To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are closely related phenomena (see Section 5.3.5), and it now seems very likely that they are simply different manifestations of a single, underlying physical process, namely, the release of magnetic energy stored in the magnetic field of the solar atmosphere. In the past there has been considerable controversy about the relation between CMEs and flares. Some authors have argued that flares cause CMEs by creating high enough temperatures to eject both plasma and magnetic field into the interplanetary medium. However, most CMEs are not associated with what is normally considered a flare (Gosling, 1993), and even in those cases that are, the thermal pressure is never enough to force the field open (Low, 2001).
As discussed in the previous chapter, flares occur over a span of energy scales that ranges from very small (microflares at the observable limit) to very large (>1032 ergs). Some time ago, Švestka and Cliver (1992) suggested that the main factor that determines whether a CME will be associated with a flare or not, is the strength of the magnetic field in the erupting region. If the ambient magnetic field strength is weak, then the emitted radiation, although still present, is just too faint to be considered a flare according to the traditional definition (Zirin 1988). According to some models, it is possible to have two CMEs with nearly the same trajectories and speeds but with an order of magnitude or more difference in the peak intensities of their light curves (Reeves and Forbes, 2005).
Space physics started over 50 years ago with the launches on October 4 and November 3, 1957, of Sputnik I and II by the Soviet Union, and Explorer 1 and 3 by the United States on January 31 and March 26, 1958. Explorers 1 and 3 carried James Van Allen's Geiger counters. He had hoped to measure the lowenergy portion of the differential intensity of cosmic rays (particles with energies of hundreds of MeV of non-terrestrial origin), which could not be observed from the ground or with balloons because of atmospheric absorption. Yet the few minutes of data, received whenever the satellite was within range of the tracking station, were puzzling. At low geocentric distances of the 2500 km apogee orbit of Explorer 1 particle intensities were as expected. However, at higher altitudes the intensity dropped to zero. Explorer 3 carried a tape recorder and solved the puzzle. Again, the particle intensity or counting rate was normal at low altitudes, but then it increased rapidly until the maximum transmittable level of 128 counts/s was reached. A constant rate of 128 counts/s was observed for some time but then suddenly dropped to zero, recovering to 128 counts/s later and finally returning to normal at low altitudes. The actual counting rate was increasing rapidly far beyond the 128 counts/s limit, reaching such high rates that the Geiger counter “froze”, that is discharged so frequently that it could not properly recover between counts, yielding pulses too small to be detected by the circuitry used.
Heliophysics is concerned with laws that give rise to structures and processes that occur in magnetized plasmas and in neutral environments in the local cosmos, both temporal (weather-like) and persistent (climate-like). These laws systematize the results of half a century of exploring space that followed centuries of ground-based observations. During this time spacecraft have imaged the Sun over many wavelengths and resolutions. They have visited every planet, all major satellites and many minor ones, and a selection of comets and asteroids. Beyond this they have traversed the expanse of the heliosphere itself. Out of the vast store of data so accumulated, the laws and principles of heliophysics are emerging to describe structures that are natural to magnetized plasmas and neutrals in cosmic settings and to specify principles that make the heliosphere a realm of numerous, original dynamical modes.
By “the laws of heliophysics” we are not here referring to a subset of the laws of physics that apply to all things everywhere. A discipline that needs to refer back to the fundamental laws of physics to explain its phenomena would be totally derivative, having no synthesizing laws of its own, no regularities peculiar to it, no inherent principles with explanatory power sufficient to link its own distinctive phenomena; in short, no paradigms. To help fix this idea, we list here a few familiar examples from other fields of discipline-specific general laws or principles: chemistry – the periodic table, valence, Le Chatelier–Braun principle; biology – evolution, double helix; geology – “deep time”, plate tectonics; astronomy – Kepler's laws, Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, expanding universe; meteorology – Hadley cell, baroclinic instability.
The tenuous, partially ionized plasma in planetary upper atmospheres is vulnerable to explosive and dynamic events from both the Sun and the lower atmosphere. The power of the Sun is continuously bombarding the atmospheres of planets with photons, energetic particles, and plasma. Some of the most dramatic solar events are the sudden release of electromagnetic energy during solar flares, and plasma from interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICME). The intense solar radiation from a flare is the first to impact a planetary system, shortly followed by the arrival of relativistic energetic particles. Some time later, hours to days depending on the planet's distance from the Sun, the bulk of the plasma arrives to interact with, in some cases, the planetary magnetosphere; energy is then channeled into the upper atmospheres and ionospheres. The upper atmospheres are subjected to dramatic changes in external forcing by these types of events, by as much as a factor of two in total energy deposited, by an order of magnitude for individual processes, and by several orders of magnitude in some wavelength bands.
The upper atmospheres of planets are also being pushed and jostled by energy and momentum propagating upward from the dynamic chaotic lower atmospheres. The total solar irradiance driving the lower atmospheres is invariant except for the fraction of one percent changes observed over a solar cycle. Estimates have been made of the impact of longer-term changes in solar radiative output on Earth's climate, an area that is explored further in Vol. III.
Thoroughly revised and updated, this textbook provides a pedagogical introduction to relativity. It is self-contained, but the reader is expected to have a basic knowledge of theoretical mechanics and electrodynamics. It covers the most important features of both special and general relativity, as well as touching on more difficult topics, such as the field of charged pole-dipole particles, the Petrov classification, groups of motions, gravitational lenses, exact solutions and the structure of infinity. The necessary mathematical tools (tensor calculus, Riemannian geometry) are provided, most of the derivations are given in full, and exercises are included where appropriate. Written as a textbook for undergraduate and introductory graduate courses, it will also be of use to researchers working in the field. The bibliography gives the original papers and directs the reader to useful monographs and review papers.
Current research on the origin and evolution of active galaxies is comprehensively surveyed in this collaborative volume. Both of the proposed types of central activity - active galactic nuclei and starbursts - are analysed with a particular emphasis on their relationship to the large-scale properties of the host galaxy. The crucial question is what triggers and fuels nuclear activity now and at earlier epochs? The topics covered here are gas flows near to massive black holes, the circumnuclear galactic regions, and the large-scale bars in disk galaxies. Aspects of nuclear bursts of star formation, and the relationship between central activity and the gas and stellar dynamics of the host galaxy are addressed as well. The contributors to this book for professionals and graduate students are world experts on galaxy evolution.
There has been considerable progress in our understanding of how massive stars form but still much confusion as to why they form. Recent work from several sources has shown that the formation of massive stars through disc accretion, possibly aided by gravitational and Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities is a viable mechanism. Stellar mergers, on the other hand, are unlikely to occur in any but the most massive clusters and hence should not be a primary avenue for massive star formation. In contrast to this success, we are still uncertain as to how the mass that forms a massive star is accumulated. there are two possible mechanisms including the collapse of massive prestellar cores and competitive accretion in clusters. At present, there are theoretical and observational question marks as to the existence of high-mass prestellar cores. theoretically, such objects should fragment before they can attain a relaxed, centrally condensed and high-mass state necessary to form massive stars. Numerical simulations including cluster formation, feedback and magnetic fields have not found such objects but instead point to the continued accretion in a cluster potential as the primary mechanism to form high-mass stars. Feedback and magnetic fields act to slow the star formation process and will reduce the efficiencies from a purely dynamical collapse but otherwise appear to not significantly alter the process.
High resolution, multi-wavelength maps of a sizeable set of nearby galaxies have made it possible to study how the surface densities of H i, H2 and star formation rate (ΣHI, ΣH2, ΣSFR) relate on scales of a few hundred parsecs. At these scales, individual galaxy disks are comfortably resolved, making it possible to assess gas-SFR relations with respect to environment within galaxies. ΣH2, traced by CO intensity, shows a strong correlation with ΣSFR and the ratio between these two quantities, the molecular gas depletion time, appears to be constant at about 2 Gyr in large spiral galaxies. Within the star-forming disks of galaxies, ΣSFR shows almost no correlation with ΣHI. In the outer parts of galaxies, however, ΣSFR does scale with ΣHI, though with large scatter. Combining data from these different environments yields a distribution with multiple regimes in Σgas – ΣSFR space. If the underlying assumptions to convert observables to physical quantities are matched, even combined datasets based on different SFR tracers, methodologies and spatial scales occupy a well define locus in Σgas – ΣSFR space.
Low-mass protostars are less luminous than expected. This luminosity problem is important because the observations appear to be inconsistent with some of the basic premises of star formation theory. Two possible solutions are that stars form slowly, which is supported by recent data, and/or that protostellar accretion is episodic; current data suggest that the latter accounts for less than half the missing luminosity. The solution to the luminosity problem bears directly on the fundamental problem of the time required to form a low-mass star. The protostellar mass and luminosity functions provide powerful tools both for addressing the luminosity problem and for testing theories of star formation. Results are presented for the collapse of singular isothermal spheres, for the collapse of turbulent cores, and for competitive accretion.
Star formation is regulated through a variety of feedback processes. In this study, we treat feedback by metal injection and a UV background as well as by X-ray irradiation. Our aim is to investigate whether star formation is significantly affected when the ISM of a proto-galaxxy enjoys different metallicities and when a star forming cloud resides in the vicinity of a strong X-ray source. We perform cosmological Enzo simulations with a detailed treatment of non-zero metallicity chemistry and thermal balance. We also perform FLASH simulations with embedded Lagrangian sink particles of a collapsing molecular cloud near a massive, 107 M⊙, black hole that produces X-ray radiation.
We find that a multi-phase ISM forms for metallicites as small as 10−4 Solar at z = 6, with higher (10−2Z⊙) metallicities supporting a cold (<100 K) and dense (>103 cm−3) phase at higher (z = 20) redshift. A star formation recipe based on the presence of a cold dense phase leads to a self-regulating mode in the presence of supernova and radiation feedback. We also find that when there is strong X-ray feedback a collapsing cloud fragments into larger clumps whereby fewer but more massive protostellar cores are formed. This is a consequence of the higher Jeans mass in the warm (50 K, due to ionization heating) molecular gas. Accretion processes dominate the mass function and a near-flat, non-Salpeter IMF results.
We review the various theories which have been proposed along the years to explain the origin of the stellar initial mass function. We pay particular attention to four models, namely the competitive accretion and the theories based respectively on stopped accretion, MHD shocks and turbulent dispersion. In each case, we derive the main assumptions and calculations that support each theory and stress their respective successes and failures or difficulties.
Star formation depends on the available gaseous “fuel” as well as galactic environment, with higher specific star formation rates where gas is predominantly molecular and where stellar (and dark matter) densities are higher. The partition of gas into different thermal components must itself depend on the star formation rate, since a steady state distribution requires a balance between heating (largely from stellar UV for the atomic component) and cooling. In this presentation, I discuss a simple thermal and dynamical equilibrium model for the star formation rate in disk galaxies, where the basic inputs are the total surface density of gas and the volume density of stars and dark matter, averaged over ~kpc scales. Galactic environment is important because the vertical gravity of the stars and dark matter compress gas toward the midplane, helping to establish the pressure, and hence the cooling rate. In equilibrium, the star formation rate must evolve until the gas heating rate is high enough to balance this cooling rate and maintain the pressure imposed by the local gravitational field. In addition to discussing the formulation of this equilibrium model, I review the current status of numerical simulations of multiphase disks, focusing on measurements of quantities that characterize the mean properties of the diffuse ISM. Based on simulations, turbulence levels in the diffuse ISM appear relatively insensitive to local disk conditions and energetic driving rates, consistent with observations. It remains to be determined, both from observations and simulations, how mass exchange processes control the ratio of cold-to-warm gas in the atomic ISM.
Protostellar outflows can inject sufficient mass, momentum, and kinetic energy into their parent star-forming clumps to dramatically alter their structure, generate turbulence, and even to disrupt them. Outflows represent the lowest rung on a ‘feedback ladder’ consisting of increasingly powerful mechanisms which kick-in if star formation escalates towards the production of more massive stars, higher efficiency, and larger clusters. Outflow feedback may dominate turbulence generation and cloud disruption on the scale of cluster-forming clumps having dimensions up to a few parsecs. Outflows inject energy and momentum on a wide-range of length-scales from less than 0.01 pc to over 30 pc. However, they fail by several orders of magnitude to inject sufficient momentum and kinetic energy to drive turbulent motions on the size and mass-scales of GMCs. Injection from higher rungs on the feedback ladder or momentum injected by Galactic-scale processes are needed to power the observed turbulence on the 10 to 100 pc scales of GMCs.
It is now well established that the majority of young stars are found in multiple systems, so that any theory of stellar formation must account for their existence and properties. Studying the properties of multiple star systems therefore represents a very powerful approach to place observational constraints on star formation theories. Additionally, multiple systems offer other advantages. They provide the most accurate and unambiguous way to measure masses, using orbital fitting and Kepler's laws, and even the stellar radius in the special case of eclipsing binaries. They also allow to compare the properties of 2 coeval objects with different masses, providing important tests for the evolutionary models.
Ambipolar diffusion (AD) is a key process in molecular clouds (MCs). Non-ideal MHD turbulence simulations are technically very challenging because of the large Alfvén speed of ions in weakly ionized clouds. Using the Heavy-Ion Approximation method (Li, McKee & Klein 2006), we have carried out two-fluid simulations of AD in isothermal, turbulent boxes at a resolution of 5123, to investigate the effect of AD on the weakly ionized turbulence in MCs. Our simulation results show that the neutral gas component of the two-fluid system gradually transforms from an ideal MHD turbulence system to near a pure hydrodynamic turbulence system within the standard AD regime, in which the neutrals and ions are coupled over a flow time. The change of the turbulent state has a profound effect on the weakly ionized MCs.
Submillimeter observations are a key for answering many of the big questions in modern-day astrophysics, such as how stars and planets form, how galaxies evolve, and how material cycles through stars and the interstellar medium. With the upcoming large submillimeter facilities ALMA and Herschel a new window will open to study these questions. ARTIST is a project funded in context of the European ASTRONET program with the aim of developing a next generation model suite for comprehensive multi-dimensional radiative transfer calculations of the dust and line emission, as well as their polarization, to help interpret observations with these groundbreaking facilities.
This work presents a new physical model of the star formation rate (SFR), tested with a large set of numerical simulations of driven, supersonic, self-gravitating, magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence, where collapsing cores are captured with accreting sink particles. The model depends on the relative importance of gravitational, turbulent, magnetic, and thermal energies, expressed through the virial parameter, αvir, the rms sonic Mach number, S,0, and the ratio of mean gas pressure to mean magnetic pressure, β0. The SFR is predicted to decrease with increasing αvir (stronger turbulence relative to gravity), and to depend weakly on S,0 and β0, for values typical of star forming regions (S,0≈4-20 and β0≈1-20). The star-formation simulations used to test the model result in an approximately constant SFR, after an initial transient phase. Both the value of the SFR and its dependence on the virial parameter found in the simulations agree very well with the theoretical predictions.
We review an approach to observation-theory comparisons we call “Taste-Testing.” In this approach, synthetic observations are made of numerical simulations, and then both real and synthetic observations are “tasted” (compared) using a variety of statistical tests. We first lay out arguments for bringing theory to observational space rather than observations to theory space. Next, we explain that generating synthetic observations is only a step along the way to the quantitative, statistical, taste tests that offer the most insight. We offer a set of examples focused on polarimetry, scattering and emission by dust, and spectral-line mapping in star-forming regions. We conclude with a discussion of the connection between statistical tests used to date and the physics we seek to understand. In particular, we suggest that the “lognormal” nature of molecular clouds can be created by the interaction of many random processes, as can the lognormal nature of the IMF, so that the fact that both the “Clump Mass Function” (CMF) and IMF appear lognormal does not necessarily imply a direct relationship between them.