To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter treats pay in nonprofits and the public sector, where the organization’s objectives are not as straightforward as in the typical for-profit firm. It also covers small businesses, a subject which is neglected in standard compensation texts but which is important because some readers are or aspire to be small-business managers. The opening section defines the 3 entities under discussion. Organizational missions and workers’ intrinsic motivation are described, which relates to compensating differentials in that workers who value the organizational mission interpret it as a non-monetary component of pay that creates an incentive to work hard to further the mission. The chapter revisits external and internal constraints on pay, training (and recruitment of desired worker types), performance pay, and turnover, thereby tying the book’s earlier concepts together. Subjects that were covered in earlier chapters are re-examined through the different lenses of nonprofits, the public sector, and small businesses. The chapter ends with coverage of “distance” between managers and owners, which tends to be shorter in small businesses than in larger ones, and its implications for pay.
This paper pursues two questions: what is it in the fiduciary relationship that grounds this transfer of legal power? And, given this grounds, what kind of reason (e.g. practical, moral or otherwise) does the fiduciary then have to act on behalf of the beneficiary? In response to the first, it argues that the principle modes of grounding the transfer of legal power — mutual consent and presumed consent — both involve trust. And in response to the second, it argues that this involvement of trust entails that a fiduciary’s reason for action is ultimately third personal.
As discussed in Chapter 1, running trustworthy controlled experiments is the scientific gold standard in evaluating many (but not all) ideas and making data-informed decisions. What may be less clear is that making controlled experiments easy to run also accelerates innovation by decreasing the cost of trying new ideas, as the quotation from Moran shows above, and learning from them in a virtuous feedback loop. In this chapter, we focus on what it takes to build a robust and trustworthy experiment platform. We start by introducing experimentation maturity models that show the various phases an organization generally goes through when starting to do experiments, and then we dive into the technical details of building an experimentation platform.
We started this book with a glimpse into data and data science. Then we spent the rest of the book, especially Parts II and III, learning various tools and techniques to solve data problems of different kinds. Our approach to all of this has been hands-on. And now we have come full circle. As we wrap up, it is important to take a look at where that data comes from, and how we should broadly think about analyzing it. This final chapter, therefore, is dedicated to those two goals, as you will see in the next two sections. One section is an overview of some of the most common methods for collecting/soliciting data, and the other provides information and ideas about how to approach a data analysis problem with broad methods. Then the final section provides a commentary on evaluation and experimentation.
This chapter responds to the growing importance of business analytics on "big data" in managerial decision-making, by providing a comprehensive primer on analyzing compensation data. All aspects of compensation analytics are covered, starting with data acquisition, types of data, and formulation of a business question that can be informed by data analysis. A detailed, hands-on treatment of data cleaning is provided, equipping readers to prepare data for analysis by detecting and fixing data problems. Descriptive statistics are reviewed, and their utility in data cleaning explicated. Graphical methods are used in examples to detect and trim outliers. The basics of linear regression analysis are covered, with an emphasis on application and interpreting results in the context of the business question(s) posed. One section covers the question of whether or not the pay measure (as a dependent variable) should be transformed via a logarithm, and the implications of that choice for interpreting the results are explained. Precision of regression estimates is covered via an intuitive, non-technical treatment of standard errors. An appendix covers nonlinear relationships among variables.
How and why is nationalization central to the politics of resource-rich countries? This chapter opens with a review of current theories on natural resource wealth and nationalization in political science, economics, and public policy, and then describes why existing theories are unable to answer the questions this book seeks to answer. With these questions in mind, this chapter presents the book’s central theory of why leaders nationalize and how leader survival shapes and is shaped by the choice of nationalization. After describing empirical implications of the argument, the chapter offers initial evidence to support these claims in the form of exploratory case studies of Iran and Iraq. In Iran, the shocking collapse of the Shah in 1979 defied the West’s notion of the “island of stability” in the tumultuous Middle East. In Iraq, the fall of the Hashemite monarchy in 1958 ushered in a decade of instability until the unexpected Ba’athist consolidation in 1968, when Hassan al-Bakr established a 35-year single-party dictatorship. These are precisely the types of outcomes in which the book’s theory predicts nationalization should affect the rise and fall of dictatorships.
The final chapter of the book compares the findings from the four issue areas and links them with the theoretical framework presented in Chapter 2. The chapter then asks: Given the EU’s interventions, what have been the impacts on the functioning of private governance and the larger policy field? The chapter argues that the regulatory impacts are twofold: The interventions have both restructured the field of private governance and largely retained private actors’ governing authority and private governance space. The interventions impose baselines that cannot be undercut and that arguably have resulted in some sustainability improvements. At the same time, the interventions are relatively limited since the standards and procedural regulations are minimum baselines with several evident gaps. This situation allows for policy exports and spillovers from private to public governance, both within the EU and beyond, which can potentially strengthen public policy. The chapter then discusses the generalizability of the theory by discussing examples of public interventions at both the international and the domestic level beyond the EU. The book concludes with avenues for further research.
“Just as trees are the raw material from which paper is produced, so too, can data be viewed as the raw material from which information is obtained.” To present and interpret information, one must start with a process of gathering and sorting data. And for any kind of data analysis, one must first identify the right kinds of information sources.
previous chapter, we discussed different forms of data. The height–weight data we saw was numerical and structured. When you post a picture using your smartphone, that is an example of multimedia data. The datasets mentioned in the section on public policy are government or open data collections.
Why you care:For a company to move to the later phases of experimentation maturity (“Run” or “Fly”), incorporating data analysis pipelines as part of the experimentation platform can ensure that the methodology is solid, consistent, and scientifically founded, and that the implementation is trustworthy. It also helps save teams from needing to do time-consuming ad hoc analysis. If moving in this direction, understanding the common infrastructure steps for data processing, computation, and visualization can be useful.
The chapter explains why the EU has so far failed to intervene in private fisheries governance. The chapter starts with comparing private governance schemes since the 1990s. It then analyses EU policy discussions until late 2017, showing that until very recently all involved stakeholders agreed that the fragmentation of the private governance market needed to be addressed. Differences of opinion on the desirability of publicly supporting product differentiation, however, have continued to exist. While most stakeholders consider the costs such differentiation would impose on European producers too high and therefore support procedural regulation, the European Parliament has consistently favored both standards and procedural regulations in the form of an EU-level certification and eco-labeling scheme. Attempts to create a policy failed in 2008–2009 when a legislative proposal for procedural regulation was abandoned, and in 2013 when the discussion was integrated in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. A 2016 report on feasible policy options, moreover, questioned the fragmentation of the private governance market, casting further doubt on the likelihood of public intervention.
William Anthony Twyman was a UK radio and television audience measurement veteran (MR Web 2014) credited with formulating Twyman’s law, although he apparently never explicitly put it in writing, and multiple variants of it exist, as shown in the above quotations.