To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
During the early winter of 1955, well-known travel writer William W. Yates of the Chicago Daily Tribune paused to reflect on the state of commercial aviation in the ten years since the end of World War II. Every five seconds saw the takeoff of a propeller-driven airliner on a long-distance flight that would take passengers and cargo across continents and oceans. Flying through all types of weather to one of the 3,500 international airports around the world was as routine as driving a car along Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. More than 324 million passengers had taken flight since 1945. Propeller-driven airliners had turned the “ocean of the air” into a “highway for the traffic of all nations.” Yates acknowledged that aircraft capable of flying “higher, faster, and farther” made that worldwide travel revolution possible. The technology at that crucial intersection of altitude, speed, and range found in modern high performance aircraft since the 1930s was the propeller.
As one of the most important innovations of the Aeronautical Revolution, the variable-pitch propeller was a transformative technology that made the modern airplane a weapon of war and instrument of global travel through the rapid onset of the Air Age during the 1940s and 1950s. That triumph was the result of the perseverance of propeller specialists over the preceding two decades. Ironically, within twenty years after World War II, a significant portion of the aeronautical community and society in general came to consider the propeller an obsolete relic of aviation's past. The variable-pitch propeller was no longer a technology capable of making commercial and military airplanes fly even higher, faster, and farther. With the introduction of the jet, a new cultural resistance against the continued use and further refinement of the propeller emerged.
Modern Propellers at War
During the 1940s, nations in Asia, Europe, and North America fought each other around the world with airplanes that were, at their technical foundations, the product of the interwar period. The Aeronautical Revolution of the 1920s and 1930s created the modern airplane and World War II solidified its position as a global technology. It was clear that the revolution in propeller design and construction was well over by the spring of 1941.
The first variable-pitch propeller developed in the United States took to the air over southern California as America entered World War I in April 1917. Pioneer aviator Earl S. Daugherty flew his Daugherty-Stupar Tractor biplane with a variable-pitch propeller designed by Los Angeles inventors Seth Hart and Robert I. Eustis (Figure 7). Starting off with a low pitch setting for high thrust, he gradually increased the pitch of the propeller to generate more speed as the plane leveled off over the airfield. Daugherty was “very much impressed” with the propeller's effect on his airplane's performance. The new propeller was controlled manually by the pilot, meaning that it relied on a series of mechanical linkages and the strength of the pilot to change the pitch. Daugherty's flights were the American propeller community's first steps toward developing a practical variable-pitch mechanism. That work, combined with the efforts of other experimenters in North America and Europe, met varying degrees of success between 1917 and 1927.
World War I served as a catalyst for the reinvention of the airplane in Europe and the United States, but the path and direction that new technology would take, as well as the nature of the organizations that used it, were not clear. In the United States, the newly created Army Air Service was at a crossroads regarding the primary role of military aviation in the postwar period. A tension existed between the old Army leadership, who favored using airplanes in a supplementary tactical role, and the youthful Air Service officers who sought to create an entirely new military doctrine based on strategic bombing. As this internal battle played out, the Army Air Service's strategy was to focus on wide-ranging improvements that enhanced the speed, range, load, and maneuverability of observation airplanes, bombers, fighters, transports, trainers, even airships. One of the key technologies for the service's future airplane – no matter what its role – would be the propeller.
The aeronautical community was aware of the potential value of controllable and reversible variable-pitch propellers. Controllable-pitch mechanisms offered enhanced operating performance and fuel economy at the different operating regimes of takeoff and cruise for both single- and multiengine aircraft.
Just as the American aviation industry started to grow in the wake of ground-breaking government legislation and Lindbergh's transatlantic flight, the stock market crash of October 1929 and the Great Depression threatened its continued existence. The newly formed Hamilton Standard Propeller Corporation, suffering from dwindling military and commercial contracts, scrambled for a new product to sustain itself. Chief engineer, Frank Caldwell, designed a hydraulic two-position, controllable-pitch, or hydro-controllable, propeller that promised to increase Hamilton Standard's place in the aviation marketplace. His new propeller used the engine's oil supply and centrifugal force exerted by counterweights to keep the blades at the desired pitch during flight. Eugene E. Wilson, the president of Hamilton Standard, knew instantly the propeller was an innovation the corporation desired and was looking for, which in his words, was “the answer to a maiden's prayer.” He enthusiastically supported the development of the two-position, controllable-counterweight design, which was an extreme financial undertaking during the Great Depression. The innovation was both an investment in the further improvement of the airplane and the financial fortunes of the company.
The creation of an industrial propeller community within the context of the emergence of the modern aviation corporation in the late 1920s made the variable-pitch propeller possible. Overall, from the end of World War I to the mid-1920s, the foundation of the American aviation industry changed from one that traced back to individual pioneers such as Wilbur and Orville Wright and Glenn Curtiss to one based on a mainstream American corporate model characterized by heavy Wall Street involvement. The modern variable-pitch propeller required the necessary managerial, financial, technical, and personnel infrastructure that only a corporate environment could provide, but that in turn meant the innovation had to have the potential for financial success. An understanding of that vital interrelationship is crucial to a broader understanding of the development of aeronautical technology in the 1920s and 1930s.
The momentum begun by government aviation legislation and the technical and symbolic success of Lindbergh's transatlantic flight contributed to the creation of modern aviation corporations in the United States in 1929. The struggling aviation industry, a collection of small businesses catering to a limited specialty market, underwent a period of rapid growth marked by consolidation into corporations with impressive financial, technical, and managerial resources.
Aviation journalist Carl Dienstbach traveled to Dayton in July 1905 to interview the world's leading aeronautical technologists. Beginning in 1896, Wilbur and Orville worked to invent the first airplane through a synergy of the technical systems of lift, control, structures, and propulsion, which culminated in the December 17, 1903 flight of their Flyer at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. In the process, Wilbur and Orville created the first practical, efficient, and purpose-built aerial propellers and a design theory to support them. Acknowledging their ability to design an efficient propeller according to their aerodynamic principles, Wilbur still recognized the limitations of their invention. He informed Dienstbach that “the best propeller for starting is not the best for flying.” The elder Wright's statement highlighted the fact that the technology that turned the engine's power into thrust and enabled aircraft to take to the air was far from meeting the needs of aviation.
The Wrights were the leading members of a distinct community of American and European technologists that created the airplane in the late nineteenth century. Their efforts provided the basis from which modern flight evolved. They chose the wood, fixed-pitch propeller as its standard through their adherence to the already established design paradigms of light weight and simplicity. At the same time, this early flight community took the Wrights’ original creation and attempted to change its composition as well as its ability to alter pitch.
The Early History of the Propeller
The idea of how an airplane propeller might work existed for centuries in human history. The Greek mathematician and engineer Archimedes described a method of transporting water uphill through the helical motion of his “water screw” during the third century BCE. The emergence of propeller-like windmills in Western Europe in the twelfth century CE indicated a reverse understanding of the principles and capabilities of thrust. Their builders used wind-driven wood-framed and fabric-covered blades, called sails, to create power for agricultural purposes. The inventor-philosopher-artist Leonardo da Vinci sketched an “aerial screw” in the late fifteenth century that was a precursor of the helicopter. Though mainly conceptual, these ideas influenced the development of both marine and aerial propellers. Seagoing ships, lighter-than-air balloons and airships, and the fanciful flying machines from the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries all featured various forms of propellers.
The origin and the development of scientific disciplines has been a topic of reflection for several decades. The few extensive case studies support the thesis that scientific disciplines are not monolithic structures but can be characterized by distinct social, organizational and scientific–technical practices. Nonetheless, most disciplinary histories of genetics confine themselves largely to an uncontested account of the content of the discipline or occasionally institutional factors. Little attention is paid to the large number of researchers who, by their joint efforts, ultimately shaped the discipline. We contribute to this aspect of disciplinary historiography by discussing the role of women researchers at the Institute for Heredity Research, founded in 1914 in Berlin under the directorship of Erwin Baur, and the sister of the John Innes Institute at Cambridge. This paper investigates how and why Baur built a highly successful research programme that relied on the efforts of his female staff, whose careers, notably Elisabeth Schiemann's, are also assessed in toto. These women undertook the necessary ‘technoscience’ and in some cases innovative work and helped increase the prestige of the institute and its director. Together they played a pivotal role in the establishment of genetics in Germany. Without them the discipline would have developed much more slowly and along a divergent path.
Freud may never have set foot in Cambridge - that hub for the twentieth century's most influential thinkers and scientists - but his intellectual impact there in the years between the two World Wars was immense. This is a story that has long languished untold, buried under different accounts of the dissemination of psychoanalysis. John Forrester and Laura Cameron present a fascinating and deeply textured history of the ways in which a set of Freudian ideas about the workings of the human mind, sexuality and the unconscious affected Cambridge men and women - from A. G. Tansley and W. H. R. Rivers to Bertrand Russell, Bernal, Strachey and Wittgenstein - shaping their thinking across a range of disciplines, from biology to anthropology, and from philosophy to psychology, education and literature. Freud in Cambridge will be welcomed as a major intervention by literary scholars, historians and all readers interested in twentieth-century intellectual and scientific life.