Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T14:52:34.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Ecological constraints and the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances

from Part III - Ecological dimensions of whale-watching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

By
David Lusseau
Edited by
James Higham ,
Lars Bejder  and
Rob Williams
David Lusseau
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
James Higham
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Lars Bejder
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Rob Williams
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Interactions between boats and cetaceans influence the behaviour of animals. Cetaceans will tend to evade boat interactions and these evasion tactics will lead to altered activity budgets (Williams et al., 2002, 2006; Nowacek et al., 2001, Lusseau, 2003, 2004). In some instances, those influences can have severe impacts for individuals and their populations (Lusseau, 2004, 2005a; Williams et al., 2006; Lusseau et al., 2006; Bejder et al., 2006). However, we currently have no way to determine a priori when boat-interaction effects will lead to biological impacts and when those will have population consequences. This lack of predictive power means that we lack the scientific foundations to manage the current rapid growth of the whale-watching industry and therefore the industry's sustainability is being questioned (Corkeron, 2004; Higham & Lusseau, 2007). In this chapter, I develop a conceptual understanding of how the natural constraints that populations face can be critical factors increasing the propensity for population consequences of whale-watching disturbances. This conceptualization is leading to the development of a number of predictions that I encourage the scientific community to test. Each of these hypotheses is highlighted in their relevant section and I also bring them together in the conclusion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Whale-watching
Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management
 , pp. 229 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anwar, S.M., Jeanneret, C.A., Parrott, L. & Marceau, D.J. (2007). Conceptualization and implementation of a multi-agent model to simulate whale-watching tours in the St. Lawrence Estuary in Quebec, Canada. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(12), 1775–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, N.B. & Wells, R.S. (1998). Prey and feeding patterns of resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Journal of Mammalogy 79(3), 1045–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, C.M. & Monaghan, P. (2004a). Behavioural responses to human disturbance: A matter of choice?Animal Behaviour 68, 1065–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, C.M. & Monaghan, P. (2004b). Human disturbance: People as predation-free predators?Journal of Applied Ecology 41(2), 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejder, L. (2005). Linking short and long-term effects of nature-based tourism on cetaceans. MS Thesis, Dalhousie University.
Bejder, L., Samuels, A., Whitehead, H., et al. (2006). Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conservation Biology 20(6), 1791–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, G. (1980). The costs of reproduction and their consequences. American Naturalist 116(1), 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit-Bird, K.J. & Au, W.L. (2003). Prey dynamics affect foraging by a pelagic predator over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53, 364–373.Google Scholar
Buckstaff, K.C. (2004). Effects of watercraft noise on the acoustic behavior of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 20(4), 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R.C., Read, A.J. & Wrangham, R.W. (2000). Male reproductive strategies and social bonds. In Connor, R.C., Mann, J., Tyack, P.L. & Whitehead, H. (Eds), Cetacean Societies. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press, pp. 247–269.Google Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. (2004). Whalewatching, iconography, and marine conservation. Conservation Biology 18(3), 847–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. & Connor, R.C. (1999). Why do baleen whales migrate?Marine Mammal Science 15(4), 1228–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, A.S. & Herman, L.M. (1997). Sex differences in site fidelity and migration of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to the Hawaiian Islands. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75, 1923–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currey, R.J.C., Dawson, S.M., Slooten, E., et al. (2009a). Survival rates for a declining population of bottlenose dolphins in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand: An information theoretic approach to assessing the role of human impacts. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(6), 658–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currey, R.J.C., Dawson, S.M. & Slooten, E. (2009b). An approach for regional threat assessment under IUCN Red List criteria that is robust to uncertainty: The Fiordland bottlenose dolphins are critically endangered. Biological Conservation 142(8), 1570–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currey, R.J.C., Dawson, S.M. & Slooten, E. (2011), Tursiops truncatus (Fiordland subpopulation). In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. Retrieved from (accessed 18 June 2012).
Ellenberg, U., Setiawan, A.N., Cree, A., Houston, D.M. & Seddon, P.J. (2007). Elevated hormonal stress response and reduced reproductive output in Yellow-eyed penguins exposed to unregulated tourism. General and Comparative Endocrinology 152(1), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., et al. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M., Olesiuk, P. & Balcomb, K.C. (2009). Linking killer whale survival and prey abundance. Biology Letters 6(1), 139–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frid, A. & Dill, L.M. (2002). Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conservation Ecology 6(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannon, D.P., Berens McCabe, E.J., Camilleri, S.A., et al. (2009). Effects of Karenia brevis harmful algal blooms on nearshore fish communities in southwest Florida. Marine Ecology Progress Series 378, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, G.D., Wilson, B., Wilson, L.J., Parsons, K.M. & Thompson, P.M. (2004). Functional mechanisms underlying cetacean distribution patterns: Hotspots for bottlenose dolphins are linked to foraging. Marine Biology 144(2), 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, D.D.W., Logsdon, M.G., Holmes, E.E., VanBlaricom, G.R. & Osborne, R.W. (2007). Summer distribution patterns of southern resident killer whales Orcinus orca: Core areas and spatial segregation of social groups. Marine Ecology Progress Series 351, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, M.R. & Dill, L.M. (2002). Food availability and tiger shark predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83(2), 480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heithaus, M.R. & Dill, L.M. (2006). Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at mutiple spatial scales. Oikos 114, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, J.E.S. & Lusseau, D. (2007). Urgent need for empirical research into whaling and whale watching. Conservation Biology 21(2), 554–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, S.L. & Zollner, P.A. (1996). Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(3), 131–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusseau, D. (2003). Male and female bottlenose dolphins Tursiops sp. have different strategies to avoid interactions with tour boats in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 257, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2004). The hidden cost of tourism: Detecting long-term effects of tourism using behavioral information. Ecology and Society 9(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2005a). The residency pattern of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in Milford Sound, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D. (2005b). The state of the scenic cruise industry in Doubtful Sound in relation to a key natural resource: Bottlenose dolphins. In Hall, M. & Boyd, S. (Eds), Nature-based Tourism in Peripheral Areas: Development or disaster?London: Channelview Publications, pp. 246–262.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D. & Bejder, L. (2007). The long-term consequences of short-term responses to disturbance. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 20, 228–236.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D. & Higham, J.E.S. (2004). Managing the impacts of dolphin-based tourism through the definition of critical habitats: The case of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Tourism Management 25, 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, S.M. & Wing, S.R. (2006). Importance of local production versus pelagic subsidies in the diet of an isolated population of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops sp. Marine Ecology Progress Series 321, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D., Williams, R.J., Wilson, B., et al. (2004). Parallel influence of climate on the behaviour of Pacific killer whales and Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Ecology Letters 7, 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D., Slooten, E. & Currey, R.J.C. (2006). Unsustainable dolphin-watching tourism in Fiordland, New Zealand. Tourism in Marine Environments 3(2), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClung, M.R., Seddon, P.J., Massaro, M. & Setiawan, A.N. (2004). Nature-based tourism impacts on yellow-eyed penguins Megadyptes antipodes. Biological Conservation 119(2), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, K.A., Allen, J.B., Barleycorn, A.A. & Wells, R.S. (2011). Severe Karenia brevis red tides influence juvenile bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) behavior in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 27(3), 622–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, C.R., Burton, H.R. & Bester, M.N. (2000). Weaning mass and the future survival of juvenile southern elephant seals at Macquarie Island. Antarctic Science 12, 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehtälä, J. & Vuorisalo, T. (2007). Conservation policy and the EU Habitats Directive: Favourable conservation status as a measure of conservation success. European Environment 17(6), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müllner, A., Linsenmair, K.E. & Wikelski, M. (2004). Exposure to ecotourism reduces survival and affects stress response in hoatzin chicks. Biological Conservation 118(4), 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacek, S.M., Wells, R.S. & Solow, A.R. (2001). Short-term effects of boat traffic on bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 17(4), 673–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, O.L., Gonzalez, A. & Wilson, H.B. (1997). Effects on population persistence: The interaction between environmental noise colour, intraspecific competition, and space. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 264(1389), 1841–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.R. & Wells, R.S. (2011). Recreational fishing depredation and associated behaviors involving common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Marine Mammal Science 27(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981). A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62(2), 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W.A., et al. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stearns, S.C. (1977). The evolution of life history traits: A critique of the theory and a review of the data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P.O. & Taber, S.M. (1984). Mother–infant interaction and behavioral development in southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. Behaviour 88, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasseur, D.A. & Yodzis, P. (2004). The color of environmental noise. Ecology 85(4), 1146–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H. & Mann, J. (2000). Female reproductive strategies of cetaceans. In Mann, J., Connor, R.C., Tyack, P.L. & Whitehead, H. (Eds), Cetacean Societies: Field studies of dolphins and whales. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H. & Payne, R. (1981). New techniques for assessing populations of right whales without killing them. FAO Fisheries Series (5) [Mammals in the Seas] 3, 189–209.Google Scholar
Williams, R., Trites, A.W. & Bain, D.E. (2002). Behavioural responses of killer whales (Orcinus orca) to whale-watching boats: Opportunistic observations and experimental approaches. Journal of Zoology 256, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., Lusseau, D. & Hammond, P.S. (2006). Estimating relative energetic costs of human disturbance to killer whales (Orcinus orca). Biological Conservation 133(3), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirsing, A.J., Heithaus, M.R., Frid, A. & Dill, L.M. (2008). Seascapes of fear: Evaluating sublethal predator effects experienced and generated by marine mammals. Marine Mammal Science 24(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×