To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The production of ethical capital, and the capacity of firms and investors to leverage their speculations about which ethical claims will be the most profitable, and which ethical risks are most profitably minimised, depends on information from labour. This chapter reveals some of the ways in which labour, and specifically labour in its role as consumer, informs markets about ethical risks. Branding strategies are co-creative dialogic processes through which consumers and firms produce images, meanings and emotional responses. The acceleration of digital technology supports the expansion and intensification of these processes through which labour co-produces brands, including their ethical dimensions.
This chapter employs a critical reading of the Integrated Reporting framework and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards, methodology and guidance documents. The analysis explores how key concepts like materiality, value, capital, accountability and risk are deployed in these frameworks, to understand the function this form of reporting plays in the speculative moral economy. Guided by historical accounting research and recalling the propositions developed in chapters one and two of the book, this chapter develops an understanding of how ethics are rationalised and made ready for commodification.
This chapter explores the recent consolidation and concentration of the ESG information segment of the financial sector, and the emerging regulation of this sector in the context of political contest over defining the limits of ESG. As the economic significance of ESG investing grows, these debates become more intense and have led to new rules and proposals from securities regulators defining ESG and setting disclosure requirements. These regulatory processes, often positioned as a mechanism to standardise and clarify ESG practices, are exposing the limits of the responsible capital imaginary and creating new platforms to contest the accumulation of ethical capital.
This chapter uses value theory to understand how ethics are produced through contemporary responsible investment practices, and in particular, the integration of ESG issues into investment decisions. The chapter offers an interpretation of value theory that is specific to understanding how ethics are translated into financial decision-making frameworks. This theory is then applied to empirical evidence about ESG integration in practice, to develop the argument that ESG integration produces a derivative logic of ethics, which then has implications for the organisation of capital, labour and nature.
This paper examines workplace bullying in the hospitality sector – an industry paradoxically defined by welcoming others – through a mixed-method approach integrating large-scale quantitative analysis with an in-depth qualitative case study. Study 1 draws on survey data from 2,302 hospitality employees in Aotearoa, New Zealand, to identify the prevalence, patterns, and perpetrators of bullying, and employees’ confidence in employer responses. Over half (56%) reported experiencing or witnessing bullying, with women and supervisors most affected. Study 2 explores a Māori hospitality business guided by manaakitanga (care), whanaungatanga (relationships), and tika (fairness), illustrating how Māori values can counter bullying behaviours. Together, the studies reveal the gap between hospitality’s ideals and workplace realities, proposing Māori-informed approaches as a pathway towards more respectful, inclusive, and restorative organisational environments. The paper contributes to management and hospitality scholarship by demonstrating how Indigenous relational ethics can operationalise organisational care as an antidote to workplace harm.
Drawing together the preceding arguments about the contemporary moral economy, the function of ethics as risk in the context of financialisation and the alienation of ethics from the human being, this chapter highlights the productive nature of ethical capital, but also the political potential it generates.
While digital product innovation offers unprecedented opportunities for incumbent firms to create competitive advantages, its fluid and iterative nature presents distinctive cognitive challenges. There is limited empirical literature explaining the role of constructive cognitive characteristics of executives in differentiating the successful pursuit of digital product innovation. Drawing on upper echelons theory and the attention-based view, we examine how chief executive officer (CEO) cognitive flexibility enables incumbent firms to pursue digital product innovation. Through a mixed-methods approach combining a field survey of 178 machine-building firms and a scenario-based experiment with 134 participants, we demonstrate that CEOs with higher cognitive flexibility achieve superior digital product innovation outcomes by facilitating insightful information acquisition and processing. This relationship is strengthened when CEOs engage in more boundary spanning activities and when firms possess greater social capital. Our study contributes to strategic leadership research by demonstrating how CEO cognitive flexibility enables incumbent firms to navigate the cognitive demands of digital product innovation, while enriching our understanding of how adaptive attention patterns shape strategic adaptation in increasingly digitized environments.
Locating the emergence of ethical capital as a capitalist realist response to overlapping social, ecological and political crises, this chapter sets out the theoretical frame and core concepts of the book. It explains what ethical capital means in the context of this book, why it has emerged alongside a responsible capital imaginary, and what the consequences of this may be.
Chapter one develops a selective survey of different moral economies throughout capitalism’s history, interwoven with a discussion of speculation and risk. This chapter establishes the materialist approach to ethics that the book adopts, anchoring a discussion of the moral economy in key moments of ethical and political struggles. From establishing the liberal philosophical foundations for capitalist accumulation, to the socialisation of capital via joint stock companies, to the monopolistic endeavours of the early twentieth century and the welfare state of the post-World War II era, this history focuses on the dynamic manifestations of moral economy and the politics of speculation, articulating the grounded and contested nature of ethics.
Chapter two, following on from the argument in the previous chapter which uses the moral economy concept as an analytical tool, argues that the contemporary period is characterised by a “speculative moral economy”. This moral economy has two key, contradictory features. First, it is underlaid by the responsible capital imaginary, insisting that it is possible to simultaneously “do well” (make profits) and “do good” (be ethical). Contemporary business ethics asserts that profit-making and social justice are not merely compatible but mutually beneficial. Second, this moral economy is operationalised through risk management, generating a derivative logic of ethics. Ethical questions are treated as risks and are managed, like other risks, through financial mechanisms. Ethics become capital, but at the same time, capital accumulation produces a particular market-compatible ethics.