fact Sheet, Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Stewart, W.E., Stoddard, E.H., Geraci, K.K., & Ham, D.K. (1983). “Trends in federal support for energy R&D.” Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Studies. February.
The White House. (2009). “Press gaggle by Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs; Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economic Affairs, Mike Froman; and Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate, Carol Browner.” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Press Secretary, The White House.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). “Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.” Cognitive Psychology, 5(2):207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.S. (1998). “Discussion papers already published: ‘Understanding relationships using copulas’ by Edward Frees and Emiliano Valdez.” North American Actuarial Journal, 2(1):137–41.Google Scholar
Weiss, C., & Bonvillian, W.B. (2009). Structuring an Energy Technology Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiser, R.H., & Pickle, S.J. (1998). “Financing investments in renewable energy: The impacts of policy design.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2:361–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B. (2005). Residential Energy Code Evaluations Review and Future Directions. Providence, R.I.: Building Code Assistance Project.Google Scholar
Energy Information Administration's (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook 2010 (EIA, 2010a)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×