To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Scientific names, abbreviations and body mass data for mammal species referred to in the text, tables and figures
Mean and maximum live mass reported for sexually mature animals of each sex are given (where sufficient data are available). A range of values is indicated where body mass varies significantly between different populations of the species. Figures in brackets represent guestimates. The asymptotic body mass for each sex is taken to be the average of the mean and maximum masses. The population mean mass per individual for all age classes is taken to be three-quarters of the mean adult female mass.
For an expanding population to be transformed into a stable one, density dependent changes must occur either in rates of recruitment, in population losses, or in both (Caughley 1977). Recruitment can decline due to (i) a decline in female fecundity, brought about by reduced litter sizes, or increased intervals between births; (ii) higher post-natal losses; or (iii) ages at first parturition being retarded. Losses can increase due to (i) increased mortality, whether as the direct result of nutritional deficiencies, or as a result of predation or disease; or (ii) to increased emigration from the area.
Caughley & Krebs (1983) suggested that there is a fundamental dichotomy between the processes of population regulation in small mammals (under about 30 kg in body mass), and those operating in larger mammals. The former are regulated mainly by intrinsic mechanisms, i.e. by behavioral or physiological responses acting before food becomes limiting. In contrast, large mammals are regulated largely by extrinsic factors, such as the direct effects of food limitations on survival and reproduction.
Goodman (1981) emphasized that the population dynamics of large, long-lived mammals are much more sensitive to variations in annual survival rates than to corresponding variations in fecundity. These circumstances favor deferred reproduction as an adaptive response to adverse conditions.
Riney (1964) maintained that populations of large herbivores expanding from low densities in favorable habitats inevitably overshoot the carrying capacity of the vegetation.
A plant survives only where the annual environmental regime includes periods favourable for metabolism and growth and where, in the case of perennials, there are no periods of lethal stress. Most polar plants, vascular and non-vascular, are perennials, and must therefore show resistance to both elastic and plastic stress. Levitt (1980) defines a biological stress as ‘any environmental factor capable of inducing a potentially injurious strain in living organisms’: a plastic stress is one producing irreversible chemical or physical change, e.g. frost damage, while an elastic stress results in a reversible change such as a major reduction in net assimilation rate (NAR) under suboptimal conditions. This chapter begins to examine the features that enable bryophytes and lichens to survive under the apparently severe stress of Arctic and Antarctic environments. Such features include, first, general characteristics of these plants that confer fitness under polar conditions and, second, adaptations specific to polar species or populations which may therefore have evolved in response to local selection pressure.
Carbon dioxide exchange has been widely investigated to determine how polar cryptogams maintain positive carbon and energy budgets under adverse conditions. The results are not fully comparable due to differences in experimental procedure. Most methods have involved infrared gas analysis (IRGA) in the laboratory, either in open systems at ambient CO2 concentration (Oechel, 1976) or in sealed cuvettes (Larson & Kershaw, 1975a). The latter method allows greater replication but has the disadvantage that CO2 concentration inevitably fluctuates somewhat during the period of measurement. The relative merits of these systems have been discussed by Lange & Tenhunen (1981) and Kershaw (1985).
Definition and estimation Bryophytes and lichens are major elements in the tundra communities described in Chapter 2 in terms of cover and also energy flow, mineral nutrient cycling and other dynamic aspects of polar ecosystems. The part played by bryophytes has been briefly reviewed (Longton, 1984). Here we shall explore the role of both groups in greater detail, beginning with the contribution of cryptogams to production and phytomass.
Phytomass is the amount of plant material present, and thus potentially available to consumers and decomposers. Vascular plant phytomass comprises above- and below-ground components, the latter including living and dead, and the former green, other living, standing dead and litter. Only photosynthetic (green) and non-photosynthetic components can realistically be distinguished in many cryptogams because of difficulties in determining how far living tissue extends into the colonies (Chapter 6), and most published estimates of living phytomass probably represent the green component. Mosses and lichens decompose from the base with little surface litter deposition. Phytomass varies seasonally, particularly in flowering plants; the value recorded near the end of the growing season is that most commonly reported.
Above-ground phytomass is determined by harvesting and dry-weighing plants from sample plots of known area, those for cryptogams normally comprising cores through colonies of one or an assemblage of species. The results are extrapolated to phytomass per unit area assuming continuous cover, and this value multiplied by percentage cover indicates phytomass of the species concerned in the community. Below-ground phytomass is assessed from cores through the phanerogamic rooting zone.
Solar radiation exerts a pervasive influence on plant–environment relationships, supplying the energy available for photosynthesis and controlling temperature and water regimes in the microclimate of lowgrowing cryptogamic vegetation. Microclimatic conditions differ dramatically from those indicated by standard meteorological recording, and must be analysed in many types of ecophysiological investigation. Walton (1984) has recently provided a critical review of microclimatic studies in the Antarctic.
All energy received at the earth's surface, apart from a small amount of geothermal heat, originates as solar radiation. The solar constant, i.e. the irradiance of a plane perpendicular to the sun's rays at the outer edge of the atmosphere and at the earth's mean distance from the sun, is approximately 8.4 J cm−2 min−1 (= 2.0 cal cm−2 min−1 or 1402 W m−2). Radiation receipt at the earth's surface varies widely in response to changes with latitude in the angle of solar elevation, in daylength regimes, and in attenuation of radiation during passage through the atmosphere.
The angle of solar elevation (Fig. 4.1), and therefore maximum irradiance, fall progressively from the tropics towards the poles. Daylength varies with latitude because the earth's axis of rotation is inclined in relation to its plane of revolution around the sun (Fig. 4.1), resulting in pronounced seasonality and relatively low diurnal fluctuation in solar irradiance in polar regions. At the northern summer solstice, regions north of the Arctic circle lie in the path of direct solar radiation 24 hours per day whereas south of the Antarctic circle there is no direct insolation, the converse being true at the northern winter solstice.
Patterns of growth in relation to assimilation and translocation
Bryophytes
Growth and net assimilation Positive net photosynthesis tends to increase dry weight due to accumulation of assimilate. In this chapter we are concerned with the translation of this process into growth, in the sense of increase in plant size. Adaptations that permit positive net assimilation at substantial rates under severe environmental conditions are commonly viewed as the key to plant success in polar regions (e.g. Mooney, 1976), and considerable effort has been directed towards investigating environmental relationships of CO2 exchange in mosses and lichens. As discussed in Chapter 5, the results confirm that polar species in situ are able to photosynthesise at reasonable rates, but the assumption that assimilation would be maximised by a close correspondence between optimum conditions for net photosynthesis and the most frequently prevailing environmental conditions has not been fully substantiated (page 160; Lechowicz, 1981b). However, the parallel assumption, that survival is favoured by maximum rates of photosynthesis and growth, is not necessarily valid for plants with essentially opportunistic growth responses in environments where competition is not everywhere intense, and low stature may be advantageous.
Moreover, conditions promoting maximum NAR are often very different from those favouring growth in size. This is particularly true in polar species in which maximum NAR may occur at temperatures low enough to cause a severe depression of respiration, and probably other processes essential to growth. The latter may then be restricted more by direct limitation than by availability of assimilate, and adaptation further increasing net assimilation would be superfluous.
In this final chapter we shall consider first the reproductive biology of polar cryptogams, as an introduction to a discussion of life strategies and their significance in the origin and evolution of the polar floras. The emphasis is of necessity on bryophytes, as there have been few relevant studies on lichens (Smith, 1984a).
The bryophytes life history involves heteromorphic alternation of a haploid gametophyte and a diploid sporophyte, the latter permanently attached to and, nutritionally, partially dependent upon the gametophyte (Fig. 8.1). Gametophytes are monoecious, dioecious or occasionally heteroecious, depending on the species. In mosses, antheridia and archegonia develop in groups at the apices of leafy shoots in acrocarpous species, or of reduced lateral branches in pleurocarps. Groups of gametangia with their surrounding bracts are termed inflorescences, and are bisexual, or more commonly exclusively male (perigonia) or female (perichaetia). Female bracts in leafy liverworts fuse to form tubular perianths that eventually surround the developing sporophytes.
Each antheridium liberates many biflagellate sperm, and a single, nonmotile ovum develops in each archegonium. Where fertilisation occurs, repeated mitotic division of the zygote and its derivatives gives rise to the sporophyte, normally one per perichaetium. The mature sporophyte comprises a haustorial foot embedded in the gametophyte, and a slender stalk, the seta, on which the sporangium, or capsule, is borne several centimetres above the gametophyte. Meiosis occurs during sporogenesis, and several hundred thousand spores commonly develop synchronously within each capsule. Bryophytes with sporophytes are traditionally, if loosely, described as fruiting.
This book considers the biology of bryophytes and lichens in polar tundra and adjacent, open woodland, their contribution to the vegetation, their role in polar ecosystems, and their adaptations to the rigours of life in regions generally regarded as among the least hospitable on earth. Tundra is used here in the broad sense of treeless regions beyond climatic timberlines. It occurs in the polar regions as defined in Figs. 1.1 and 1.2, and in some alpine and oceanic areas at lower latitudes.
The polar regions are diverse in topography and climate. Arctic lands comprise substantial parts of the North American and Eurasian continents which, with Greenland and smaller islands, encircle a polar ocean (Fig. 1.1). The terrain ranges from extensive flat-bedded plains and plateaus to folded mountains, often high and imposing as in the Brooks Range, Alaska, where elevations reach over 2800 m (Figs. 1.3 and 1.4). Except in Greenland, contemporary glaciation is localised, and largely confined to Spitzbergen and other far-northern islands. In contrast, the Antarctic continent is centred over the pole and is surrounded by the vast expanse of the Southern Ocean, with a minimum width of over 850 km between the Antarctic Peninsula and Cape Horn (Fig. 1.2). The continent is fringed by coastal mountains, and rises to an inland ice-plateau at elevations of 1800 to 3800 m. Over 98% is currently buried beneath an ice sheet more than 4 km thick in places. Islands lying close by the mainland or widely scattered in the Southern Ocean thus provide the major terrestrial habitats in Antarctic regions, where vegetation is restricted to the almost universally rugged terrain of coastal regions.
Environmental relationships of polar cryptogamic vegetation
Evidence concerning environmental control over the distribution of polar bryophytes and lichens is largely circumstantial as it is derived principally from observed correlations between vegetation and environment, which do not necessarily imply direct control by the factors concerned. Moreover, distribution is influenced by complex combinations of climatic and other variables so that correlations may be difficult to elucidate.
Ordination provides a means of alleviating the latter difficulty, as demonstrated by Webber's (1978) study of Alaskan tundra. Webber showed that species richness among both bryophytes and lichens is highest under mesic to dry conditions with moderate soil phosphate levels, but that species richness for lichens shows a stronger correlation with good soil aeration than does that for mosses (Fig. 3.1). Different patterns were shown by species indices based on frequency and cover (Fig. 3.2), which reveal that bryophytes are most abundant under relatively wet conditions with poor soil aeration and low phosphate, whereas lichen abundance is greatest on drier, well aerated soils with moderate phosphate.
The analysis also provided valuable insight into the habitat preferences of individual species, but such techniques have not been widely applied to polar vegetation. In some instances, however, relationships between plant distribution and environment stand out so clearly that a controlling influence for the factors concerned may reasonably be inferred from simple observation. Other evidence comes from physiological studies, as discussed in Chapters 5 and 6.
This book is about bryophytes and lichens in the Arctic and Antarctic. It considers the evolution and adaptations of the polar floras, and the role of these plants in the vegetation and in the functioning of tundra ecosystems. The study of plant ecology in the polar regions has advanced dramatically in recent years as a result of work initiated in the Antarctic during the International Geophysical Year (1957–58), and in both Arctic and Antarctic as part of the International Biological Programme Tundra Biome investigations. Much attention has been focused on bryophytes and lichens because of their obvious abundance in local communities. The work has been broad in scope, ranging from phytogeography to physiological ecology, and from vegetation ecology to reproductive biology. The results, as synthesised here, are of relevance far beyond the polar regions, because they make a substantial contribution towards a general understanding of the environmental relationships of bryophytes and lichens. It should be noted, however, that mosses are of considerably greater ecological significance in the tundra than liverworts; they have consequently received more emphasis in research and therefore in the present text.
Authorities for most of the plant names cited in the text can be found in the following: mosses – D. M. Greene (1986), Steere (1978a); hepatics – Schuster (1966–80), Grolle (1972); lichens – Thomson (1984), Lindsay (1974); vascular plants – Greene & Walton (1975), Scoggan (1978–79). Where differences occur, the nomenclature used by the first-mentioned authority for each group has been followed.
Boundaries between communities based on the distribution and abundance of cryptogams and of flowering plants may only partially coincide, as Alpert & Oechel (1982) demonstrated in Alaska. The most useful vegetation accounts thus consider all the major plant groups. The procedures of the Braun-Blanquet school have been adopted to define vegetation types at isolated Antarctic localities (Kappen, 1985a), and more comprehensively on Svalbard (Philippi, 1973), in the Soviet cold-Arctic (Aleksandrova, in press), in Greenland (Daniëls, 1982, 1985), and on Marion and Prince Edward Is (Gremmen, 1982). In a rather different approach, some Arctic lichen communities have been delimited by principal component analysis (Kershaw & Rouse, 1973; Richardson & Finegan, 1977), or by an agglomerative technique that indicates diagnostic species (Sheard & Geale, 1983). Although appearing with increasing frequency (e.g. Bliss & Svoboda, 1984), such quantitative analyses cannot yet form the basis for a comprehensive, objective classification of polar vegetation because of the limited database and differences in methodology. Thus Brossard, Deruelle, Nimis & Petit (1984) used small sample plots (100cm2) to study lichen-dominated vegetation on Svalbard, and as a consequence recognised communities on a smaller scale than those indicated by the conventional, larger quadrats.
In view of these problems, the present description of Antarctic vegetation is based on a hierarchical classification, formulated subjectively, with the major units defined by growth form. The two formations (Table 2.1) include vegetation dominated respectively by vascular and nonvascular plants, while subformations are based on growth form of the community dominants.
By
H. Levine, General Foods Corporation, Technical Center T22-1, 555 South Broadway, Tarrytown, New York 10591, USA,
L. Slade, (Present address: Nabisco Brands Inc., Corporate Technology Group, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA)
‘Water is the most ubiquitous plasticizer in our world.’ It has become well established that plasticization by water affects the glass-to-rubber transition temperatures (Tg) of many synthetic and natural amorphous polymers (particularly at low moisture contents), and that Tg depression can be advantageous or disadvantageous to material properties, processing, and stability. Eisenberg has stated that ‘the glass transition is perhaps the most important single parameter which one needs to know before one can decide on the application of the many non-crystalline (synthetic) polymers that are now available.’ Karel has noted that ‘water is the most important… plasticizer for hydrophilic food components.’ The physicochemical effect of water, as a plasticizer, on the Tg of starch and other amorphous or partially-crystalline (PC) polymeric food materials has been increasingly discussed in several recent reviews and reports, dating back to the pioneering doctoral research of van den Berg.
The critical role of water as a plasticizer of amorphous materials (both water-soluble and water-sensitive ones) has been a focal point of our research, and has developed into a central theme during six years of an active industrial program in food polymer science. Recently reported studies from our laboratories were based on thermal and thermomechanical analysis methods used to illustrate and characterize the polymer physico-chemical properties of various food ingredients and products (e.g. starch and rice; gelatin; gluten; frozen aqueous solutions of small sugars, derivatized sugars, polyols, and starch hydrolysis products (SHPs); and ‘intermediate moisture food’ (IMF) carbohydrate systems, all of which were described as systems of amorphous or PC polymers, oligomers, and/or monomers, soluble in and/or plasticized by water.