To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In some situations, it is convenient to apply modifications to the conventional digital PAM scheme, in order to achieve desired properties of the transmit signal and/or in order to modify the demodulation process. First, we have a look at the crest factor or peak-to-average power ratio of the transmit signal, which should be as low as possible. In this context, offset QAM, minimum-shift keying, and Gaussian minimum-shift keying are studied. Moreover, the replacement of the coherent I/Q demodulator by different principles is addressed. First, “carrierless” amplitude and phase modulation is treated as an alternative approach to PAM. Here, no explicit mixing of the pulse-shaped continuous-time baseband signal to the RF domain is required. Second, in some cases (e.g., fiber-optical transmission), coherent reception is possible in principle but very costly. Here it is desired that even when demodulating without phase information (i.e., by conducting energy detection), a performance close to a coherent receiver is enabled. We study in detail an advanced scheme, called the Kramers–Kronig coherent receiver, which meets this aim by performing more complex operations at the digital part.
The appendix defines the data model used throughout the book and describes what can best be called an algorithmic design specification, that is, the functional and graphical characterization of an algorithm, chosen so that it can be translated to a computer architecture (be it in soft- or in hardware). We follow hereby a powerful “data flow model” that generalizes the classical signal flow graphs and that can be further formalized to generate the information necessary for the subsequent computer system design at the architectural level (i.e., the assignment of operations, data transfer and memory usage). The model provides for a natural link between mathematical operations and architectural representations. It is, at the same token, well adapted to the generation of parallel processing architectures.
The chapter shows how classical interpolation problems of various types (Schur, Nevanlinna–Pick, Hermite–Fejer) carry over and generalize to the time-variant and/or matrix situation. We show that they all reduce to a single generalized constrained interpolation problem, elegantly solved by time-variant scattering theory. An essential ingredient is the definition of the notion of valuation for time-variant systems, thereby generalizing the notion of valuation in the complex plane provided by the classical z-transform.
In practice, sometimes an estimate of the carrier phase for coherent signal reception is not possible with sufficient accuracy or carrier phase synchronization is not possible at all, in particular, in situations of very fast varying channel conditions (e.g., Doppler effect due to fast-moving transmitters or receivers). For such scenarios, digital transmission schemes have to be applied which are robust to non-perfect carrier frequency and carrier phase estimation. To that end we consider differential PSK which can tolerate phase errors and, to some amount, frequency errors. Then, schemes, which does not require phase (and frequency) synchronization at all, so-called non-coherent demodulation schemes, are developed and analyzed in detail.
This chapter introduces a different kind of problem, namely direct constrained matrix approximation via interpolation, the constraint being positive definiteness. It is the problem of completing a positive definite matrix for which only a well-ordered partial set of entries is given (and also giving necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of the completion) or, alternatively, the problem of parametrizing positive definite matrices. This problem can be solved elegantly when the specified entries contain the main diagonal and further entries crowded along the main diagonal with a staircase boundary. This problem turns out to be equivalent to a constrained interpolation problem defined for a causal contractive matrix, with staircase entries again specified as before. The recursive solution calls for the development of a machinery known as scattering theory, which involves the introduction of nonpositive metrics and the use of J-unitary transformations where J is a sign matrix.
This chapter presents an alternative theory of external and coprime factorization, using polynomial denominators in the noncommutative time-variant shift Z rather than inner denominators as done in the chapter on inner–outer theory. “Polynomials in the shift Z” are equivalent to block-lower matrices with a support defined by a (block) staircase, and are essentially different from the classical matrix polynomials of module theory, although the net effect on system analysis is remarkably similar. The polynomial method differs substantially and in a complementary way from the inner method. It is computationally simpler but does not use orthogonal transformations. It offers the possibility of treating highly unstable systems using unilateral series. Also, this approach leads to famous Bezout equations that, as mentioned in the abstract of Chapter 7, can be derived without the benefit of Euclidean divisibility methods.
A general view on digital modulation schemes beyond the concept of PAM is developed. This is required as many important modulation formats (e.g., digital frequency modulation) do not fall under the umbrella of PAM. To that end, the separation between the operations of coding and modulation is unambiguously defined. The key tool for the analysis and synthesis of transmission schemes is the representation of signals in a signal space. The concept is introduced and discussed in detail. Based on this view, methods for optimum coherent and non-coherent signal reception for any kind of general digital modulation scheme are derived. The principles of maximum-likelihood detection and maximum-likelihood sequence detection are discussed.
This chapter is on elementary matrix operations using a state-space or, equivalently, quasi-separable representation. It is a straightforward but unavoidable chapter. It shows how the recursive structure of the state-space representations is exploited to make matrix addition, multiplication and elementary inversion numerically efficient. The notions of outer operator and inner operator are introduced as basic types of matrices playing a central role in various specific matrix decompositions and factorizations to be treated in further chapters.
This chapter considers likely the most important operation in system theory: inner–outer and its dual, outer–inner factorization. These factorizations play a different role than the previously treated external or coprime factorizations, in that they characterize properties of the inverse or pseudo-inverse of the system under consideration, rather than the system itself. Important is that such factorizations are computed on the state-space representation of the original, that is, the original data. Inner–outer (or outer–inner) factorization is nothing but recursive “QR factorization,” as was already observed in our motivational Chapter 2, and outer–inner is recursive “LQ factorization,” in the somewhat unorthodox terminology used in this book for consistency reasons: QR for “orthogonal Q with a right factor R? and LQ for a “left factor” L with orthogonal Q?. These types of factorizations play the central role in a variety of applications (e.g., optimal tracking, state estimation, system pseudo-inversion, and spectral factorization) to be treated in the following chapters. We conclude the chapter showing how the time-variant, linear results generalize to the nonlinear case.
The most basic and most widely used form of mapping binary information to a physical transmit signal and back is digital pulse-amplitude modulation (PAM). As the name suggests, here the information is carried in the (complex-valued) amplitude of a basic pulse. We deal with real-valued and complex-valued amplitude coefficients in a unified manner. Thus, all kinds of baseband (amplitude-shift keying (ASK)) and carrier-modulated (quadrature-amplitude modulation (QAM) and phase-shift keying (PSK)) signal formats are included in the concept of PAM. PAM is the simplest form of digital modulation but establishes the basis for enhanced variants discussed in subsequent chapters. In this chapter, the focus is on modulation and demodulation operations. As, in a first approach, no channel coding is considered, modulation reduces to a symbol-by-symbol mapping of blocks of binary source symbols to signal points and detection at the receiver side can also be performed symbol by symbol. Strategies for optimum signal detection and conditions for continuous transmission of sequences of symbols without intersymbol interference (ISI) over non-dispersive channels are precisely developed.