Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T02:49:18.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

David L. Share
David L. Share*
Affiliation:
Department of Learning Disabilities and Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning Disabilities, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. dshare@edu.haifa.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that the study of variability rather than invariance should head the reading research agenda, and that strong claims of orthographic “optimality” are unwarranted. I also expand briefly on Frost's assertion that an efficient orthography must represent sound and meaning, by considering writing systems as dual-purpose devices that must provide decipherability for novice readers and automatizability for the expert.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 307 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Asfaha, Y. M., Kurvers, J. & Kroon, S. (2009) Grain size in script and teaching: Literacy acquisition in Ge'ez and Latin. Applied Psycholinguistics 30:709–24.Google Scholar
Bendor-Samuel, J. (1996) African languages. In: The world's writing systems, ed. Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W., pp. 689–91. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, A. S.-W. (2011) Bodies and codas or core syllables plus appendices? Evidence for a developmental theory of subsyllabic division preference. Cognition 121:338–62.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1996a) The invention of writing. In: The world's writing systems, ed. Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W., pp. 474–84. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W. ed. (1996) The world's writing systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. C. (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 32:429–92.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. (1952) A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1982) The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequence. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioural and Brain Sciences 33:61–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuipers, J. C. & McDermott, R. (1996) Insular Southeast Asian scripts. In: The world's writing systems, ed. Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W., pp. 474–84. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55(2):151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (2008a) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin 134(4):584–615.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008b) Orthographic learning, phonology and the self-teaching hypothesis. In: Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 36, ed. Kail, R., pp. 31–82. Elsevier.Google Scholar