Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Using mechanistic animal growth models to estimate genetic parameters of biological traits

  • A. B. Doeschl-Wilson (a1), P. W. Knap (a2), B. P. Kinghorn (a3) and H. A. M. Van der Steen (a4)
Abstract

Mechanistic animal growth models can incorporate a description of the genotype as represented by underlying biological traits that aim to specify the animal's genetic potential for performance, independent from the environmental factors captured by the models. It can be argued that these traits may therefore be more closely associated to genetic potential, or components of genetic merit that are more robust across environments, than the environmentally dependent phenotypic traits currently used for genetic evaluation. The prediction of merit for underlying biological traits can be valuable for breeding and development of selection strategies across environments.

Model inversion has been identified as a valid method for obtaining estimates of phenotypic and genetic components of the biological traits representing the genotype in the mechanistic model. The present study shows how these estimates were obtained for two existing pig breeds based on genetic and phenotypic components of existing performance trait records. Some of the resulting parameter estimates associated with each breed differ substantially, implying that the genetic differences between the breeds are represented in the underlying biological traits. The estimated heritabilities for the genetic potentials for growth, carcass composition and feed efficiency as represented by biological traits exceed the heritability estimates of related phenotypic traits that are currently used in evaluation processes for both breeds. The estimated heritabilities for maintenance energy requirements are however relatively small, suggesting that traits associated with basic survival processes have low heritability, provided that maintenance processes are appropriately represented by the model.

The results of this study suggest that mechanistic animal growth models can be useful to animal breeding through the introduction of new biological traits that are less influenced by environmental factors than phenotypic traits currently used. Potential value comes from the estimation of underlying biological trait components and the explicit description of their expression across a range of environments as predicted by the model equations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Using mechanistic animal growth models to estimate genetic parameters of biological traits
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Using mechanistic animal growth models to estimate genetic parameters of biological traits
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Using mechanistic animal growth models to estimate genetic parameters of biological traits
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* E-mail: andrea.wilson@sac.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Black, JL, Davies, GT, Bray, HJ, Giles, LR and Chapple, RP 1995. Modelling the effects of the genotype, environment and health on nutrient utilization. In Modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals (ed. Danfaer, A and Lescoat, P), pp. 85-106. Danish Institute of Animal Science, Foulum.
Blasco, A, Piles, M and Varona, L 2003. A Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for growth rate on growth curves in rabbits. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 21-41.
Cameron, ND 1997. Selection Indices and prediction of genetic merit in animal breeding. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
Chang, Y-M, Rekaya, R, Gianola, D and Thomas, DL 2001. Genetic variation of lactation curves in dairy sheep: a Bayesian analysis of Wood's function. Livestock Production Science 71, 241-251.
De Vries, AG and Kanis, E 1992. A growth model to estimate economic value for food intake capacity in pig. Animal Production 55, 241-246.
Doeschl-Wilson, AB, Knap, PW and Kinghorn, BP 2006. Specifying animal genotypes through model inversion. In Mechanistic pig and poultry models (ed. Gous, RM and Morris, T), pp. 163-187. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
Emmans, GC 1988. Genetic components of potential and actual growth. In Animal breeding opportunities (ed. Land, RB and Bulfield, G and Hill, WG), British Society of Animal Production, occasional publication no. 12, pp. 153-181. BSAS, Edinburgh.
Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 1995. A general method for predicting the weight of water in the empty body of the pig. Animal Science 61, 103-108.
Emmans, GC and Fisher, C 1996. Problems in nutritional theory. In Nutrient Requirements of poultry and nutritional research (ed. Fisher, C and Boorman, KN). pp. 9-39, Butterworths, London.
Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 1997. Models of pig growth: problems and proposed solutions. Livestock Production Science 51, 119-129.
Fernandez, A, Rodrguez, MC, Rodriganez, J, Silio, L and Toro, MA 2002. Use of Bayesian analysis of growth functions to estimate crossbreeding parameters in Iberian pigs. Livestock Production Science 73(2), 213-223.
Ferguson, NS and Gous, RM 1993a. Evaluation of pig genotypes. 1. Theoretical aspects of measuring genetic parameters. Animal Production 56, 233-243.
Ferguson, NS and Gous, RM 1993b. Evaluation of pig genotypes. 2. Testing experimental procedure. Animal Production 56, 245-249.
, NS, Gous, RM and Emmans, GC 1997. Predicting the effects of animal variation on growth and food intake in growing pigs using simulation modelling. Animal Science 64, 513-522.
Fowler, VR, Bichard, M and Pease, A 1976. Objectives in pig breeding. Animal Production 23, 365-387.
Glazier, DS 2002. Resource-allocation rules and the heritability of traits. Evolution 56(8), 1696-1700.
Groeneveld, E 1996. REML VCE V3.2 user's guide. Institute of Animal Husbandry and. Animal Ethology, Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany.
Kirkpatrick, M, Lofsvold, D and Bulmer, M 1990. Analysis of the Inheritance, Selection and Evolution of Growth Trajectories. Genetics 124, 979-993.
Knap, PW 1999. Simulation of growth in pigs: evaluation of a model to relate thermoregulation to body protein and lipid content and deposition. Animal Science 68, 655-679.
Knap, PW 2000a. Time trends of Gompertz growth parameters in “meat type” pigs. Animal Science 70, 39-49.
Knap, PW 2000b. Stochastic simulation of growth in pigs: relations between body composition and maintenance requirements as mediated through protein turnover and thermoregulation. Animal Science 71, 11-30.
Knap, PW 2000c. Variation in maintenance requirements of growing pigs in relation to body composition. A simulation study. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Knap, PW, Roehe, R, Kolstad, K, Pomar, C and Luiting, P 2003. Characterization of pig genotypes for growth modelling. Journal of Animal Science 81, (E-suppl. 2) E187-E195, www.asas.org/symposia/03esupp2/jas2593.pdf.
Knap, PW and Schrama, JW 1996. Simulation of growth in pigs: approximation of protein turnover parameters. Animal Science 63, 533-547.
Ma Chang-Xing, G, Casella, G and Wu, R 2002. Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. Genetics 161, 1751-1762.
McKay, RM 1992. Preweaning growth for Yorkshire, Hampshire and Landrace Pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 56-61.
Mayer, DG, Kinghorn, BP and Archer, AA 2005. Differential evolution -an easy and efficient evolutionary algorithm for model optimization. Agricultural Systems 83, 315-328.
Moughan, PJ and Verstegen, MWA 1988. The modelling of growth in the pigs. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 145-166.
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Storn, R and Price, K 1997. Differential evolution: A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11, 341-359.
Tarantola, A 1987. Inverse problem theory: methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc., New York.
Taylor, St. CS 1985. Use of genetics size-scaling in evaluation of animal growth. J. Anim. Sci. 61, (Suppl. 2) 118-143.
Varona, L, Moreno, C, Cortes, L and Altarriba, J 1997. Multiple trait genetic analysis of underlying biological variables of production functions. Livestock Production Science 47, 201-209.
Varona, L, Moreno, C, Cortes, L and Altarriba, J 1998. Bayesian analysis of Wood's lactation curve for Spanish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1469-1478.
Whittemore, CT and Fawcett, RH 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22, 87-96.
Whittemore, CT 1983. Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11, 159-186.
Wood, PDP 1976. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature (London) 216, 164-165.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

animal
  • ISSN: 1751-7311
  • EISSN: 1751-732X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed