Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Coerced coordination, not cooperation

  • Montserrat Soler (a1) and Hillary L. Lenfesty (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are large-group cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility, resulting in “mutually beneficial exchanges” for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are, instead, successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anderson K. G. (2006) How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Current Anthropology 47:513–20.
Arnqvist G. (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361(1466):375–86.
Atran S. (2003) Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science 299(5612):1534–39.
Bastian B., Jetten J. & Ferris L. J. (2014) Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science 25:2079–85.
Cohn N. (2011) The pursuit of the millennium: Revolutionary millenarians and mystical anarchists of the Middle Ages. Random House.
David A. R. (1997) The pyramid builders of ancient Egypt: A modern investigation of Pharaoh's workforce. Routledge.
Fischer R., Callander R., Reddish P. & Bulbulia J. (2013) How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature 24(2):115–25.
Gabriel R. (2006) Soldier's lives through history: The ancient world. Greenwood Press.
Guilford T. & Dawkins M. S. (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42(1):114.
Guterman M., Mehta P. & Gibbs M. (2007) Menstrual taboos among major religions. The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics 5(2).
Irons W. (2001) Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In: Evolution and the capacity for commitment, ed. Nesse R., pp. 292309. Russell Sage Foundation.
Luther M. (1517/1915) Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the power and efficacy of indulgences. In: Works of Martin Luther, vol. 1. ed. & trans. Spaeth A., Reed L. D., Jacobs H. E., Jacobs C. M., Steinhaeuser A. T. W., Neve J. L., Schindel J. J., Schmauk T. E., Steimle A., Lambert W. A. , pp. 2938. A. J. Holman Company. (Original work published 1517). Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/274/pg274.html.
Nettle D. & Pollet T. V. (2008) Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist 172(5):658–66.
Ryan M. J. & Rand A. S. (1993) Sexual selection and signal evolution: The ghost of biases past. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 340(1292):187–95.
Soler M. (2012) Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: Evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(4):346–56.
Soler M., Batiste F. & Cronk L. (2014) In the eye (and ears) of the beholder: Receiver psychology and human signal design. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 23(4):136–45.
Sosis R. (2003) Why aren't we all Hutterites? Human Nature 14(2):91127.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 42 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 196 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.