To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
How to breed successfully, how to avoid disease, and how to live to a decent age are questions that have perplexed our ancestors throughout recorded time. As humans explored new lifestyles and habitats, each new challenge – whether it was agriculture, urban living, colonisation of new territories, domestication of animals, or industrialisation – could have notable rewards but was usually fraught with unpredictable physiological penalties. The history of our species is marked by technical solutions that have made these problems of human biology bearable. Some originated in common sense – the piped water and closed sewers of the nineteenth-century metropolis – and others in the application of science, but even these could sometimes produce less-than-satisfactory outcomes and, in some instances, disaster.
The idea of this book is to examine some of these adventures through the lens of twentieth-century biomedicine and to identify the risks and the rewards involved in each. During the first decade of the last century, crucial developments were afoot; philanthropists and eventually governments were recognising the importance of biomedical science and beginning to devise a financial infrastructure that could support its progress. This process gained an irresistible momentum after the Second World War, when the American government undertook unprecedented investment in the life sciences. Within three decades, profound insights into inheritance and cell biology gave us the powerful tools needed to establish a gene technology industry.
Humane solutions to the problems of damaged bodies have always been the realm of surgeons. After the discoveries of antiseptic surgery and anaesthesia in the nineteenth century, surgical practice could make moderately safe and pain-free contributions to improved health care. However, with characteristic boldness, surgeons quickly extended their activities to other predicaments. Blood transfusion became increasingly routine in the 1920s and eventually had an enormous impact on most areas of medicine. More recently, open-heart surgery and organ transplantation have enabled many individuals to overcome congenital defects and chronic disease, extending their lives by many years. Bone marrow grafts have permitted cures of blood cancers and a variety of genetic diseases. Stem cell science and other aspects of cell biology have inaugurated the age of tissue engineering, which may have huge potential for the renovation of nervous and muscular tissues. Spectacular advances in techniques for refurbishing the body are not made without extraordinary audacity and risk.
The Surgical Tradition
The diary of Samuel Pepys describes how, in 1658, after several years of excruciating discomfort, he bravely decides that his bladder stone must be removed. Completely aware of the hideous unpleasantness of the operation, he sees the risks as preferable to the misery the condition will bring to the rest of his life. A few skilled surgeons existed in London at the time who evidently specialised in this operation with reasonable success.
Great epidemics of the past occurred following a collision between a rampant microbe and a totally defenceless population living in circumstances in which the disease could spread freely. The enormous menace of HIV and the prion diseases originate in the novelty of their disease-causing capability and their ability to exploit weaknesses in our hygienic arrangements. Other formerly dangerous diseases still have an undiminished ability to kill humans on a large scale. Malaria – less menacing outside of Africa than in former times – remains one of the world's greatest health problems. Tuberculosis is, in principle, curable, but the difficulty of implementing effective treatment means that it persists. Indeed, it infects one-third of the world's population, and in HIV infected people it is now creating a severe danger. The influenza virus has a history of creating unpleasant surprises, but it is now under control because of a remarkable surveillance and vaccination program. Bioterrorism makes health officials nervous. Complacent in our belief that smallpox has been eradicated, and with our immunity to smallpox steadily diminishing, we could be vulnerable to bioterrorists. The important lesson of the last thirty years is that we should never assume that microbial enemies are vanquished and should recognise that microbes exploit chinks in our hygienic armour.
Should We Worry about Unknown Infectious Enemies?
Industrial countries with well-developed sanitation and public health systems are no longer at risk from the old villains such as plague, cholera, and typhus, but new infectious diseases can still surprise us.
The twentieth century will be remembered as the era when mankind first glimpsed an answer to life's most thought-provoking question: How is life handed on? The key, unknown until fifty years ago, lies in the singular chemical character of DNA (or, in a few cases, RNA), from which every inheritable feature of every organism originates. DNA can replicate to allow genetic information to be passed on to each succeeding generation and is also the primary template for making the protein products in almost every living organism. Most of our genetic information originates in chromosomes selected from the parental sets, but specific maternal and paternal contributions also exist.
DNA Transmits Genetic Information
Once scientists started to understand how the characteristics of animals and plants were inherited, they inevitably wondered what part of a cell carried genetic information. The answer to this profoundly important question came from an unexpected quarter – a lowly pneumonia-causing microbe called Pneumococcus – and the penetrating insight of a clinical pathologist, Fred Griffith, in London in 1929. In order to understand his esoteric discovery, one needs to know that disease-causing Pneumococci, when cultured in a bacteriologist's Petri dish, grow as smooth slimy-looking colonies; colonies of harmless strains have a rough appearance. Griffith's interest was aroused by the curious outcome of an experiment. Mice had been injected with the “rough” harmless variety of Pneumococcus together with sterilised cells of the “smooth,” disease-causing version of the same bug.
The strangely audacious notion that human sickness could be cured with concoctions made from natural products existed in most ancient civilisations. This fantastic dream began to come true in the twentieth century, as chemistry and pharmacology were harnessed to make reproducibly effective versions of folk medicines. Prospects for discovering useful drugs greatly improved with the discovery of the first antibiotics and the realisation that these were representatives of a chemical universe of hitherto unimagined richness containing molecules of extraordinary biological potency. With inspiration from nature and growing sophistication, synthetic chemists have learnt how to generate vast libraries of chemicals, which the drug discovery industry screens for useful medicines. We will consider the prospects of protein medicines in the following chapter.
The Power of Chemistry
Experimentation with the physiological effects of natural products must be as old as human civilisation. Alcohol, narcotics, mind-affecting drugs, poisons, and many other natural products with pharmacological effects were widely known in ancient times. More puzzling, though, is why the ancients thought these products might cure human sickness. The ancient Egyptian Ebers' papyrus lists many medicines; whether they were efficacious we shall never know, but the betting must surely be not. One offering contains human excrement! The puritanical Hebrews, who would have known the Egyptian predilection for medicine, seemed to reject this kind of hocus-pocus along with alcohol.
In the developed world, human life expectancy has more than doubled in the last two centuries and is still increasing. The trend may not be sustainable, but life expectancy is evidently continually improving. Our bodies intrinsically lack the resources to provide foolproof maintenance long after our reproductive years, but our individual capacities are notably variable because of the heterogeneity of our genetic legacies and our life experiences. Even before birth, nutritional stress, toxic substances, and viral infections can have effects on the development of the foetus that will shorten an adult life span. After birth, accumulation of somatic mutations – sometimes originating in poor nutrition or chronic inflammation – creates a risk of cancer and other diseases of late middle age and may advance the ageing process. However, although our bodies may be unable to repair all biochemical damage, we can, in principle, reduce some of the risk to health and life expectancy it imposes.
New health challenges originating in life experience still emerge. Breast cancer, allergic reactions, and obesity are three very different kinds of health threat that are becoming increasingly common in the developed world. Breast cancer was well known before the twentieth century, but the lifetime risk of developing such a malignancy in Britain and the United States (and probably in many other countries) has now reached one in eight.
A revolutionary nursery for their progeny in an internal organ is the immense evolutionary advance by which mammals escaped the desperate profligacy of lower vertebrate life. By abandoning yolk as a food for the embryo and becoming dependent on the mother for nutrition through the placenta, mammals made a huge step forward in reproductive efficiency. For human parents who invest such hope in every pregnancy, the possibility that a mother may carry to term a child burdened with an imperfection makes procreation a poignant lottery. The development of the foetus may be affected adversely by poor nutrition, premature birth, or genetic damage, and consequently the child's true physical potential dictated by the genes may not be not realised. At birth, most of the genetic program is completed, but an infant's growth continues for many years after birth, following a trajectory set early in life.
The Perfect Nursery?
Imagine the reproduction of fish and frogs. Eggs are laid in thousands; the likelihood of fertilisation is low; the progeny are easily eaten, infected, or poisoned. However, if more than a few are fertilised and survive, the species prospers. Reproductive duties complete, the parents of these lucky few abandon their progeny to the lonely battle for survival. Mammals avoid this wasteful lottery. Eggs are fertilised with more certainty, and the resulting embryo is raised in an extraordinary high-grade “nursery,” in relative safety.
Hundreds of different types of cell, each based on a single design and all derived from one fertilised egg, make up our bodies. Their sheer variety, exquisite minuteness, versatility, and fortitude make cells truly extraordinary. Our entire existence depends on the actions of cells with precisely defined roles that are performed at very particular places in our bodies, governed by a vast network of chemical messages. Ultimately, a cellular clock determines how many times they can divide, and a program exists that can sacrifice cells for the benefit of the entire bodily organisation. When we are sick, it is really our cells that are sick, and it is in cells that scientists look for the immediate cause of most diseases. This chapter is concerned with the strengths and weaknesses of cells in health and disease.
The Architecture of Cells
Just as powerful telescopes revolutionised our perception of our place in the solar system, so advances in microscopy revolutionised perceptions of our material character. Early nineteenth-century microscopists realised that all living things are made up of cells and that only division of preexisting cells could generate more cells. The immensely influential Prussian biologist Rudolph Virchow was one of the first to absorb this lesson and to see that more was to be gained in studying pathology by looking at cells than by looking at the gross anatomy of cadavers.
Infectious disease used to be the major brake on population growth. Nobody was free of risk, but children and women in childbirth were especially vulnerable. This dismal situation improved in industrial societies of the nineteenth century because of a host of social advances, including improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and housing and better understanding of hygienic principles. Although the potential of vaccination was known in the early nineteenth century, mass immunisation and antibiotics contributed importantly only after 1940. We now have weapons of enormous power that drastically reduce the incidence of infection and terminate ongoing infections, such as blood poisoning and pneumonia, that formerly took so many lives. However, the public health officials of the 1960s who complacently rejoiced in the success of preventative medicine would have been surprised to know how frequently new diseases would emerge in the subsequent forty years.
Historic Epidemics
Nobody knows exactly when infectious disease became a great threat to human existence, but the first settled communities were probably much more vulnerable to devastating epidemics than their nomadic ancestors. Demographers believe that although the birth rate was high, these communities grew slowly and spasmodically because of periodic outbreaks of disease. Without efficient sanitation, sound hygienic practices, or immunity to these diseases, human societies were always at the mercy of microbes, a susceptibility greatly increased by malnutrition. The Old Testament is, again, an indication of the perceptions of an ancient people (see Fig. 9.1).
The recently completed draft of the human genome sequence is literally a vision of the genetic legacy of our species, revealing the relentless evolution of DNA as millions of differences in base sequence between different individuals. These differences create the diversity of appearance and character of individual humans that is an important part of the texture of the human condition, and also the origin of genetic disease. With perhaps one in thirty births in the industrial world adversely affected to some degree by genetic disorders, what should be done about this burden? Must we accept the cruelty of fate, or is it a humane and proper thing to find solutions for those who suffer from these distressing conditions? For those who know that they carry a genetic disease, the problems of parenting are especially poignant. Most geneticists believe it is a mark of our humanity to fight the dismal consequences of genetic disease rather than to accept them passively. Surgery or organ transplantation, appropriate diet, and replacement therapy can correct, to an extent, some of these disorders. However, avoiding the birth of genetically damaged children is becoming an increasingly realistic, if controversial, option.
The Burden of Genetic Disease
There can be few parental heartaches greater than the implacable advance of a genetic disease slowly crushing a child's unique personality.
When our hunter-gatherer ancestors exchanged their timeless wanderings for the momentous opportunities of agriculture, they adopted a lifestyle of which they had had no previous evolutionary experience. This had significant consequences for their nutrition, their reproduction, their susceptibility to infection, and for the development of their children. As they became the dominant life form on the planet, they gained increasing control of the environment, but an understanding of the biology of their own species has eluded them until comparatively recently. In this introductory chapter, we shall explore episodes in our history in which remarkable institutions were established that made possible unprecedented insights into human biology.
Leaving Eden
For more than a hundred millennia our species has roamed the earth multiplying slowly, subsisting on animal and plant food, constantly adapting to changes in climate and to potential prey. We know little of their lives except that the Cro-Magnon people, the immediate ancestors of Europeans, hunted big game with what seems a mystical enthusiasm and buried their dead with some reverence. By the end of the last Ice Age, the herds of deer had dwindled away and human populations were reduced at one point to perhaps just 10,000 pairs, while our Neanderthal cousins became extinct. When the ice receded, the survivors' frugal existence, dependent on small animals and plant foods, began to improve as they learnt to grow plants and to manage domesticated animals.
Cancer, one of the defining personal anxieties of the twentieth century, is also one of the greatest biological puzzles that confront humanity. Perhaps a single cell, out of the trillions of cells in the body, starts a kind of rebellion against the great plan that gives each cell its identity. More genetic changes follow in the same cell or its descendants, to establish a dangerous malignancy. Biologists see the disease as a Darwinian struggle between the anarchic and outrageous stratagems of malignant cells and the organisational forces of the body. Probably only 20 percent of the risk of cancer is inherited; the remainder originates in life experiences that cause the genetic changes that start these insidious chain reactions. Like the ageing process considered in the last chapter, cancer originates in the absence of maintenance that is totally effective. Cancer is the most complicated and scientifically difficult disease we face, but our understanding is advancing sufficiently to allow hope for really effective control of ongoing cancers and the identification of environmental cues that initiate the disease.
Twentieth-Century Nightmare
In the generation that reached middle age in the early twentieth century, the family was frequently faced with cancer for the first time in its collective memory. No remedies or palliative care could ease a terrible illness that often struck when its victims were still in their prime.
By
Mouldy Sioud, Department of Immunology, Molecular Medicine Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital,
Dag R. Sørensen, Department of Immunology, Molecular Medicine Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital
Novel tools for evaluating gene function in vivo such as ribozymes and RNA interference (RNAi) are emerging as the most highly effective strategies (Sioud, 2001; Sioud, 2004; Hannon, 2002). RNAi is sequence-specific posttranscriptional gene silencing, which is triggered by double stranded RNA (dsRNA). This evolutionally conserved gene-silencing pathway triggered by dsRNAs was first described in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans (Fire et al., 1998). This process has been linked to many previously described phenomena such as post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) in plants (Jorgensen, 1990). The difficulty of using RNAi in somatic mammalian cells was overcome when Tuschl and colleagues discovered that siRNAs (21 nt), normally generated from long dsRNA during RNAi, could be used to inhibit specific gene targets (Elbashir et al., 2001). Currently, there is a great interest in the use of small interfering RNA as a research tool to study gene function and drug target validation (Dykxhoorn et al., 2003; Sørensen et al., 2003).
The therapeutic application of siRNAs, however, is largely dependent on the development of a delivery vehicle that can efficiently deliver the siRNAs to target cells. In addition, such delivery vehicles should be administered efficiently, safely and repeatedly. Cationic liposomes represent one of the few examples that can meet these requirements (Templeton, 2002). These agents are composed of positively charged lipid bilayers, and can be complexed to negatively charged siRNA duplexes. The routes of delivery include direct injection (e.g. intratumoral), intravenous, intraperitoneal, intraarterial, intracranial, and others.
By
Oded Singer, Laboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute,
Gustavo Tiscornia, Laboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute,
Inder Verma, Laboratory of Genetics, The Salk Institute
A major challenge in the post genomic era of biology is to decipher the molecular function of over 30,000 genes. The gene knock-out by homologous recombination has proven to be very useful but is laborious and expensive. RNA interference has recently emerged as a novel pathway that allows modulation of gene expression. The basic biology of RNAi is described in the next section. Briefly, long dsRNA molecules are processed by the endonuclease Dicer into short 21–23 nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which are then incorporated into RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex), a multi-component nuclease complex that selects and degrades mRNAs that are homolgous to the dsRNA initially delivered (Fjose et al., 2001; Hannon, 2002). In mammalian systems, synthetic siRNA's can be delivered exogenously (Elbashir et al., 2001) or can be expressed endogenously from RNA Pol III promoters, resulting in a powerful tool for achieving specific downregulation of target mRNA's (Miyagashi and Taira, 2002; Paul et al., 2002; Oliviera and Goodell, 2003). The delivery of synthetic siRNAs to cells in culture is hampered by limitations in transfection efficiency for many cell types and the transient nature of the silencing effect. In vivo, delivering siRNAs to target cells is difficult due to lack of stability of siRNA and low uptake efficiency in the absence of transfection agents (Isacson et al., 2003). Thus in order to apply this potent technique to both basic biological questions and therapeutic strategies, efficient siRNA delivery methods must be developed.
In eukaryotic organisms, RNA interference (RNAi) is the sequence-specific gene silencing that is induced by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) homologous to the silenced gene. In the cytoplasm of mammalian cells, long dsRNAs (>30 nt) can activate the potent interferon and a protein kinase-mediated pathway, which lead to non-sequence-specific effects that can include apoptosis (Kumar and Carmichael, 1998). Elbashir and coworkers (2001a) made the important discovery that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of about 21 nt specifically inhibit gene expression, because siRNAs are too short to activate the interferon or protein kinase pathway. The silencing by synthetic siRNAs is transient. This limitation can be overcome by stably expressed short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), which are processed by Dicer into siRNAs (Paddison et al., 2002; Brummelkamp et al., 2002). However, it was recently reported that shRNA vectors can induce an interferon response (Bridge et al., 2003).
Because target recognition presumably depends on Watson-Crick base pairing, the RNAi machinery is widely believed to be exquisitely specific. As a reverse genetic tool, RNAi has set the standard in high-throughput functional genomics (Barstead, 2001; Tuschl, 2003). RNAi has also become an important tool in the identification and validation of drug targets in preclinical therapeutic development (Thompson, 2002; Appasani, 2003). Furthermore, RNAi-based human therapeutics are under development.
Initial empirical rules have been established by the Tuschl lab for the design of siRNAs. However, large variation in the potency of siRNAs is commonly observed, and often only a small proportion of the tested siRNAs are effective.