To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this volume, Stephanie M. Langin-Hooper investigates the impact of Greek art on the miniature figure sculptures produced in Babylonia after the conquests of Alexander the Great. Figurines in Hellenistic Babylonia were used as agents of social change, by visually expressing and negotiating cultural differences. The scaled-down quality of figurines encouraged both visual and tactile engagement, enabling them to effectively work as non-threatening instruments of cultural blending. Reconstructing the embodied experience of miniaturization in detailed case studies, Langin-Hooper illuminates the dynamic process of combining Greek and Babylonian sculpture forms, social customs, and viewing habits into new, hybrid works of art. Her innovative focus on figurines as instruments of both personal encounter and global cultural shifts has important implications for the study of tiny objects in art history, anthropology, classics, and other disciplines.
Chapter 3 analyzes the range of indices of antiquity that interpreters in Roman Anatolia consider meaningful. It examines the groupings of remains that interpreters formed to frame or support their favored historical narratives and calls attention to the fact that ancient groupings do not always correspond to what modern archaeologists usually consider archaeologically meaningful evidence.
Chapter 2 asks who was interested in and knowledgeable about the physical traces of the past in Roman Anatolia. The chapter is focused on the various people in the region who interacted daily with ruins and other such indices of antiquity. It sheds light on the very wide social range of ancient interpreters, on the dynamics of interaction among them, and on the different strategies of interaction with realia that those various people had.
Chapter 6 discusses how the author’s analysis of Roman-period evidence intersects with current discussions in about the location of authority in archaeology and anthropology. It argues that the evidence treated in this book is fundamental to the long-term history of archaeology and antiquarianism, even without being evidence of either.
Chapter 1 provides examples of the types of data available, specifies the temporal and spatial scope of the investigations, and offers brief descriptions of the individual chapters of the book.
Chapter 5 offers a series of interrelated vignettes that shed light on Roman-period in interest in material remains of the past in regions other than Anatolia. These vignettes are intended as an invitation to historians and archaeologists working beyond Anatolia to explore the specific political and cultural circumstances in which archaeophilia is mainfest in different parts of the Roman world.
Chapter 4 surveys some of the many memory horizons available to the inhabitants of Roman Anatolia interested in the physical traces of the past. Rome loomed large throughout much of the region, but Anatolian interpreters of antiquities also tapped into historical traditions that did not recognize Rome as a center, including ones that modern scholars associate more readily with Mesopotamia, Iran, the Levant, and the Caucasus. This chapter shows how some traces of the past served to substantiate different, conflicting, and even contradictory historical narratives at local, regional, and transregional scales. The conclusions to this chapter summarize my opinions on archaeophilia as it is attested specifically in Roman Anatolia.