Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Management
  4. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

46470 results in Management

Page 2268 of 2324

  • BHR volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. b1-b2
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • BHR volume 32 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. f1-f3
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • The Augusta (Georgia) Manufacturing Company in Peace, War, and Reconstruction, 1847–1877

  • Richard W. Griffin
  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. 60-73
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958

  • The potential advantages of the South over New England as a textile manufacturing region were recognized early in the nineteenth century, but it remained to be proved whether the disadvantages were insuperable. The success of a few mills like the Augusta Manufacturing Company provided the necessary precedent and inspiration, and precipitated the migration of an entire industry. The process of recording this episode is in itself of interest, for the pertinent company records have long since disappeared.

  • The Robber Baron Concept In American History

  • Hal Bridges
  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. 1-13
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958

  • The most vehement and persistent controversy in business history has been that waged by the critics and defenders of the “robber baron” concept of the American businessman. Far from being a pedantic exercise, this controversy has at various times exerted a decisive influence on business itself. The origins, spread, and obsolescence of the concept are traced here, together with the merits and failings of currently predominant historical attitudes.

  • Public Accounting in the United States from 1913 to 1928

  • James Don Edwards
  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. 74-101
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958

  • In the years between 1913 and 1928 public accounting evolved from a relatively obscure and limited practice to full maturity as a respected and flourishing profession. The present article deals with these years in some detail, expanding a shorter survey published in the Business History Review in June, 1956. The period from 1928 to 1951 is dealt with in detail in an article in the December, 1956, issue.

  • A Review Article

  • Kenneth E. Boulding, John Kenneth Galbraith
  • Journal:
    Business History Review / Volume 32 / Issue 1 / Spring 1958
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 July 2012, pp. 116-121
    Print publication:
    Spring 1958

  • Historians have awaited with great interest a new endeavor to tell the story of business in America — not in a narrow or technical way, but broadly related to the social environment of which business is one part. Economic historians, business historians, sociologists, and many other specialists have gathered extensive data on phases of business behavior, and are continuing to do so at a commendably prolific rate. The job of synthesis, however, has been neglected, perhaps because of its formidable demands. No two scholars would be likely to agree on the content and emphasis of any volume, such as the one reviewed here, that describes the development of American business. This circumstance does not detract from either the usefulness of the effort or the value of the criticism. The increasingly specialized nature of scholarship demands both the stimulus of a general thesis and wide reactions to that thesis if historical perception is to be kept abreast of accumulating evidence.

Page 2268 of 2324