Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T08:29:00.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of action in verbal communication and shared reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2013

Gerald Echterhoff*
Affiliation:
Social Psychology Group, Department of Psychology, University of Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany. g.echterhoff@uni-muenster.dehttp://geraldechterhoff.com

Abstract

In examining the utility of the action view advanced in the Pickering & Garrod (P&G) target article, I first consider its contribution to the analysis of language vis-à-vis earlier language-as-action approaches. Second, I assess the relation between coordinated joint action, which serves as a blueprint for dialogue coordination, and the experience of shared reality, a key concomitant and product of interpersonal communication.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22:139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., Kopietz, R. & Groll, S. (2008) How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137:321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. & Levine, J. M. (2009) Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others' inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:496521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L., pp. 4158. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1981) The “communication game”: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In: Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 1, ed. Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P. & Zanna, M. P., pp. 343–92. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. M. (2002) Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1973) The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. New Literary History 5:91–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar