Book contents
- Water Justice
- Reviews
- Water Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: The Multiple Challenges and Layers of Water Justice Struggles
- Part I Re-Politicizing Water Allocation
- Part II Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
- Introduction: Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
- 6 “… And Not a Single Injustice Remains”: Hydro-Territorial Colonization and Techno-Political Transformations in Spain
- 7 Making Space for the Cauca River in Colombia
- 8 Reconfiguration of Hydrosocial Territories and Struggles for Water Justice
- 9 Large-Scale Dam Development and Counter Movements
- Part III Exclusion and Struggles for Co-Decision
- Part IV Governmentality, Discourses and Struggles over Imaginaries and Water Knowledge
- Index
- References
9 - Large-Scale Dam Development and Counter Movements
Water Justice Struggles around Guatemala’s Chixoy Dam
from Part II - Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2018
Book contents
- Water Justice
- Reviews
- Water Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: The Multiple Challenges and Layers of Water Justice Struggles
- Part I Re-Politicizing Water Allocation
- Part II Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
- Introduction: Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
- 6 “… And Not a Single Injustice Remains”: Hydro-Territorial Colonization and Techno-Political Transformations in Spain
- 7 Making Space for the Cauca River in Colombia
- 8 Reconfiguration of Hydrosocial Territories and Struggles for Water Justice
- 9 Large-Scale Dam Development and Counter Movements
- Part III Exclusion and Struggles for Co-Decision
- Part IV Governmentality, Discourses and Struggles over Imaginaries and Water Knowledge
- Index
- References
Summary
Large-scale hydraulic interventions - for hydroelectric power, year-round water supply, flood control, or diversions to irrigate agricultural crops - have long been recognized as essential infrastructure that secures the needs of modern society. Historically, the social and economic goods generated by water enclosure and distribution systems allowed increased density in cities and towns and fueled the expansion of economic and political power. Today, large-scale hydrodevelopment is central to the national energy budget for the majority of the world’s States. However, the evidence of systemic damage to local and global ecosystems and the life such systems support is increasingly apparent, and the relative societal good of this enclosure and use of the water commons is both challenged and contested by the synergistic and cumulative impact of hydrodevelopment. With an entry point provided by the lens of historical events that shaped a specific case, Guatemala’s Chixoy Dam, this chapter explores how and why the relative perception of hydrodevelopment and the enclosure of the water commons fuels movements for water justice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Water Justice , pp. 169 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Albertos, C. (2015). “Guatemala: Chixoy Dam-affected communities: Current status and challenges,” paper presented to the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Pittsburgh, March 24–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. (2012). The Fish that Ate the Whale: The Life and Times of America’s Banana King. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Commission for Historical Clarification (Comisión para el Esclarecimiento Histórico, CEH). (1999). Memory of Silence: The Guatemalan Truth Commission Report. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Consolidated Appropriations Act. (2014). Public Law No. 113–76. January 17, 2014. Congress. Gov. Guatemala City.Google Scholar
Cullather, N. (2006). Secret History: The CIA’s Classified Account of its Operations in Guatemala, 1952–1954. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1983). Testimony on the environmental impact of a multilateral development bank-funded project: Hearings before the Subcommittee on International Development Institutions and Finance of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, Washington, DC, June 28 and 29.Google Scholar
Deardon, N. (2012). “Guatemala’s Chixoy dam: Where development and terror intersect.” The Guardian, December 10, 2012.Google Scholar
Doyle, K. and Kornbluh, P. (1997). CIA and assassinations: The Guatemala 1954 documents. National Security Archive, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/.Google Scholar
Dutch, S. (2009). The largest act of environmental warfare in history. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 15(4), 287–97.Google Scholar
Guatemala Human Rights Center (GHRC). (2016). “Guatemala news update, February 6–12,” Monitoring Guatemala: GHRC’s Human Rights Blog. February 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Gwin, C. (1997). US relations with the World Bank, 1945–1992. In D. Kapur, J. Lewis, and R. Webb (eds.), The World Bank: Its First Half Century, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Human Rights Court. (2012). Rio Negro Massacres v. Guatemala, www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_250_ing.pdf.Google Scholar
International Financial Institutions Act (1977) (22 U. S. C. 262(d)), Public Law 95–118, October 3, 1977, www.cfr.org/human-rights/international-financial-institutions-act-1977/p27148.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (2000). “Reparations and the right to remedy.” Briefing paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINVRES/214578-1112885441548/20480101/ReparationsandtheRighttoRemedysoc221.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (2005). Chixoy Dam Legacy Issues Study, vol. 1: Executive Summary Consequential Damages and Reparation: Recommendations for Remedy; vol. 2: Document Review and Chronology of Relevant Actions and Events; vol. 3: Consequential Damage Assessment of Chixoy River Basin. New York: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Center for Political Ecology.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (2010). Chixoy dam legacies: The struggle to secure reparation and the right to remedy in Guatemala. Water Alternatives, 3(2), 341–61.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (ed.) (2011). Life and Death Matters: Human Rights, Environment, and Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. (2012). Water, culture, power: Hydro-development dynamics. In B. Johnston, , L. Hiwasaki, I. Klaver, A. Ramos-Castillo, and V. Strang (eds.), Water, Cultural Diversity, and Global Environmental Change. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, B. (2013). Human needs and environmental rights to water: A biocultural systems approach to hydro-development and management. Ecosphere, 4(3), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, B. (2016). Action-research and environmental justice: Lessons from Guatemala’s Chixoy Dam. In Heiss, U., J. Christensen and M. Neimann (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. and Fiske, S. (2014). The precarious state of the hydrosphere. WIREs Water 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, B. (2005). Paradise in Ashes: A Guatemalan Journey of Courage, Terror, and Hope. Vol. 8. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, D. E., Craig, J. F., Davidson, N., Delany, S. and Seddon, M. (2001). Biodiversity impacts of large dams. World Commission on Dams Background paper, 1. New York: IUCN.Google Scholar
Museo Comunitario Rabinal Achi. (2003). Oj K’aslik, Estamos Vivos: Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica de Rabinal (1944–1996). Baja Verapaz: Rabinal.Google Scholar
Mychalejko, C. (2013). Profiting from genocide: The World Bank’s bloody history in Guatemala. Truthout, March 8, 2013.Google Scholar
Oxfam Issue Briefing. (2015). The suffering of others: The human cost of the International Financial Corporation’s lending through financial intermediaries. Oxfam Issue Briefing, April 2015, pp. 11–13. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
Pacenza, M. (1996). A people damned: The Chixoy dam, Guatemalan massacres and the World Bank. Multinational Monitor, 17(7–8), 8–12.Google Scholar
Partridge, W. (1983). Comparative Analysis of Bid Experience with Resettlement: Based on Evaluations of the Arenal and Chixoy Projects. New York: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Partridge, W. (1984). Recommendations for Human Resettlement and Community Reconstruction Components of the Chixoy Project. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar
Postel, S. and Richter, B. (2012). Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Renaud, F., Syvitski, J., Sebesvari, Z., Werners, S. E., Kremer, H., Kuenzer, C., Ramesh, R., Jeuken, A., and Friedrich, J. (2013). Tipping from the Holocene to the Anthropocene: How threatened are major world deltas? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 644–54.Google Scholar
Richter, B., Postel, S., Revenga, C., Scudder, T., Lehner, B., Churchill, A. and Chow, M. (2010). Lost in development’s shadow: The downstream human consequences of dam. Water Alternatives 3, 14–42.Google Scholar
Schofield, T. (1998). Environment as an ideological weapon: A proposal to criminalize environmental terrorism. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 26(3), 619–47.Google Scholar
Schirmer, J. (1998). The Guatemalan Military Project: A Violence Called Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Scudder, T. (2005). The Future of Large Dams: Dealing with Social. Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Toussaint, E. (2014). “Domination of the United States on the World Bank. Bretton Woods, the World Bank and the IMF: 70th anniversary (Part 7). Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt,” www.cadtm.org/.Google Scholar
Van Cappellen, P. and Maavara, T. (2016). Rivers in the Anthropocene: Global scale modifications of riverine nutrient fluxes by damming. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 16(2), 106–11.Google Scholar
Vörösmarty, C., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S., Sullivan, C., Liermann, C., and Davies, P. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555–61.Google Scholar
Westing, A. (1980). Warfare in a Fragile World: Military Impact on the Human Environment. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
World Bank. (1951). “Guatemala Economic Development Plan,” http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/527361468251181949/text/multi0page.txt.Google Scholar
World Bank Group Archives. (2001). “World Bank Group historical chronology,” http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTARCHIVES/Resources/Bank%20chronology.pdf.Google Scholar
World Commission on Dams. (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-making: the Report of the World Commission on Dams. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
World Wildlife Federation. (2015). “Free-flowing rivers: Economic luxury or ecological necessity?” Appendix 1:12, www.wwf.se/source.php/1120326/free.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by