Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:28:57.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Comments on the Use of Mathematical Models in Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dwight W. Read
Dwight W. Read*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology,University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has become increasingly apparent that mathematical models may play a significant role in anthropological methodology. Less apparent is the fact that such models have an important place in formulation of theory as well. At the same time, many errors appear in attempts to use mathematical models. This paper attempts to indicate the nature of such errors and a methodology by which they can be avoided. A case study is presented showing the relationship of mathematical models to anthropological theory.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 3 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charles, Ackerman 1964 Structure and statistics: the Purum case. American Anthropologist 64:53–65.Google Scholar
Brainerd, G. W. 1951 The place of chronological ordering in archaeological analysis. American Antiquity 16:301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrétien, Douglas 1966 Comments on Driver's article “Geographical-historical versus psychofunctional explanations of kin avoidances.” Current Anthropology 7:148–149.Google Scholar
Davenport, William 1960 Jamaican fishing: a game theory analysis. Yale University Publications in Anthropology 59:3–11.Google Scholar
Driver, Harold E. 1966 Geographical-historical versus psycho-functional explanations of kin avoidances. Current Anthropology 7:131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, H. E., and Sanday, P. R. 1966 Untitled. Unpublished manuscript in possession of author.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C. 1970 Seriation method and its evaluation. American Antiquity 35:305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, Alan E. 1971 Seriation methods for archaeological materials. American Antiquity 36:263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Peter R. 1963 Man against his environment: a game theoretic framework. Association of American Geographers, Annals 53:290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Marvin 1968 The Rise of Anthropological Theory. Thomas Y. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
F. R”, Hodson D. G., Kendall, and Tatutu, P. 1971 Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip, Ford, James A. and Griffin, James B. 1951 Archaeological survey in the Lower Mississippi alluvial valley, 1940-1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 25.Google Scholar
Read, Dwight W., and Read, Catherine E. 1970 A critique of Davenport's game theory analysis. American Anthropologist 72:351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity 16:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Harrison C. 1963 An Anatomy of Kinship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar