Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-vmftn Total loading time: 2.169 Render date: 2023-02-01T03:31:03.665Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2013

Christine Howes
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. c.howes@qmul.ac.ukhttp://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/ph@eecs.qmul.ac.ukarash@eecs.qmul.ac.ukjulian.hough@eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Patrick G. T. Healey
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. c.howes@qmul.ac.ukhttp://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/ph@eecs.qmul.ac.ukarash@eecs.qmul.ac.ukjulian.hough@eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Arash Eshghi
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. c.howes@qmul.ac.ukhttp://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/ph@eecs.qmul.ac.ukarash@eecs.qmul.ac.ukjulian.hough@eecs.qmul.ac.uk
Julian Hough
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. c.howes@qmul.ac.ukhttp://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~chrizba/ph@eecs.qmul.ac.ukarash@eecs.qmul.ac.ukjulian.hough@eecs.qmul.ac.uk

Abstract

We present empirical evidence from dialogue that challenges some of the key assumptions in the Pickering & Garrod (P&G) model of speaker-hearer coordination in dialogue. The P&G model also invokes an unnecessarily complex set of mechanisms. We show that a computational implementation, currently in development and based on a simpler model, can account for more of this type of dialogue data.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goodwin, C. (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In: Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, ed. Psathas, G., 97121. Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M. & Howes, C. (2010) Structural divergence in dialogue. Proceedings of 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse.Google Scholar
Hough, J. (2011) Incremental semantics driven natural language generation with self-repairing capability. Proceedings of RANLP 2011 Student Conference, September 2011, Hissar, Bulgaria, 7984.Google Scholar
Howes, C., Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M. & Eshghi, A. (2012) Finishing each other's… Responding to incomplete contributions in dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. August 2012, Sapporo, Japan, 479–85.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3):441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(3): 105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purver, M., Cann, R. & Kempson, R. (2006) Grammars as parsers: The dialogue challenge. Research in Language and Computation 4:289326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purver, M., Eshghi, A. & Hough, J. (2011) Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS). January 2011, Oxford, UK, 365–69.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skantze, G. & Hjalmarsson, A. (2010) Towards incremental speech generation in dialogue systems. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 18.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *