Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:11:08.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Remark on the Van Lieshout and Baddeley J-Function for Point Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

T. Bedford*
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
J. Van Den Berg*
Affiliation:
CWI
*
Postal address: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
∗∗ Postal address: CWI, Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

The empty space function of a stationary point process in ℝd is the function that assigns to each r, r > 0, the probability that there is no point within distance r of O. In a recent paper Van Lieshout and Baddeley study the so-called J-function, which is defined as the ratio of the empty space function of a stationary point process and that of its corresponding reduced Palm process. They advocate the use of the J-function as a characterization of the type of spatial interaction.

Therefore it is natural to ask whether J ≡ 1 implies that the point process is Poisson. We restrict our analysis to the one-dimensional case and show that a classical construction by Szász provides an immediate counterexample. In this example the interpoint distances are still exponentially distributed. This raises the question whether it is possible to have J ≡ 1 but non-exponentially distributed interpoint distances. We construct a point process with J ≡ 1 but where the interpoint distances are bounded.

Type
Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedford, T. and Meilijson, I. (1993) A characterisation of marginal distributions of (possibly dependent) lifetime variables which right censor each other. Report 93-116. TU Delft.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (1988) An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Van Lieshout, M. N. M. and Baddeley, A. (1996) A nonparametric measure of spatial interaction in point patterns. Statist. Neerlandica. 50, 344361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. and Mecke, J. (1995) Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
SzÁSz, D. (1970) Once more on the Poisson process. Studia Sci. Math. Hungarica 5, 441444.Google Scholar