Skip to main content Accessibility help

Sustainable archaeology: soothing rhetoric for an anxious institution

  • Richard M. Hutchings (a1) and Marina La Salle (a2)


The primary objective of sustainable archaeology is to maintain the profession of archaeology—that is, to sustain itself. An effort to rebrand the discipline as virtuous, sustainable archaeology is self-serving and reflects larger institutional anxieties around an unethical past and an uncertain future. An example of futurist rhetoric and doublespeak, sustainable archaeology exists because archaeology is unsustainable.


Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence (Email:


Hide All
Baptista, J.A. 2014. The ideology of sustainability and the globalization of a future. Time & Society 23: 358–79.
Berg, L.D., Huijbens, E.H. & Larsen, H.G.. 2016. Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer 60: 168–80.
Berkes, F., Armitage, D. & Doubleday, N.. 2007. Synthesis, in Armitage, D., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N. (ed.) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance: 308–27. Vancouver: UBC.
Brightman, M. & Lewis, J.. (ed.). 2017. The anthropology of sustainability: beyond development and progress. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chapman, H.P. 2002. Global warming: the implications for sustainable archaeological resource management. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 5: 241–45.
Childs, T. & Benden, D.. 2017. A checklist for sustainable management of archaeological collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5: 1225.
Fassbinder, S.D. 2017. The literature of the Anthropocene: four reviews. Capitalism Nature Socialism 28(1): 139–48.
Ferris, N., Cannon, A. & Welch, J.. 2018. Objects as stepping stones: sustainable archaeology. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 42: 412.
Flatman, J. 2009. Conserving marine cultural heritage: threats, risks and future priorities. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11: 58.
Gnecco, C. 2018. Development and disciplinary complicity: contract archaeology in South America under the critical gaze. Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 279–93.
González-Ruibal, A. 2018. Ethics of archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 345–60.
Henderson, N. 2019. Tim Scott smashes the black GOP ‘bargain’ over King. CNN 12 January. Available at: (accessed 8 September 2019).
Högberg, A., Holtorf, C., May, S. & Wollentz, G.. 2017. No future in archaeological heritage management? World Archaeology 49: 639–47.
Hutchings, R.M. 2017. Maritime heritage in crisis: Indigenous landscapes and global ecological breakdown. London: Routledge.
Hutchings, R.M. 2019. Meeting the shadow: resource management and the McDonaldization of heritage stewardship, in Wells, J. & Stiefel, B. (ed.) Human-centered built environment heritage preservation: theory and evidence-based practice: 6787. London: Routledge.
Hutchings, R.M. In press. Disciplinary complicity: the university, material culture studies and environmental crisis, in De Cunzo, L. & Roeber, C.D. (ed.) Cambridge University Press handbook of material culture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchings, R.M. & Dent, J.. 2017. Archaeology and the late modern state: introduction to the special issue. Archaeologies 13: 125.
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2015a. Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 699720.
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2015b. Why archaeologists misrepresent their practice—a North American perspective. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 2: S1117.
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2017. Archaeology as state heritage crime. Archaeologies 13: 6687.
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2018. Salvaging archaeology: why cultural resource management is not part of the ‘new public archaeology’. Antiquity Project Gallery 92(365): e10.
King, T.F. 2009. Our unprotected heritage: whitewashing the destruction of our natural and cultural heritage. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
La Salle, M. & Hutchings, R.M.. 2018. ‘What could be more reasonable?’ collaboration in colonial contexts, in Labrador, A.M. & Silberman, N.A. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of public heritage theory and practice: 223–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Majewski, T. 2017. The business of CRM: achieving sustainability and sustaining professionalism, in McManamon, F. (ed.) New perspectives in cultural resource management: 164–78. London: Routledge.
McNiven, I.J. & Russell, L.. 2005. Appropriated pasts: Indigenous peoples and the colonial culture of archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.
Smith, L. 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge.
Spennemann, D.H.R. 2007a. Futurist rhetoric in US historic preservation: a review of current practice. International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing 4: 9199.
Spennemann, D.H.R. 2007b. The futurist stance of historical societies: an analysis of position statements. International Journal of Arts Management 9: 415.
Sustainable Archaeology. n.d. About. Available at: (accessed 8 September 2018).
Tainter, J.A. 2000. Problem solving: complexity, history, sustainability. Population and Environment 22: 341.
Wilk, R.R. 1985. The ancient Maya and the political present. Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 307–26.
Zimmerman, L. 2018. Changing archaeology's ‘brand’ would be helpful. Antiquity 92: 523–24.


Sustainable archaeology: soothing rhetoric for an anxious institution

  • Richard M. Hutchings (a1) and Marina La Salle (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed