To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let d ≥ d0 be a sufficiently large constant. An graph G is a d-regular graph over n vertices whose second-largest (in absolute value) eigenvalue is at most . For any 0<p<1, Gp is the graph induced by retaining each edge of G with probability p. It is known that for the graph Gp almost surely contains a unique giant component (a connected component with linear number vertices). We show that for the giant component of Gp almost surely has an edge expansion of at least .
We show that the sampling formula induced from a Λ-coalescent process with multiple collisions is regenerative if and only if the measure Λ is either concentrated in 0 (Kingman case) or concentrated in 1 (star-shaped case). The Ewens sampling formula is the only sampling formula in this class which also belongs to Pitman's two-parameter family of sampling distributions.
Consider two graphs G1 and G2 on the same vertex set V and suppose that Gi has mi edges. Then there is a bipartition of V into two classes A and B so that, for both i = 1, 2, we have . This gives an approximate answer to a question of Bollobás and Scott. We also prove results about partitions into more than two vertex classes. Our proofs yield polynomial algorithms.
We introduce the minor-closed, dual-closed class of multi-path matroids. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for computing the Tutte polynomial of a multi-path matroid, we describe their basis activities, and we prove some basic structural properties. Key elements of this work are two complementary perspectives we develop for these matroids: on the one hand, multi-path matroids are transversal matroids that have special types of presentations; on the other hand, the bases of multi-path matroids can be viewed as sets of lattice paths in certain planar diagrams.
The partition functions of the Ising and Potts models in statistical mechanics are well known to be partial evaluations of the Tutte–Whitney polynomial of the appropriate graph. The Ashkin–Teller model generalizes the Ising model and the four-state Potts model, and has been extensively studied since its introduction in 1943. However, its partition function (even in the symmetric case) is not a partial evaluation of the Tutte–Whitney polynomial. In this paper, we show that the symmetric Ashkin–Teller partition function can be obtained from a generalized Tutte–Whitney function which is intermediate in a precise sense between the usual Tutte–Whitney polynomialof the graph and that of its dual.
Consider the following communication problem, which leads to a new notion of edge colouring. The communication network is represented by a bipartite multigraph, where the nodes on one side are the transmitters and the nodes on the other side are the receivers. The edges correspond to messages, and every edge e is associated with an integer c(e), corresponding to the time it takes the message to reach its destination. A proper k-edge-colouring with delays is a function f from the edges to {0, 1, . . ., k − 1}, such that, for every two edges e1 and e2 with the same transmitter, f(e1) ≠ f(e2), and for every two edges e1 and e2 with the same receiver, f(e1) + c(e1) ≢ f(e2) + c(e2) (mod k). Ross, Bambos, Kumaran, Saniee and Widjaja [18] conjectured that there always exists a proper edge colouring with delays using k = Δ + o(Δ) colours, where Δ is the maximum degree of the graph. Haxell, Wilfong and Winkler [11] conjectured that a stronger result holds: k = Δ + 1 colours always suffice. We prove the weaker conjecture for simple bipartite graphs, using a probabilistic approach, and further show that the stronger conjectureholds for some multigraphs, applying algebraic tools.
We show that a random 4-regular graph asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s.) has chromatic number 3. The proof uses an efficient algorithm which a.a.s. 3-colours a random 4-regular graph. The analysis includes use of the differential equation method, and exponential bounds on the tail of random variables associated with branching processes. A substantial part of the analysis applies to random d-regular graphs in general.
Let A be a set of N matrices. Let g(A) ≔ |A + A| + |A · A|, where A + A = {a1 + a2 ∣ ai ∈ A} and A · A = {a1a2 ∣ ai ∈ A} are the sum set and product set. We prove that if the determinant of the difference of any two distinct matrices in A is nonzero, then g(A) cannot be bounded below by cN for any constant c. We also prove that if A is a set of d × d symmetric matrices, then there exists ϵ = ϵ(d)>0 such that g(A)>N1+ϵ. For the first result, we use the bound on the number of factorizations in a generalized progression. For the symmetric case, we use a technical proposition which provides an affine space V containing a large subset E of A, with the property that if an algebraic property holds for a large subset of E, then it holds for V. Then we show that the system a2 : a ∈ V is commutative, allowing us to decompose as eigenspaces simultaneously, so we can finish the proof with induction and a variant of the Erdős–Szemerédi argument.
We describe how non-crossing partitions arise in substitution method calculations. By using efficient algorithms for computing non-crossing partitions we are able to substantially reduce the computational effort, which enables us to compute improved bounds on the percolation thresholds for three percolation models. For the Kagomé bond model we improve bounds from 0.5182 ≤ pc ≤ 0.5335 to 0.522197 ≤ pc ≤ 0.526873, improving the range from 0.0153 to 0.004676. For the (3, 122) bond model we improve bounds from 0.7393 ≤ pc ≤ 0.7418 to 0.739773 ≤ pc ≤ 0.741125, improving the range from 0.0025 to 0.001352. We also improve the upper bound for the hexagonal site model, from 0.794717 to 0.743359.
We show that every regular tournament on n vertices has at least n!/(2 + o(1))n Hamiltonian cycles, thus answering a question of Thomassen [17] and providing a partial answer to a question of Friedgut and Kahn [7]. This compares to an upper bound of about O(n0.25n!/2n) for arbitrary tournaments due to Friedgut and Kahn (somewhat improving Alon's bound of O(n0.5n!/2n)). A key ingredient of the proof is a martingale analysis of self-avoiding walks on a regular tournament.
The strong isometric dimension of a graph G is the least number k such that G isometrically embeds into the strong product of k paths. Using Sperner's theorem, the strong isometric dimension of the Hamming graphs K2 □ Kn is determined.
We study a dynamically evolving random graph which adds vertices and edges using preferential attachment and is ‘attacked by an adversary’. At time t, we add a new vertex xt and m random edges incident with xt, where m is constant. The neighbours of xt are chosen with probability proportional to degree. After adding the edges, the adversary is allowed to delete vertices. The only constraint on the adversarial deletions is that the total number of vertices deleted by time n must be no larger than δn, where δ is a constant. We show that if δ is sufficiently small and m is sufficiently large then with high probability at time n the generated graph has a component of size at least n/30.
In this chapter, after a brief review of the basics of differential and Riemannian geometry, we shall discuss some of the fundamental concepts of noncommutative geometry. After that, we shall illustrate with examples how quantum dynamical semigroups arise naturally in the context of classical and noncommutative geometry, and how they carry important information about the underlying classical or noncommutative geometric spaces. These semigroups are essentially the ‘heat semigroups’ with unbounded generator given by the Laplacian (or some variant of it) on the underlying space; and in the classical case, the dilation of such semigroups naturally involve a suitable Brownian motion on the manifold. While the classical theory of heat semigroup and Brownian motion on a manifold is well established and quite rich, there is not yet any general theory of their counterparts in noncommutative geometry. Neither the theory of quantum stochastic calculus nor noncommutative geometry are at a stage for developing a general theory connecting the two. Instead of a general theory, the present state of both subjects calls for an understanding of various examples available, and this is what we try to do in this chapter. We do so at two levels: first, at the semigroup level, and then at the level of quantum stochastic processes coming from dilation of the semigroups.
Basics of differential and Riemannian geometry
We presume that the reader is familiar with the basic concepts of differential geometry, including tangent, cotangent, differential forms etc. and at least the definition and elementary properties of Lie groups. Let us very briefly review the concepts of connection, curvature and also of Riemannian geometry.
In Chapter 6 we built a theory of quantum stochastic dilation ‘naturally’ associated with an arbitrary Q.D.S. on a von Neumann or C*-algebra with bounded generator. There the computations involved C* or von Neumann Hilbert modules, using the results of [24], map-valued quantum stochastic processes on modules and quantum stochastic integration with respect to them, developed in Chapter 5. It is now natural to consider the case of a Q.D.S. with unbounded generator and ask the same questions about the possibility of dilation. As one would expect, the problem is too intractable in this generality and we need to impose some further structures on it. In this chapter we shall consider a few classes of such Q.D.S. and try to construct H–P and E–H dilation for them. At first, we shall work under the framework of a Lie group action on the underlying algebra, and consider covariant Q.D.S. For H–P dilation, symmetry with respect to a trace is also assumed, whereas a general theory for E–H dilation has been built under the assumption of covariance under the action of a compact group, but without it being symmetric. Then, in the last section, we deal with a class of Q.D.S. on the U.H.F. algebra, described in Chapter 3. In this case, E–H dilation is constructed by a direct iteration using some natural estimates. However, what is common to the methods used in constructing dilation for the different kinds of Q.D.S. mentioned above is the use of a natural locally convex topology, in which the generator (unbounded in the norm topology) is continuous.
The motivations for writing the present monograph are three-fold: firstly from a physical point of view and secondly from two related, but different mathematical angles.
At the present time our mathematical understanding of a conservative quantum mechanical system is reasonably complete, both from the direction of a consistent abstract theory as well as from the one of mathematical theories of applications in many explicit physical systems like atoms, molecules etc. (see for example the books [12] and [108]). However, a nonconservative (open/dissipative) quantum mechanical system does not enjoy a similar status. Over the last seven decades there have been many attempts to make a theory of open quantum systems beginning with Pauli [104]. Some of the typical references are: Van Hove [126], Ford et al. [52], along with the mathematical monograph of Davies [35]. The physicists' Master equation (or Langevin equation) was believed to describe the evolution of a nonconservative open quantum (or classical) mechanical system, a mathematical description of which can be found in Feller's book [50].
Physically, one can conceive of an open system as the ‘smaller subsystem’ of a total ensemble in which the system is in interaction with its ‘larger’ environment (sometimes called the bath or reservoir). The total ensemble with a very large number of degrees of freedom undergoes (conservative) evolution, obeying the laws of standard quantum mechanics. However, for various reasons, practical or otherwise, it is of interest only to observe the system and not the reservoir, and this ‘reduced dynamics’ in a certain sense obeys the Master equation (for a more precise description of these, see [35]).
Let us now restrict ourselves to the case when the general locally convex space X is replaced by a C* or a von Neumann algebra A, and study the implications of the complete positivity of a semigroup Tt acting on it.
Definition 3.0.1 A quantum dynamical semigroup (Q.D.S) on a C*-algebra A is a contractive semigroup Tt of class C0 such that each Tt is a completely positive map from A to itself. Tt is said to be conservative if Tt (1) = 1 for all t ≥ 0.
Generators of uniformly continuous quantum dynamical semigroups: the theorems of Lindblad and Christensen–Evans
For a uniformly continuous semigroup on a von Neumann algebra A ⊆ B(h), we have the following result.
Lemma 3.1.1Let Tt = etL be a uniformly continuous contractive semigroup acting on A with L as the generator. Then Tt is normal for each t if and only if L is ultra-strongly (and hence ultra-weakly) continuous on any norm-bounded subset of A.
Proof:
Let us first note that L is norm-bounded. If L is ultra-strongly continuous on bounded sets, then clearly etL is ultra-strongly continuous on bounded sets for each t, and hence normal. For the converse, first note that for any t ≥ 0 and x ∈ A, we have
Hence it is not difficult to see that
Now suppose that xα is a net of elements in A such that xα strongly converges to x ∈ A and there exists positive constant M such that ∥xα∥ ≤ M for all α. Fix u ∈ h and ∈ > 0. Choose t0 small enough so that ∥L∥2M∥u∥t0 ≤ ∈.