Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T04:06:00.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictive coding? Yes, but from what source?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2013

Gregory Hickok
Gregory Hickok*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. gshickok@uci.edu http://alns.ss.uci.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is little doubt that predictive coding is an important mechanism in language processing–indeed, in information processing generally. However, it is less clear whether the action system is the source of such predictions during perception. Here I summarize the computational problem with motor prediction for perceptual processes and argue instead for a dual-stream model of predictive coding.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Catmur, C., Walsh, V. & Heyes, C. (2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Current Biology 17(17):1527–31.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Fodor, J. D. (1985) How can grammars help parsers? In: Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. Dowty, D. R., Karttunen, L. & Zwicky, A. M., pp. 94–128. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. & Flores d'Arcais, G. (1989) Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28:331–44.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J. & Kiebel, S. J. (2010) Action and behavior: A free-energy formulation. Biological Cybernetics 102(3):227–60.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. & Hickok, G. (1993) Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 8:147–61.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2010) Where do mirror neurons come from? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34(4):575–83.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2009a) Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(7):1229–43. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21189.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2012a) Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(2):135–45.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. (2012b) The cortical organization of speech processing: Feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual-stream model. Journal of Communication Disorders 45:393–402.Google Scholar
Hickok, G., Houde, J. & Rong, F. (2011) Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 69(3):407–22. DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.019.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(5):393–402.Google Scholar
Kawato, M. (1999) Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion of Neurobiology 9(6):718–27.Google Scholar
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. & Scott, S. K. (2009) Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 12(6):718–24. DOI:10.1038/nn.2331.Google Scholar
Sams, M., Möttönen, R. & Sihvonen, T. (2005) Seeing and hearing others and oneself talk. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 23(2–3):429–35.Google Scholar
Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. (2010) Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:89–108.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. & Halle, M. (1967) Remarks on the analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In: Models for the perception of speech and visual form, ed. Walthen-Dunn, W., pp. 88–102. MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W. & Poeppel, D. (2005) Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(4):1181–86.Google Scholar
Venezia, J. H., Saberi, K., Chubb, C. & Hickok, G. (2012) Response bias modulates the speech motor system during syllable discrimination. Frontiers in Psychology 3. article 157, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00157.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. M. & Iacoboni, M. (2006) Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Neuroimage 33(1):316–25.Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M. I. (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269(5232):1880–82.Google Scholar