Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Browse subjects
  3. Physics and Astronomy
  4. Condensed Matter Physics, Nanoscience and Mesoscopic Physics
  5. Content listing

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

6943 results in Condensed Matter Physics, Nanoscience and Mesoscopic Physics

Page 124 of 348

  • 1 - Second quantization

  • Gianluca Stefanucci, Università degli Studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Robert van Leeuwen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • Book:
    Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems
    Published online:
    05 March 2013
    Print publication:
    07 March 2013, pp 1-38

  • Summary

    Quantum mechanics of one particle

    In quantum mechanics the physical state of a particle is described in terms of a ket |Ψ〉. This ket belongs to a Hilbert space which is nothing but a vector space endowed with an inner product. The dimension of the Hilbert space is essentially fixed by our physical intuition; it is we who decide which kets are relevant for the description of the particle. For instance, if we want to describe how a laser works we can choose those energy eigenkets that get populated and depopulated and discard the rest. This selection of states leads to the well-known description of a laser in terms of a three-level system, four-level system, etc. A fundamental property following from the vector nature of the Hilbert space is that any linear superposition of kets is another ket in the Hilbert space. In other words we can make a linear superposition of physical states and the result is another physical state. In quantum mechanics, however, it is only the “direction” of the ket that matters, so |Ψ〉 and C|Ψ〉 represent the same physical state for all complex numbers C. This redundancy prompts us to work with normalized kets. What do we mean by that? We said before that there is an inner product in the Hilbert space.

  • 8 - Conserving approximations: two-particle Green's function

  • Gianluca Stefanucci, Università degli Studi di Roma 'Tor Vergata', Robert van Leeuwen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • Book:
    Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems
    Published online:
    05 March 2013
    Print publication:
    07 March 2013, pp 235-248

  • Summary

    Introduction

    In this and the next two chapters we lay down the basis to go beyond the Hartree–Fock approximation. We develop a powerful approximation method with two main distinctive features. The first feature is that the approximations are conserving. A major difficulty in the theory of nonequilibrium processes consists in generating approximate Green's functions yielding a particle density n(x, t) and a current density J(x, t) which satisfy the continuity equation, or a total momentum P(t) and a Lorentz force F(t) which is the time-derivative of P(t), or a total energy E(t) and a total power which is the time-derivative of E(t), etc. All these fundamental relations express the conservation of some physical quantity. In equilibrium the current is zero and hence the density is conserved, i.e., it is the same at all times; the force is zero and hence the momentum is conserved; the power fed into the system is zero and hence the energy is conserved, etc. The second important feature is that every approximation has a clear physical interpretation. In Chapter 7 we showed that the two-particle Green's function in the Hartree and Hartree–Fock approximation can be represented diagrammatically as in Fig. 7.1 and Fig. 7.2 respectively. In these diagrams two particles propagate from (1′, 2′) to (1, 2) as if there was no interaction.

Page 124 of 348