To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Work–energy concepts are important for two reasons. First, they provide an alternative way to guarantee equilibrium and compatibility, which are two key elements in all stress analyses. Second, energy methods have become the basis of formulating numerical methods so they are at the heart of the field of computational mechanics, which will be discussed in the next chapter.In this chapter we will discuss two types of internal energy in deformable bodies – strain energy and complementary strain energy. Although we will show that these internal energies are equal for linear elastic bodies, we will see that they play distinct roles in terms of work–energy relations. A number of important general principles and theorems will be described including the principle of virtual work, the principle of complementary virtual work, the principle of minimum potential energy, the theorem of minimum complementary potential energy, and the reciprocity theorem.The classical theorems of Castigliano and Engesser and the principle of least work will be used to solve problems with discrete forces and moments.
Structures can fail in different ways so that one needs to examine a variety of failure modes. In this chapter we will consider (1) a number of the commonly used static failure theories, (2) fatigue failure under alternating loads, and (3) fracture theory. We will also briefly discuss how nondestructive inspections can be used in conjunction with crack growth laws to keep structures safe while in use. Another way that structures can fail is through a loss of stability. The sudden buckling of columns, also called a bifurcation type of instability, will be described as well as other types of instabilities such as limit-load instabilities and snap-through buckling instabilities.
The distribution of the external forces acting on a body affects both the internal and external deformation of the body. The internal deformations in particular depend on how the forces are distributed throughout the body. Stress is a key concept that gives us a way to characterize those internal force distributions. This chapter will discuss in depth the stress concept, including stress transformations, principal stresses, states of stress, and Mohr's circle. MATLAB® will be used as the principal tool for calculations.
The previous chapter focused on the behavior of the stress vector and stresses at any fixed point in a body. However, stresses will also vary from point to point within a deformable body so that we need to describe those spatial variations. As we will see in this chapter, local equations of equilibrium involving the stresses must be satisfied everywhere within a body. We will examine if the elementary theories of axial loads, bending, and torsion considered in Chapter 1 satisfy these equations of equilibrium and relate these equilibrium equations for the stresses to the force and moment equilibrium equations normally used in elementary strength of materialsdiscussions.
Previous chapters examined the topics of equilibrium, compatibility, strain–displacement relations, and stress–strain relations. When these elements are combined, we can form up different complete sets of governing differential and algebraic equations. In order to solve those sets of equations we must also specify the conditions that arise from having known loads or geometric constraints. These are called the boundary conditions for the problem.In this chapter we will examine some of the choices we have for formulating complete sets of the governing equations and how those governing equations can be combined with appropriate boundary conditions to solve for the stresses and deformations. We will also discuss the principle of Saint-Venant, which gives us some flexibility in how we specify the boundary conditions. Finally, we will also show how structural analysis problems can be expressed in terms of algebraic matrix–vector equations, which are the counterparts of the governing differential/algebraic equations. A classical deformable body problem, Navier's table problem, will be used as an example of these purely algebraic methods.
The engineering beam bending theory summarized in Chapter 1 assumed that the beam cross-sectional area has a plane of symmetry and that bending moments were acting along a single axis. In this chapter we want to remove those restrictions and to examine the multiaxis bending of beams with nonsymmetrical cross-sections. This will lead to a generalization of the flexure formula for the normal stress in the beam.In Chapter 1 we also obtained an expression for the shear stresses induced in symmetrical beams. It is difficult to obtain similar analytical shear-stress forms for beams with general unsymmetrical cross-sections. However, we will show that when the cross-section is thin one can obtain explicit expressions for the shear stresses. Analysis of the bending of thin beams will demonstrate that the shear force in the beam must pass through a specific point, called the shear center, if the beam is to bend without twisting. A new cross-sectional area property, called the principal sectorial area function, will be shown to play a key role in locating the shear center.
Most complex deformable body problems commonly found in practice can only be solved with numerical methods. The stiffness-based finite element method is today the numerical method of choice for analyzing deformable bodies as well as many other engineering problems. In this chapter we will describe both stiffness-based and force-based finite elements. It will be shown that while the stiffness-based finite element method is based on solving equilibrium equations for the displacements, the force-based method relies on appropriately combining equilibrium and compatibility to solve directly for the forces (or stresses). We will examine both stiffness-based and force-based finite elements for axial load and bending problems. Simple examples will be used that allow us to work through the application of these finite element methods in detail and to compare results with analytical solutions. Finally, we will outline an important alternative to a finite element approach - the boundary element method – for solving stress problems numerically.
Stresses describe the local distributions of forces within a deformable body and strains describe the local deformations. In this chapter we want to describe the relations between stresses and strains as these are the key relationships that allow us to connect the loads applied to a body to its changes in shape. We will only consider linear elastic materials in this book where the stresses are proportional to the small strains present. Both isotropic and anisotropic linear elastic materials will be discussed. How the elastic constants appearing in the general stress–strain relations for an anisotropic material change with choice of orientation of the coordinate system being used will be given explicitly. The use of strain gages and stress–strain relations to determine the state of stress on the surface of a body will be discussed.
The torsion of a solid or hollow bar with a circular cross-section is one of the important problems considered in elementary strength of material texts. In this chapter we consider the torsion of bars having more general cross-sections, where the axial warping deformations produced requires that one develop a much more complex solution procedure. We will first consider the idealized case of uniform torsion where the bar is completely free to warp. Solutions of uniform torsion problems are obtained using both a warping function and a Prandtl stress function approach. The case of nonuniform torsion, where the rate of twist varies along the length of the bar and the warping of the bar is restrained, is also considered using a warping function approach. Uniform and nonuniform torsion problems for general cross-sections typically require a numerical solution. However, in the case of thin members, one can obtain more direct solutions for both open and closed cross-sections. It will be shown that the sectorial area function plays a major role in the solution of both uniform and nonuniform torsion problems for thin cross-sections.
The chapter begins by defining mixing and then discusses how ocean mixing is studied by a combination of direct observations, process studies, and studies integrated with modeling. The role of mixing in the meridional overturning circulation is examined in detail, including current suggestions termed ‘upside-down’ mixing. The chapter concludes with energy and scalar budgets that determine average mixing levels throughout the ocean.
This chapter discusses the interactions generating and dissipating internal waves, the primary mechanism mixing the stratified ocean. Generation is primarily by wind stress at the surface, bottom stress at the seafloor, and tidal flows over irregular bottoms. Energy is transferred from large to small scales by resonant interactions, primary triads, that lead to ultimate breaking and mixing. Testing of expressions for predicting dissipation rates resulting from wave–wave interactions is examined in detail. The mechanisms of breaking affect the efficiency of mixing and therefore the buoyancy fluxes it produces. Shear instabilities and advective overturning are the two primary mechanisms, but the form of instability remains open to question. Finally, the saturated range separating linear internal waves from turbulence is examined.