To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The ferment of ideas towards the close of the fifth century b.c. brought to the fore a number of conceptions relevant to our theme, which we shall find further developed and elaborated in later generations: the notion of a single universal and permanent ‘human nature’; the belief that certain physical attributes are common to all men; the concept of a human unity made up of diverse elements; the rejection of traditional divisions between men as artificial and relative, not natural or absolute; the picture of ‘civilised man’ as the human norm. We have seen that among an intellectual minority some of these trends of thought led towards an egalitarian outlook far removed from the traditional Greek point of view. If the ideas voiced by Protagoras, Antiphon and the medical writers had persisted and spread, they would have gone far towards undermining the accepted discriminations and prejudices which shaped the prevailing contemporary picture of mankind. This, however, is not the main development that we find in thinkers after the fifth century B.C. The actual sequel, very different from egalitarianism, owed its derivation principally to another line of thought—the attitude chiefly represented by Socrates.
At first glance Socrates might be regarded as having nothing to say that concerns us here. He avoided wide horizons, and notoriously confined his movements and activities to his beloved Athens. He wrote nothing that has survived, and we know of no pronouncement of his about mankind as a whole; yet he had a profound influence on Greek ideas about the unity and the division of the human race.
The parodos of the Frogs is one of the most controversial passages in Aristophanes. Was it intended to parody the Eleusinian Mystery procession—or some other ritual? A writer wishing to discuss any part of the parodos must first outline his position with regard to this basic problem. I shall therefore as simply and briefly as possible state my own view and the reasons for it before dealing with the specific question posed by the title of the article.