Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:10:31.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Matrix calculations for moments of Markov processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2022

Andrew Daw*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Jamol Pender*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
*
*Postal address: Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, 401B Bridge Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089. Email address: andrew.daw@usc.edu
**Postal address: School of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell University, 228 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Abstract

Matryoshka dolls, the traditional Russian nesting figurines, are known worldwide for each doll’s encapsulation of a sequence of smaller dolls. In this paper, we exploit the structure of a new sequence of nested matrices we call matryoshkan matrices in order to compute the moments of the one-dimensional polynomial processes, a large class of Markov processes. We characterize the salient properties of matryoshkan matrices that allow us to compute these moments in closed form at a specific time without computing the entire path of the process. This simplifies the computation of the polynomial process moments significantly. Through our method, we derive explicit expressions for both transient and steady-state moments of this class of Markov processes. We demonstrate the applicability of this method through explicit examples such as shot noise processes, growth–collapse processes, ephemerally self-exciting processes, and affine stochastic differential equations from the finance literature. We also show that we can derive explicit expressions for the self-exciting Hawkes process, for which finding closed-form moment expressions has been an open problem since their introduction in 1971. In general, our techniques can be used for any Markov process for which the infinitesimal generator of an arbitrary polynomial is itself a polynomial of equal or lower order.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Applied Probability Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerer, D., Filipović, D. and Pulido, S. (2018). The Jacobi stochastic volatility model. Finance Stoch. 22, 667700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
At-Sahalia, Y., Cacho-Diaz, J. and Laeven, R. J. (2015). Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes. J. Financial Econom. 117, 585606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benth, F. E. and Lavagnini, S. (2021). Correlators of polynomial processes. SIAM J. Financial Math. 12, 13741415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagini, F. and Zhang, Y. (2016). Polynomial diffusion models for life insurance liabilities. Insurance Math. Econom. 71, 114129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bladt, M., Asmussen, S. and Steffensen, M. (2019). Matrix calculations for inhomogeneous Markov reward processes, with applications to life insurance and point processes. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04605.Google Scholar
Boxma, O., Kella, O. and Perry, D. (2011). On some tractable growth–collapse processes with renewal collapse epochs. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 217234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxma, O., Perry, D., Stadje, W. and Zacks, S. (2006). A Markovian growth–collapse model. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 221243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brawer, R. and Pirovino, M. (1992). The linear algebra of the Pascal matrix. Linear Algebra Appl. 174, 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, G. S. and Velleman, D. J. (1993). Pascal’s matrices. Amer. Math. Monthly 100, 372376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuchiero, C. (2019). Polynomial processes in stochastic portfolio theory. Stoch. Process. Appl. 129, 18291872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuchiero, C., Keller-Ressel, M. and Teichmann, J. (2012). Polynomial processes and their applications to mathematical finance. Finance Stoch. 16, 711740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuchiero, C., Larsson, M. and Svaluto-Ferro, S. (2018). Polynomial jump-diffusions on the unit simplex. Ann. Appl. Prob. 28, 24512500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., Hawkes, A. and Yi, H. (2020). An elementary derivation of moments of Hawkes processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 52, 102137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, L., Wu, B. and Yin, J. (2021). Moments for Hawkes processes with gamma decay kernel functions. To appear in Methodology Comput. Appl. Prob. Google Scholar
Da Fonseca, J. and Zaatour, R. (2014). Hawkes process: fast calibration, application to trade clustering, and diffusive limit. J. Futures Markets 34, 548579.Google Scholar
Daley, D. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. I, Elementary Theory and Methods. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Dassios, A. and Zhao, H. (2011). A dynamic contagion process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 43, 814846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daw, A. and Pender, J. (2018). Queues driven by Hawkes processes. Stoch. Systems 8, 192229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daw, A. and Pender, J. (2022). An ephemerally self-exciting point process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 54, 340–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D., Pan, J. and Singleton, K. (2000). Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions. Econometrica 68, 13431376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, A. and Strang, G. (2004). Pascal matrices. Amer. Math. Monthly 111, 189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errais, E., Giesecke, K. and Goldberg, L. R. (2010). Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk. SIAM J. Financial Math. 1, 642665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (2009). Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Filipović, D. and Larsson, M. (2016). Polynomial diffusions and applications in finance. Finance Stoch. 20, 931972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, D. and Larsson, M. (2020). Polynomial jump-diffusion models. Stoch. Systems 10, 7197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, J. L. and Sørensen, M. (2008). The Pearson diffusions: a class of statistically tractable diffusion processes. Scand. J. Statist. 35, 438465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fralix, B. (2020). On classes of Bitcoin-inspired infinite-server queueing systems. Queueing Systems 95, 2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frolkova, M. and Mandjes, M. (2019). A Bitcoin-inspired infinite-server model with a random fluid limit. Stoch. Models 35, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X. and Zhu, L. (2018). Limit theorems for Markovian Hawkes processes with a large initial intensity. Stoch. Process. Appl. 128, 38073839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X. and Zhu, L. (2019). Affine point processes: refinements to large-time asymptotics. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.06371.Google Scholar
Guasoni, P. and Wong, K. C. (2020). Asset prices in segmented and integrated markets. Finance Stoch. 24, 939980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, J. K. and Lunel, S. M. V. (2013). Introduction to Functional Differential Equations. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Hawkes, A. G. (1971). Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58, 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry-Labordère, P. (2008). Analysis, Geometry, and Modeling in Finance: Advanced Methods in Option Pricing. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, V. B. (1985). A generalization of the classical teletraffic theory. In Proc. Eleventh International Teletraffic Congress, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 5864.Google Scholar
Iversen, V. B. (ed.) (2005). Teletraffic Engineering Handbook. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.Google Scholar
Javier, K. and Fralix, B. (2020). A further study of some Markovian Bitcoin models from Göbel et al. Stoch. Models 36, 223250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kella, O. (2009). On growth–collapse processes with stationary structure and their shot-noise counterparts. J. Appl. Prob. 46, 363371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kella, O. and Löpker, A. (2010). A Markov-modulated growth collapse model. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 24, 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, D. (2018). Predicting the confirmation time of Bitcoin transactions. Preprint. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10596.Google Scholar
Koops, D. T., Saxena, M., Boxma, O. J. and Mandjes, M. (2018). Infinite-server queues with Hawkes input. J. Appl. Prob. 55, 920943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazet, O. (1997). Classification des semi-groupes de diffusion sur IR associés à une famille de polynômes orthogonaux. In Séminaire de Probabilités XXXI, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 4053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, W. W., Charanek, A. and Maddah, B. (2018). MAP fitting by count and inter-arrival moment matching. Stoch. Models 34, 292321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, B. F., Nilsson, L. F., Thygesen, U. H. and Beyer, J. E. (2007). Higher order moments and conditional asymptotics of the batch Markovian arrival process. Stoch. Models 23, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Øksendal, B. (2013). Stochastic Differential Equations: an Introduction with Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wallström, B. (1964). A distribution model for telephone traffic with varying call intensity, including overflow traffic. Ericsson Technics 20, 183202.Google Scholar
Wong, E. (1964). The construction of a class of stationary Markoff processes. Stoch. Process. Math. Phys. Eng. 17, 264276.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Blanchet, J., Giesecke, K. and Glynn, P. W. (2015). Affine point processes: approximation and efficient simulation. Math. Operat. Res. 40, 797819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (1997). The linear algebra of the generalized Pascal matrix. Linear Algebra Appl. 250, 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar