To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter introduces Anderson and Belnap’s natural deduction treatment of entailment and the idea that hypotheses in deductions should really be used in those deductions. The idea of real use motivates relevant logic and is a key idea in the chapters that follow. The chapter outlines the development of Fitch-style natural deduction systems and introduces the reader to them.
This chapter derives asymptotics determined by a critical point where the singular variety is locally smooth: the generic situation which arises most commonly in practice. Several explicit formulae for asymptotics are given.
This chapter concludes the book. It contains a survey of the state of analytic combinatorics in several variables, including problems on the boundary of our current knowledge.
The semantical framework for the positive view of this book is one in which entailment is understood primarily in terms of theory closure. This chapter outlines both the history of the notion, beginning with Alfred Tarski’s theory of closure operators, and the relationship between closure operators and the entailment connective. At the end of the chapter, it is shown how closure operators can be used to model a simple logic, Graham Priest’s logic N4.
From 1912, C. I. Lewis attempted to construct a logic of entailment. In doing so, he created his modal logics, S1–S5, of which his chosen logic of entailment was S2. Although his logics avoid the so-called paradoxes of material implication, they still fall prey to the problem of explosion (that every proposition follows from any contradiction) and the problem of implosion (that every tautology follows from every proposition). These problems, and the inadequate treatment of nested entailments, make Lewis’s logics of limited use as logics of entailment. The chapter also discusses the systems devised by Lewis’s students Everett Nelson and William Parry. Nelson’s connexive logic avoids many of the problems with Lewis’s system but is found to have severe difficulties of its own, and Parry’s analytic implication, although it introduces an interesting version of the notion of meaning containment, does not adequately avoid the problems with Lewis’s logics.
This chapter generalizes the ideas given in the previous chapter. It sets out the notion of a model based on a set of theories. One of these theories is the logic itself. It is, so to speak, the correct theory of theories. It correctly states the principles under which all the theories (including itself) are closed. But each theory has associated with it a closure operator. Some of these operators get the principles of theory closure quite wrong in the sense that they do not apply correctly to every theory in the model. The interaction between these closure operators can be altered in various ways, giving rise to different logical systems. The resulting formal semantics can be represented in the manner of Kit Fine’s “Models for Entailment”.
The idea of using the generalised inverse of a singular matrix A to solve the matrix equation Ax = b has been discussed in the earlier papers [1, 2, 3, 4] in the Gazette. Here we discuss three simple geometric questions which are of interest in their own right, and which illustrate the use of the generalised inverse of a matrix. The three questions are about polygons and circles in the Euclidean plane. We need not assume that a polygon is a simple closed curve, nor that it is convex: indeed, abstractly, a polygon is just a finite sequence (v1, …, vn) of its distinct, consecutive, vertices. It is convenient to let vn + 1 = v1 and (later) Cn + 1 = C1.
This chapter contains a variety of examples deriving asymptotics of generating functions taken from the research literature, illustrating the power of analytic combinatorics in several variables.
This appendix presents a collection of key results on Morse theory, intersection classes, and the computation of Leray residue forms, specialized to the most important local geometries treated in the book.
The tangential strain rate in premixed flames impacts significantly the flame surface area generation and thus the combustion process. Studies on incompressible isotropic turbulence have revealed that the mean tangential strain rate at material and iso-scalar surfaces is positive and exhibits a universal value when normalized by the Kolmogorov time. This is associated with the preferential alignment of the surface normal with the most compressive principal strain rate. The present study investigates such effects in premixed hydrogen and iso-octane flame kernels using direct numerical simulations. It is shown that the normalized mean tangential strain rate of the investigated flames has a very similar value compared with the incompressible flows. However, in the reaction zone, the flame surface normal aligns preferentially with the most extensive principal strain rate. Furthermore, this alignment depends on the reaction progress variable and the Lewis number, while the tangential strain rate remains independent of these parameters. Such counter-intuitive behaviour is systematically investigated by decomposing the effects of dilatation and residual solenoidal turbulence. It is found that the solenoidal turbulence influences significantly the tangential strain rate. A general effect of turbulence on the tangential strain rate is identified, which is consistent with incompressible flows and independent of the Lewis number and the reaction progress variable. This is a remarkable finding indicating that models of the tangential strain rate developed based on incompressible flows apply also to premixed flames with different Lewis numbers, and, for the modelling, only the solenoidal turbulence should be considered.