Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-8cclj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-02T07:11:53.935Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The limitations of structural priming are not the limits of linguistic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

David Adger*
Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.


Structural priming is a useful technique for testing the predictions of linguistic theories, but one cannot conclude anything definitively about the shape of those theories from any particular methodology.

Open Peer Commentary
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Everaert, M. (2004) The unaccusativity puzzle. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3):355–87. Available at: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & McLean, J. F. (2005) Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(3):468–81. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.468 Google ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Walter de Gruyter/Foris/Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., Taranto, G. Shapiro, L. P. & Swinney, D. (2008) The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 39(3):355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. & Thompson, C. K. (2011) Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eye tracking study. Aphasiology 25(6–7):813–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar