To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Dunning’s Globalisation (OLI) Model is the best known model of firm globalisation. It extends the cost-advantage perspective to include ownership, locational, and internationalisation advantages as determinants of a multinational corporations’ operation and growth. Using Haier as an exemplary firm, the chapter traces its revival from a non-performing SOE from China to becoming the top brand in home appliances as well as the OLI advantages it can leverage in the unique China context. The chapter also examines the National Development Globalisation Model, a model arising from China’s strong needs for energy and metals to fuel the country’s development and consumption, to address the globalisation of non-manufacturing firms. Using Chalco as an example, the chapter notes that, in spite of the firm’s lack of advantages, its ability to attract unwavering support from the government and its strong leadership to operate in the volatile global environment allow the firm to become the leading aluminium producer.
This chapter discusses several emerging globalisation models: the Springboard Model; its variant, the Leapfrog Model; the Mixed Model, a hybrid globalisation approach that leverages the combined benefits of administrative and market systems; and the Effectual Model, an appropriate for entrepreneurial firms. The discussion delineates the advantages and challenges of each model as well as the motivations for firms to adopt these models. Similar to , this chapter also traces the development of various exemplary firms (and their respective industries) that have successfully adopted these models. They include: China Merchants Bank (Springboard Model), Huawei (Leapfrog Model), CRRC (high-speed rail) (Mixed Model), and Techno (Effectual Model).
This chapter provides an overview of the contents and organisation of the book. It begins by tracing China’s economic reform that took place forty years ago as well as its ensuing economic growth and success that gave rise to modern Chinese firms. As firms such as Lenovo, Alibaba, Citic, and Tencent prosper in this socio-economic environment and gain prominence in the corporate world, researchers are beginning to recognise the contributions of emerging market multinational corporations. The chapter then discusses exemplary Chinese firms as game changers in international business. The chapter ends by outlining the organisation of the book, including the details on the four sections, and its targeted audience.
Twenty-five years after Chinese firms began their globalisation process, some of them have become global game changers and represented in the Fortune Global 500. This chapter begins by discussing the nature, types, and extent of changes these firms have brought about. Then, the chapter points out the growing challenges, including the challenges posed by Chinese firms’ overseas operations and merger and acquisition activities that would affect the perceptions of these firms in the international market. The third part of the chapter takes a futuristic lens and proposes how ‘Chinese firms going global’ will evolve, including a discussion on the extent the world accepts globalising Chinese firms and the impact world acceptance may pose on these firms’ future and growth.
As an economic power, China has become increasingly preoccupied with its image around the world. According to BBC-GlobeScan, China enjoys a neutral to positive national image over the past 12 years, driven by the generally positive perception of the country’s economy. Interestingly, there is a strong divide between perception by developed and developing nations, with the former giving China a much lower rating than the latter. The USA in particular gives a consistently low rating, while sub-Saharan African countries give a consistently high rating. The chapter then reports two ad campaigns carried out by the Chinese government to promote the national image, especially in the USA. Results of public surveys show that, while there is some positive outcome, the public do not like the hard-sell approach. It is suggested that, in the future, national image campaigns should take a softer approach and be carried out by non-governmental organisations or private firms to reduce governmental involvement.
We investigate the causal effect of intangible capital on leverage. To address endogeneity, we exploit patent invalidations by a U.S. court in which judges are randomly assigned to cases. Differences in judge leniency provide exogenous variation in the probability that firms’ patents are invalidated. Using this probability as an instrument for exogenous losses in intangible capital, we find a patent invalidation leads to a 14.1% reduction in leverage, suggesting that intangible capital causally supports leverage. This local average treatment effect is stronger in firms that use patents as loan collateral and in less creditworthy as well as smaller firms.
Excess control rights by inside shareholders have been documented to hurt minority shareholders. This paper shows that such governance feature may benefit creditors. Using a sample of U.S. dual-class firms, I show that these firms take less operational and financial risk than similar single-class firms, consistent with insiders’ emphasis on long-term survival to access ongoing private control benefits. Such risk avoidance translates into lower borrowing costs for dual-class firms. Further, lenders are able to use specific covenants to prevent potential expropriations by insiders. The overall relationship between excess control rights and firm value may be less negative than previously thought.
We show that cross-border leveraged buyout investments involving U.S. rather than non-U.S. private equity (PE) investors are more likely to have a successful exit (initial public offering or acquisition). Exogenous increases in effective proximity following the signing of “open sky agreements” between the United States and target firms’ home countries increases both the propensity of U.S. PE firms to invest in these firms and the value addition by these investors. We show that such increases in value addition by U.S. PE investors following proximity increases are at least partially due to better monitoring, facilitated by the more efficient allocation of experienced U.S. PE managers to cross-border deals.
The responsibility of the food and beverage industry for noncommunicable diseases is a controversial topic. Public health scholars identify the food and beverage industry as one of the main contributors to the rise of these diseases. We argue that aside from moral duties like not doing harm and respecting consumer autonomy, the food industry also has a responsibility for addressing the structural injustices involved in food-related health problems. Drawing on the work of Iris Marion Young, this article first shows how food-related public health problems can be understood as structural injustices. Second, it makes clear how the industry is sustaining these health injustices, and that due to this connection, corporate actors share responsibility for addressing food-related health problems. Finally, three criteria (capacity, benefit, and vulnerability) are discussed as grounds for attributing responsibility, allowing for further specification on what taking responsibility for food-related health problems can entail in corporate practice.
In this chapter, we turn to economic growth, meaning the long-run development of the economy over time. Previously, we have focused on the level of economic activity during a given period of time and on how that level is affected by changes in policies and other factors along with the price level, employment, and unemployment. Now we study how that level moves over long periods of time. Another way of saying this is that we are interested in the trend growth rate of economic activity.