The phenomena of superfluidity and superconductivity are intimately connected with the existence of a condensate, a macroscopically occupied quantum state. Such condensates occur in a variety of different physical systems, as described in Chapter 1. The foundation for the description of superfluidity is a picture of the system as being comprised of a condensate and elementary excitations. In Chapter 8 we have seen how physical properties such as the energy and the density of a Bose–Einstein condensed system may be expressed in terms of a contribution from the condensate, plus one from the elementary excitations, and in this chapter we shall consider further developments of this basic idea to other situations. As a first application, we determine the critical velocity for creation of an excitation in a homogeneous system (Sec. 10.1). Following that, we show how to express the momentum density in terms of the velocity of the condensate and the distribution function for excitations. This provides the basis for a two-component description, the two components being the condensate and the thermal excitations (Sec. 10.2). In the past, this framework has proved to be very effective in describing the properties of superfluids and superconductors, and in Sec. 10.3 we apply it to dynamical processes.

To describe the state of a superfluid, one must specify the condensate velocity, in addition to the variables needed to characterize the state of an ordinary fluid. As a consequence, the collective behaviour of a superfluid is richer than that of an ordinary one. Collective modes are most simply examined when excitations collide frequently enough that they are in local thermodynamic equilibrium.

Bose–Einstein condensates of particles behave in many ways like coherent radiation fields, and the realization of Bose–Einstein condensation in dilute gases has opened up the experimental study of many aspects of interactions between coherent matter waves. In addition, the existence of these dilute trapped quantum gases has prompted a re-examination of a number of theoretical issues. This field is a vast one, and in this chapter we shall touch briefly on selected topics.

In Sec. 13.1 we describe the classic interference experiment, in which two clouds of atoms are allowed to expand and overlap. Rather surprisingly, an interference pattern is produced even though initially the two clouds are completely isolated. We shall analyse the reasons for this effect. The marked decrease in density fluctuations in a Bose gas when it undergoes Bose–Einstein condensation is demonstrated in Sec. 13.2. Gaseous Bose–Einstein condensates can be manipulated by lasers, and this has made possible the study of coherent matter wave optics. We describe applications of these techniques to observe solitons, Bragg scattering, and non-linear mixing of matter waves in Sec. 13.3. The atom laser and amplification of matter waves is taken up in Sec. 13.4. How to characterize Bose–Einstein condensation microscopically is the subject of Sec. 13.5, where we also consider fragmented condensates.

Interference of two condensates

One of the striking manifestations of the wave nature of Bose–Einstein condensates is the observation of an interference pattern when two condensed and initially separated clouds are allowed to overlap. An example is shown in Fig. 13.1.

Atomic properties of the alkali atoms play a key role in experiments on cold atomic gases, and we shall discuss them briefly in the present chapter. Basic atomic structure is the subject of Sec. 3.1. Two effects exploited to trap and cool atoms are the influence of a magnetic field on atomic energy levels, and the response of an atom to radiation. In Sec. 3.2 we describe the combined influence of the hyperfine interaction and the Zeeman effect on the energy levels of an atom, and in Sec. 3.3 we review the calculation of the atomic polarizability. In Sec. 3.4 we summarize and compare some energy scales.

Atomic structure

The total spin of a Bose particle must be an integer, and therefore a boson made up of fermions must contain an even number of them. Neutral atoms contain equal numbers of electrons and protons, and therefore the statistics that an atom obeys is determined solely by the number of neutrons N: if N is even, the atom is a boson, and if it is odd, a fermion. Since the alkalis have odd atomic number Z, boson alkali atoms have odd mass numbers A. In Table 3.1 we list N, Z, and the nuclear spin quantum number I for some alkali atoms and hydrogen.

Bose–Einstein condensates in dilute atomic gases, which were first realized experimentally in 1995 for rubidium, sodium, and lithium, provide unique opportunities for exploring quantum phenomena on a macroscopic scale. These systems differ from ordinary gases, liquids, and solids in a number of respects, as we shall now illustrate by giving typical values of some physical quantities.

The particle density at the centre of a Bose-Einstein condensed atomic cloud is typically 1013–1015 cm−3. By contrast, the density of molecules in air at room temperature and atmospheric pressure is about 1019 cm−3. In liquids and solids the density of atoms is of order 1022 cm−3, while the density of nucleons in atomic nuclei is about 1038 cm−3.

To observe quantum phenomena in such low-density systems, the temperature must be of order 10−5 K or less. This may be contrasted with the temperatures at which quantum phenomena occur in solids and liquids. In solids, quantum effects become strong for electrons in metals below the Fermi temperature, which is typically 104–105 K, and for phonons below the De bye temperature, which is typically of order 102 K. For the helium liquids, the temperatures required for observing quantum phenomena are of order 1 K. Due to the much higher particle density in atomic nuclei, the corresponding degeneracy temperature is about 1011 K.

The path that led in 1995 to the first realization of Bose–Einstein condensation in dilute gases exploited the powerful methods developed over the past quarter of a century for cooling alkali metal atoms by using lasers.

In this chapter we consider selected topics in the theory of trapped gases at non-zero temperature when the effects of interactions are taken into account. The task is to extend the considerations of Chapters 8 and 10 to allow for the trapping potential. In Sec. 11.1 we begin by discussing energy scales, and then calculate the transition temperature and thermodynamic properties. We show that at temperatures of the order of Tc the effect of interactions on thermodynamic properties of clouds in a harmonic trap is determined by the dimensionless parameter N1/6a/ā. Here ā, which is defined in Eq. (6.24), is the geometric mean of the oscillator lengths for the three principal axes of the trap. Generally this quantity is small, and therefore under many circumstances the effects of interactions are small. At low temperatures, thermodynamic properties may be evaluated in terms of the spectrum of elementary excitations of the cloud in its ground state, which we considered in Secs. 7.2, 7.3, and 8.2. At higher temperatures it is necessary to take into account thermal depletion of the condensate, and useful approximations for thermodynamic functions may be obtained using the Hartree–Fock theory as a starting point.

The remainder of the chapter is devoted to non-equilibrium phenomena. As we have seen in Secs. 10.3–10.5, two ingredients in the description of collective modes and other non-equilibrium properties of uniform gases are the two-component nature of condensed Bose systems, and collisions between excitations. For atoms in traps a crucial new feature is the in homogeneity of the gas. This in itself would not create difficulties if collisions between excitations were sufficiently frequent that matter remained in thermodynamic equilibrium locally.

The advent of the laser opened the way to the development of powerful new methods for manipulating and cooling atoms which were exploited in the realization of Bose–Einstein condensation in alkali atom vapours. To set the stage we describe a typical experiment, which is shown schematically in Fig. 4.1. A beam of sodium atoms emerges from an oven at a temperature of about 600 K, corresponding to a speed of about 800 m s–1, and is then passed through a so-called Zeeman slower, in which the velocity of the atoms is reduced to about 30 m s–1, corresponding to a temperature of about 1 K. In the Zeeman slower, a laser beam propagates in the direction opposite that of the atomic beam, and the radiation force produced by absorption of photons retards the atoms. Due to the Doppler effect, the frequency of the atomic transition in the laboratory frame is not generally constant, since the atomic velocity varies. However, by applying an inhomogeneous magnetic field designed so that the Doppler and Zeeman effects cancel, the frequency of the transition in the rest frame of the atom may be held fixed. On emerging from the Zeeman slower the atoms are slow enough to be captured by a magneto-optical trap (MOT), where they are further cooled by interactions with laser light to temperatures of order 100 μK. Another way of compensating for the changing Doppler shift is to increase the laser frequency in time, which is referred to as ‘chirping’. In other experiments the MOT is filled by transferring atoms from a second MOT where atoms are captured directly from the vapour.

The time-dependent behaviour of Bose–Einstein condensed clouds, such as collective modes and the expansion of a cloud when released from a trap, is an important source of information about the physical nature of the condensate. In addition, the spectrum of elementary excitations of the condensate is an essential ingredient in calculations of thermodynamic properties. In this chapter we treat the dynamics of a condensate at zero temperature starting from a time-dependent generalization of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation used in Chapter 6 to describe static properties. From this equation one may derive equations very similar to those of classical hydrodynamics, which we shall use to calculate properties of collective modes.

We begin in Sec. 7.1 by describing the time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation and deriving the hydrodynamic equations. We then use the hydrodynamic equations to determine the excitation spectrum of a homogeneous Bose gas (Sec. 7.2). Subsequently, we consider modes in trapped clouds (Sec. 7.3) within the hydrodynamic approach, and also describe the method of collective coordinates and the related variational method. In Sec. 7.4 we consider surface modes of oscillation, which resemble gravity waves on a liquid surface. The variational approach is used in Sec. 7.5 to treat the free expansion of a condensate upon release from a trap. Finally, in Sec. 7.6 we discuss solitons, which are exact one-dimensional solutions of the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation.

General formulation

In the previous chapter we saw that the equilibrium structure of the condensate is described by a time-independent Schrödinger equation with a nonlinear contribution to the potential to take into account interactions between particles.

The topic of Bose–Einstein condensation in a uniform, non-interacting gas of bosons is treated in most textbooks on statistical mechanics. In the present chapter we discuss the properties of a non-interacting Bose gas in a trap. We shall calculate equilibrium properties of systems in a semi-classical approximation, in which the energy spectrum is treated as a continuum. For this approach to be valid the temperature must be large compared with Δ∈/k, where Δ∈ denotes the separation between neighbouring energy levels. As is well known, at temperatures below the Bose–Einstein condensation temperature, the lowest energy state is not properly accounted for if one simply replaces sums by integrals, and it must be included explicitly.

The statistical distribution function is discussed in Sec. 2.1, as is the single-particle density of states, which is a key ingredient in the calculations of thermo dynamic properties. Calculations of the transition temperature and the fraction of particles in the condensate are described in Sec. 2.2. In Sec. 2.3 the semi-classical distribution function is introduced, and from this we determine the density profile and the velocity distribution of particles. Thermodynamic properties of Bose gases are calculated as functions of the temperature in Sec. 2.4. The final two sections are devoted to effects not captured by the simplest version of the semi-classical approximation: corrections to the transition temperature due to a finite particle number (Sec. 2.5), and thermodynamic properties of gases in lower dimensions (Sec. 2.6).

In preceding chapters we have explored properties of Bose–Einstein condensates with a single macroscopically-occupied quantum state, and spin degrees of freedom of the atoms were assumed to play no role. In the present chapter we extend the theory to systems in which two or more quantum states are macroscopically occupied.

The simplest example of such a multi-component system is a mixture of two different species of bosons, for example two isotopes of the same element, or two different atoms. The theory of such systems can be developed along the same lines as that for one-component systems developed in earlier chapters, and we do this in Sec. 12.1.

Since alkali atoms have spin, it is also possible to make mixtures of the same isotope, but in different internal spin states. This was first done experimentally by the JILA group, who made a mixture of atoms in hyperfine states F = 2, mF = 2 and F = 1, mF = –1. Mixtures of hyperfine states of the same isotope differ from mixtures of distinct isotopes because atoms can undergo transitions between hyperfine states, while transitions that convert one isotope into another do not occur under most circumstances. Transitions between different hyperfine states can influence equilibrium properties markedly if the interaction energy per particle is comparable with or larger than the energy difference between hyperfine levels. In magnetic traps it is difficult to achieve such conditions, since the trapping potential depends on the particular hyperfine state. However, in optical traps (see Sec. 4.2.2) the potential is independent of the hyperfine state, and the dynamics of the spin can be investigated, as has been done experimentally.

In the present chapter we consider the structure of the Bose–Einstein condensed state in the presence of interactions. Our discussion is based on the Gross–Pitaevskii equation, which describes the zero-temperature properties of the non-uniform Bose gas when the scattering length a is much less than the mean interparticle spacing. We shall first derive the Gross–Pitaevskii equation at zero temperature by treating the interaction between particles in a mean-field approximation (Sec. 6.1). Following that, in Sec. 6.2 we discuss the ground state of atomic clouds in a harmonic-oscillator potential. We compare results obtained by variational methods with those derived in the Thomas-Fermi approximation, in which the kinetic energy operator is neglected in the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. The Thomas–Fermi approximation fails near the surface of a cloud, and in Sec. 6.3 we calculate the surface structure using the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. Finally, in Sec. 6.4 we determine how the condensate wave function ‘heals’ when subjected to a localized disturbance.

The Gross–Pitaevskii equation

In the previous chapter we have shown that the effective interaction between two particles at low energies is a constant in the momentum representation, U0 = 4πħ2a/m. In coordinate space this corresponds to a contact interaction U0δ(r – r′), where r and r′ are the positions of the two particles. To investigate the energy of man y-body states we adopt a Hartree or mean-field approach, and assume that the wave function is a symmetrized product of single-particle wave functions.

From a theoretical point of view, one of the appealing features of clouds of alkali atom vapours is that particle separations, which are typically of order 102 nm, are large compared with the scattering length a which characterizes the strength of interactions. Scattering lengths for alkali atoms are of the order of 100a0, where a0, is the Bohr radius, and therefore alkali atom vapours are dilute, in the sense that the dominant effects of interaction are due to two-body encounters. It is therefore possible to calculate properties of the gas reliably from a knowledge of two-body scattering at low energies, which implies that information about atomic scattering is a key ingredient in work on Bose–Einstein condensates.

An alkali atom in its electronic ground state has several different hyperfine states, as we have seen in Secs. 3.1 and 3.2. Interatomic interactions give rise to transitions between these states and, as we described in Sec. 4.6, such processes are a major mechanism for loss of trapped atoms. In a scattering process, the internal states of the particles in the initial or final states are described by a set of quantum numbers, such as those for the spin, the atomic species, and their state of excitation. We shall refer to a possible choice of these quantum numbers as a channel.1 At the temperatures of interest for Bose-Einstein condensation, atoms are in their electronic ground states, and the only relevant internal states are therefore the hyperfine states. Because of the existence of several hyperfine states for a single atom, the scattering of cold alkali atoms is a multi-channel problem.

Introduction

Naturally, the scientific study of matter under extreme conditions is of fundamental interest, but it is also true that its direction and progress are largely determined by technological innovations. Also theorists generally stay within the bounds of what is (nearly) feasible, for even the best theories require verification. The technological development underlying the subject of this book is that of high-power lasers. Particularly the advent of affordable, ultra-short-pulsed lasers has considerably intensified the study of molecules and clusters in intense fields.

Two determining technical advances in this respect were the development of chirped pulse amplification (CPA) and the self-mode-locked Ti: sapphire laser (which has generated pulses as short as 7 fs). It is thus possible to build laboratory-scale systems that produce high-energy pulses (3–4 mJ in 20 fs), even at kilohertz repetition rates. An even more powerful system, a 100-TW, sub-20-fs laser system was demonstrated by Yamakawa et al., but at the lower repetition rate of 10 Hz. Extremely short pulses of only 4.5 fs – but still with energies as high as 70 μJ – were achieved with pulse compression techniques by Nisoli et al.

Particularly energetic laser pulses are required for the study of inertial-confinement fusion (ICF). At the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, for example, 660 J in a 440 ± 20-fs pulse can be focused down to an intensity > 7 × 1020 W cm−2.