Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-hsbzg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-01T19:49:42.625Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Laurie Beth Feldman  and
Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín
Laurie Beth Feldman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, and Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT 06511. lfeldman@albany.eduhttp://www.albany.edu/~lf503/
Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Dynamique du Language, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Sciences de l'Homme, 69363 Lyon Cedex 07, France. fermosc@gmail.comhttp://www.moscosodelprado.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparisons across languages have long been a means to investigate universal properties of the cognitive system. Although differences between languages may be salient, it is the underlying similarities that have advanced our understanding of language processing. Frost is not unique in emphasizing that the interaction among linguistic codes reinforces the inadequacy of constructing a model of word recognition where orthographic processes operate in isolation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feldman, L. B. & Andjelković, D. (1992) Morphological analysis in word recognition. In: Phonology, orthography, morphology and meaning, ed. Frost, R. & Katz, L., pp. 343–60. North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B. & Bentin, S. (1994) Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 47A:407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Frost, R. & Pnini, T. (1995) Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21:947–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Gvozdenović, V., O'Connor, P. A. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2012) Early morpho-semantic processing in Serbian: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review 16:684–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A. & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009) Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review 16:684–91. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A. & Forster, K. I. (2000a) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory, and Cognition 26:751–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000b) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition 28:1277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I. & Deutsch, A. (1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 23(4):829–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Frost, R., Katz, L. & Bentin, S. (1987) Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13:104–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A. & Forster, K. I. (2005) Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(6):1293–326.Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R.,De Jong, N., & Baayen, R. H. (2005) Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language 53:496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. & New, B. (2004) The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11:1090–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckl, J. G. & Aicher, K. A. (2008) Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:972–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed