Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-88psn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T09:05:29.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Branching processes in random environments with thresholds

Part of: Stochastic processes Markov processes Limit theorems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Giacomo Francisci Open the ORCID record for Giacomo Francisci [Opens in a new window]  and
Anand N. Vidyashankar
Giacomo Francisci*
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Anand N. Vidyashankar*
Affiliation:
George Mason University
*
*Postal address: Department of Statistics, George Mason University, 4000 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
*Postal address: Department of Statistics, George Mason University, 4000 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Motivated by applications to COVID dynamics, we describe a model of a branching process in a random environment $\{Z_n\}$ whose characteristics change when crossing upper and lower thresholds. This introduces a cyclical path behavior involving periods of increase and decrease leading to supercritical and subcritical regimes. Even though the process is not Markov, we identify subsequences at random time points $\{(\tau_j, \nu_j)\}$—specifically the values of the process at crossing times, viz. $\{(Z_{\tau_j}, Z_{\nu_j})\}$—along which the process retains the Markov structure. Under mild moment and regularity conditions, we establish that the subsequences possess a regenerative structure and prove that the limiting normal distributions of the growth rates of the process in supercritical and subcritical regimes decouple. For this reason, we establish limit theorems concerning the length of supercritical and subcritical regimes and the proportion of time the process spends in these regimes. As a byproduct of our analysis, we explicitly identify the limiting variances in terms of the functionals of the offspring distribution, threshold distribution, and environmental sequences.

Keywords

BPRECOVID dynamicsergodicity of Markov chainsestimators of growth ratelength of cyclesmartingalesrandom sumsregenerative structuresize-dependent branching processsize-dependent branching process with a thresholdsubcritical regimesupercritical regime

MSC classification

Primary: 60J80: Branching processes (Galton-Watson, birth-and-death, etc.) 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems 60J10: Markov chains (discrete-time Markov processes on discrete state spaces)
Secondary: 92D25: Population dynamics (general) 92D30: Epidemiology 60G50: Sums of independent random variables; random walks

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 2024 , pp. 495 - 544
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Jagers, P. (1975). Branching Processes with Biological Applications. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Haccou, P., Jagers, P. and Vatutin, V. A. (2007). Branching Processes: Variation, Growth, and Extinction of Populations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, B. and Vidyashankar, A. N. (2011). Inference for quantitation parameters in polymerase chain reactions via branching processes with random effects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106, 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M. and Axelrod, D. E. (2015). Branching Processes in Biology. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanev, N. M., Stoimenova, V. K. and Atanasov, D. V. (2020). Stochastic modeling and estimation of COVID-19 population dynamics. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atanasov, D., Stoimenova, V. and Yanev, N. M. (2021). Branching process modelling of COVID-19 pandemic including immunity and vaccination. Stoch. Quality Control 36, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcó, C. and Corral, Á. (2022). Finite-time scaling for epidemic processes with power-law superspreading events. Phys. Rev. E 105, article no. 064122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, H., Kryven, I. and Bianconi, G. (2022). Critical time-dependent branching process modelling epidemic spreading with containment measures. J. Phys. A 55, article no. 224006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebaner, F. C. (1993). Population-dependent branching processes with a threshold. Stoch. Process. Appl. 46, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teschl, G. (2012). Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perko, L. (2013). Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Iannelli, M. and Pugliese, A. (2014). An Introduction to Mathematical Population Dynamics. Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R., Haines, S. and Hodges, K. E. (2010). Modelling the Canada lynx and snowshoe hare population cycle: the role of specialist predators. Theoret. Ecol. 3, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, K. and Earn, D. J. D. (2015). A century of transitions in New York City’s measles dynamics. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, article no. 20150024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Athreya, K. B. and Karlin, S. (1971). On branching processes with random environments: I: Extinction probabilities. Ann. Math. Statist. 42, 1499–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersting, G. and Vatutin, V. A. (2017). Discrete Time Branching Processes in Random Environment. John Wiley, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athreya, K. B. and Schuh, H.-J. (2016). A Galton–Watson process with a threshold. J. Appl. Prob. 53, 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebaner, F. C. (1984). On population-size-dependent branching processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 16, 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayster, P. (2005). Alternating branching processes. J. Appl. Prob. 42, 1095–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, P. and Klebaner, F. C. (2011). Population-size-dependent, age-structured branching processes linger around their carrying capacity. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, P. and Zuyev, S. (2020). Populations in environments with a soft carrying capacity are eventually extinct. J. Math. Biol. 81, 845–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagers, P. and Zuyev, S. (2021). Amendment to: populations in environments with a soft carrying capacity are eventually extinct. J. Math. Biol. 83, article no. 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dion, J. P. and Esty, W. W. (1979). Estimation problems in branching processes with random environments. Ann. Statist. 680–685.Google Scholar
Heyde, C. C. (1971). Some central limit analogues for supercritical Galton–Watson processes. J. Appl. Prob. 8, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamperti, J. (1960). Criteria for the recurrence or transience of stochastic process. I. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1, 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamperti, J. (1963). Criteria for stochastic processes II: passage-time moments. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfozo, R. (2009). Basics of Applied Stochastic Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billingsley, P. (2013). Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Heyde, C. C. (1980). Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Roitershtein, A. (2007). A note on multitype branching processes with immigration in a random environment. Ann. Prob. 4, 1573–1592.Google Scholar
Ibragimov, I. A. and Linnik, Y. V. (1971). Independent and Stationary Sequences of Random Variables. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar