Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T22:07:39.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authoritarian and benevolent god representations and the two sides of prosociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Kathryn A. Johnson  and
Adam B. Cohen
Kathryn A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287. kathryn.a.johnson@asu.edu http://psychology-dev.clas.asu.edu/faculty/kathryn-johnson adamcohen@asu.edu https://psychology.clas.asu.edu/faculty/adam-cohen
Adam B. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287. kathryn.a.johnson@asu.edu http://psychology-dev.clas.asu.edu/faculty/kathryn-johnson adamcohen@asu.edu https://psychology.clas.asu.edu/faculty/adam-cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Big Gods model focuses on belief in an authoritarian God as a psychological mechanism that inhibits antisocial behavior and facilitates the formation of tight, cohesive groups. Recent empirical evidence suggests, however, that belief in a benevolent God is more likely to inspire helping and inclusivity. Both kinds of beliefs are necessary to explain the development of large-scale societies.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e16
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aten, J. D., Moore, M., Denney, R. M., Bayne, T., Stagg, A., Owens, S., Daniels, S., Boswell, S., Schenck, J., Adams, J. & Jones, C. (2008) God images following Hurricane Katrina in south Mississippi: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology and Theology 36:249–57.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., Ridge, R. D., Das, E., Key, C. W. & Busath, G. L. (2007) When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science 18:204–207.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998) What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2:300–19.Google Scholar
Froese, P. & Bader, C. (2010) America's four gods: What we say about God – and what that says about us. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janoff-Bulman, R. & Carnes, N. C. (2013) Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 17:219–36.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Cohen, A. B., Okun, M. A., & Liu, Y. (in press) God is watching over you vs. God is watching you: The influence of benevolent and authoritarian God representations on secular volunteerism. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Li, Y. J. & Cohen, A. B. (2015a) Fundamental motives and the varieties of religious experience. Religion, Brain, and Behavior 5:197–231.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Li, Y. J., Cohen, A. B. & Okun, M. A. (2013) Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent God-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 5:15–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. A., Okun, M. A., & Cohen, A. B. (2015c). The mind of the Lord: Measuring authoritarian and benevolent God-concepts. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 7:227–38.Google Scholar
McCann, S. J. (1999) Threatening times and fluctuations in American church memberships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25:325–36.Google Scholar
Sales, S. M. (1972) Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23:420–28.Google Scholar