To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Observations of the large scale magnetic field in the photosphere taken at the Wilcox Solar Observatory since 1976 up to 2005 have been analyzed to deduce its latitudinal and longitudinal structures, its differential rotation, and their variability in time. Basic topology of solar magnetic field was reconstructed in coordinate system rotating with different rate.
Employing the Poincaré index of isolated null-point in a vector field, we work out a mathematical method of searching 3D null-points in coronal magnetic fields. After introducing the theory of differential topology, we test the method by using the analytical model of Brown & Priest. The location of null-point identified by our method coincides precisely with the analytical solution. Finally we apply the method to search 3D null-points in coronal magnetic fields reconstructed based on observed magnetograms of two active regions (NOAA AR 10488 and AR 10720). We find that the 3D null-points seem to be a key element to the magnetic topology associated with flare occurrence.
We report the eruption of a small filament on 2001 September 28. Followed by a two-ribbon flare, the eruption was associated with a partial halo coronal mass ejection. During the eruption, coronal bipolar double dimmings were formed on the regions of opposite magnetic polarities. The optical counterparts of the coronal dimmings, i.e., the $H_{\alpha}$ dimmings, were clear and showed similar appearance and consistent development. A remarkable fact is that the two dimmings were preceded by impulsive EUV and $H_{\alpha}$ brightenings at the flare's rise phase, suggesting that the eruption can be explained by the tether-cutting model.
From Yohkoh and SoHO observations, the magnetic reconnection is considered as a main energy release mechanism of the solar active phenomena. In this study, we try to reproduce GOES X-ray light curves (1–8 $\AA$) of solar flares using a model incorporating the radiative and conductive cooling and the magnetic reconnection heating.
The Prototype Brazilian Decimetre Array (PBDA) consists of 5 element alt-azimuth mounted parabolic dishes of 4-m diameter, having baselines up to 216 m in East-West direction. We present initial solar observations carried out with the PBDA during the period 22$^{\hbox{\scriptsize{nd}}}$ November to 11$^{\hbox{\scriptsize{th}}}$ December, 2004. The frequency of observation was 1.6 GHz. The temporal and spatial resolution were 100 ms and 3 arcmin, respectively.
The propagation of surface and body linear MHD modes in a twisted magnetic flux tube embedded in a magnetically twisted plasma environment is considered. The dispersion relation for surface and body modes is derived assuming constant external twisted field. Analytic approximate solutions to the dispersion equation are found for the long and short wave length cases.
It was found, that in case the twisted component of the magnetic field in the environment of the flux tube is constant the index of Bessel functions $\nu$ in the corresponding dispersion relation is not integer. In the particular case of a homogen magnetic twist the total pressure is found to be constant across the boundary of the flux tube.
We use the spectral shapes of the EUV line profiles to study the plasma dynamics, acceleration and heating, in polar plumes (PP). We find that the observed profiles are reproduced fairly well when considering low plume wind speeds and velocity turbulence $(\alpha_S)$ at low altitudes followed by a rapid acceleration and heating of the plasma to reach the properties of inter-plumes (IP) by $\approx3-4~R_\odot$. We also find that plumes very close to the pole give narrow profiles at all heights that are not observed above $\approx2.5~R_\odot$. This suggests a tendency for plume footpoints to lie more than 10° away from the pole. High resolution magnetograms of SOLIS and EUV images support this hypothesis.
Longitudinal structure of the photospheric magnetic field over last tree solar cycles has been studied. The reconstruction of the longitudinal structure in the heliographic system rotating rigidly with Carrington rate was performed and compared with longitudinal distributions of random origin.
The Statistics analyses of the microwave type III bursts, coronal mass ejections (CMEs), H$\alpha$flares and relevant events observed with 5200–7600 MHz spectrograph at the Chinese National Astronomical Observatory during the 23rd solar cycle are carried out in this article. Some significant results are obtained from the relevant events. The radiation mechanism of that is also discussed from the observation characteristics.
We analyze the periodicities for 294 solar flares observed by Nobeyama Radioheliograph over 6 discrete frequencies of 1, 2, 3.75, 9.4, 17 and 35 GHz during the solar cycle 23 between 1998 and 2004. Using Fourier analysis, we pick up the shortest period ($T_{\rm{s}}$) for each event at each frequency channel. We find that $T_{\rm{s}}$ varies in the range of 0.25–0.62 s over 6 frequency channels.
Using the data from BBSO, YNAO and SOHO/MDI we studied the formation and evolution of a ring-filament which was located in NOAA AR09470 from May 21 to 24, 2001. We found that: (1) the ring-filament's formation was well associated with newly-emerging flux. (2) all the eruptions of the filament happened during the decay of the emerging bipoles.
The Kislovodsk series of the green (FeXIV 530.3 nm; KI$_{5303}$) and red (FeX 637.4 nm; KI$_{6374}$) corona has been used to calculate the mean monthly intensities at high latitude (45$^\circ$–90$^\circ$) zones for 1957–2002. The ratio KI$_{6374}$/KI$_{5303}$ was observed during the minimum sunspot activity. It was shown that this ratio increased by more than a factor 2 during the last 45 years at the high latitudes (45$^\circ$–90$^\circ$). This may be interpreted that the fraction of cool regions in the polar corona has more than doubled over these years. We suggest that this increase in the amount of cool regions is related to the increase in the area of the polar zones occupied by magnetic field of a single polarity at the solar minimum and possibly to a corresponding increase in the area occupied by polar coronal holes, while the magnetic field strength itself has not or barely increased.
The broad range of dynamics exhibited by plasma motions within the solar interior affects many aspects of the generation and transport of magnetic fields during the solar magnetic activity cycle. On the photosphere, such dynamics include the differential rotation, meridional flows, and a hierarchy of convection cells, and these fluid motions are observed to readily advect any small-scale magnetic fields embedded within them. While the effects of large-scale flows on the global activity cycle are well known, it is becoming increasingly apparent that small-scale dynamics can also affect global magnetic activity throughout the solar cycle. Such effects include variations in the strength of the magnetic dipole moment with time, and the timing of the reversals of the polar-cap flux. In this article, several aspects of this coupling between small and large scales will be illustrated, and the implications of such coupling on the solar activity cycle will be discussed.
Depending on one’s point of view, the realization that solutions to even simple deterministic dynamical systems could produce highly irregular – chaotic – behavior happened 40 years ago with the publication of Edward Lorenz’ seminal paper “Deterministic nonperiodic flow” or probably more than 100 years ago with Poincaré’s study of complicated orbits in three-body problems of classical Hamiltonian mechanics. Each study indicated the prevalence of complex orbits in classical state space when only a few degrees of freedom were involved. Each study was an unpleasant surprise to physical scientists, and Poincaré’s work was roundly ignored for more than half a century, while Lorenz’ results were reported in a geosciences journal read by a relatively small group of atmospheric scientists.
Each result, one on the celestial mechanics of Hamiltonian systems and the other on a severe approximation to the dissipative fluid dynamics of convection, had no place in the mainstream pursuits of the day. This was in remarkable contrast to the development of the wave equation for nonrelativistic quantum theory, or the crystal structure of DNA. Both of these were at the core of widely identified important problems and were developments for which a huge body of scientists was prepared. Scientists were not even looking in the right direction when chaotic behavior in deterministic systems was found.
It is no coincidence that it was at CERN, the particle-physics accelerator laboratory in Geneva, that Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. Given the distributed nature of the multi-institute collaborations required for modern particle-physics experiments, the particle-physics community desperately needed a tool for exchanging information. After a slow start, their community enthusiastically adopted the Web for information exchange within their experimental collaborations – the first Web site in the USA was at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Since its beginnings in the early 1990s, the Web has taken by storm not only the entire scientific world but also the worlds of business and recreation. Now, just a decade later, scientists need to develop capabilities for collaboration that go far beyond those of the Web. Besides being able to access information from different sites they want to be able to use remote computing resources, to integrate, federate, and analyze information from many disparate and distributed data resources, and to access and control remote experimental equipment. The ability to access, move, manipulate, and mine data is the central requirement of these new collaborative-science applications – be they data held in a file or database repositories, data generated by accelerators or telescopes, or data gathered from mobile sensor networks.
At the end of the 1990s, John Taylor became Director General of Research Councils at the Office of Science and Technology (OST) in the UK – roughly equivalent to Director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in the USA. Before his appointment to the OST, Taylor had been Director of HP Laboratories in Europe and HP as a company have long had a vision of computing and IT resources as a “utility.” Rather than purchase expensive IT infrastructure outright, users in the future would be able to pay for IT services as they require them, in the same way as we use the conventional utilities such as electricity, gas, and water. In putting together a bid to government for an increase in science funding, Taylor realized that many areas of science could benefit from a common IT infrastructure to support multidisciplinary and distributed collaborations. He therefore articulated a vision for this type of collaborative science and introduced the term “e-Science”:
e-Science is about global collaboration in key areas of science, and the next generation of infrastructure that will enable it.
The great discoveries in physics and the technological breakthroughs in the twentieth century have completely revolutionized astronomy – the observational study of the physical Universe beyond Earth and its theoretical understanding. These great discoveries included special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics, atomic structure, and nuclear structure, together with the elementary particles and their unified interactions. The technological developments of the twentieth century which had the greatest impact on observational astronomy included microelectronics, microdetectors, computers, and space-age technologies. They allowed astronomical observations deep into space with unprecedented resolution and sensitivity. The New Physics, together with these observations, led by the end of the twentieth century to an amazing understanding of an extremely complex Universe that contains more than 1021 stars in more than 100 billion galaxies with enormous variety, diverse environments, and complex evolutions. Nevertheless, astronomy, one of the oldest sciences, is still one of the most rapidly developing. This is because many fundamental questions related to the origin of our physical Universe, to its contents, to its laws, and to the existence of life in it are still unanswered. They may be answered as science progresses, new technologies for high-resolution observations are exploited, and new fundamental theories are developed and tested. In this chapter, we give a brief account of our present knowledge of the physical Universe, our current understanding of it, and our major observational endeavors to widen this knowledge and understanding.
Advances in observational astronomy
Until the invention of the optical telescope for military purposes at the beginning of the seventeenth century, astronomical observations were made with the naked eye. The Universe observable from planet Earth included only five other planets – Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn – orbiting the Sun and a few thousand more distant stars. The invention of the telescope dramatically increased the horizon of the observable Universe, the number of observable stars, and the resolving power of observations.
Physics is the science of matter – the stuff of the Universe around us, and of energy – the capacity of matter to act in different ways. Physics is the systematic study of how this matter and energy behave, the explanation of what this reveals, and the understanding it brings. A magnificent allegory of what a physicist does can be found in the Old Testament, the Book of Job, Chapter 28.
For he looketh to the ends of the earth, and seeth under the whole heaven; To make the weight for the winds; and he weigheth the waters by measure. When he sought a decree for the rain, and a way for the lightning and the thunder. Then he did see it and declare it . . .
If our surroundings are seen as being built up of matter, much of Nature is ultimately physics, so physics underpins many other branches of science. It is difficult to be more ambitious than that. But as though such boldness were not enough of a challenge, new physics has gone on to reveal that matter and energy can exist in forms and behave in ways very different from those we know in everyday life. The goal becomes even more ambitious. Nature, and therefore physics, has become much wider than what we normally see around us.