Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-m2b9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T20:47:03.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognition and valence as chicken and egg: Motivational force evolved alongside cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2025

George Ainslie Open the ORCID record for George Ainslie [Opens in a new window]
George Ainslie*
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Coatesville, Pennsylvania, USA ga@picoeconomics.org www.picoeconomics.org
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The convergent evolution described for invertebrate cognition might have occurred in similar fashion with motivational valence, the other pillar of response selection. Primitive examples of such properties as liking (versus wanting), dependence on appetite, and especially attenuation with delay might provide clues to a longstanding puzzle: how incentive salience, classical conditioning, emotional arousal, and mental behavior in general are apparently all entwined with valence.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e79
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ainslie, G. (2005). Précis of Breakdown of Will . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 635–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainslie, G. (2017). De gustibus disputare: Hyperbolic delay discounting integrates five approaches to choice. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(2), 166–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, G. (2023). Behavioral construction of the future. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 37(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainslie, G. & Monterosso, J. (2003). Building blocks of self-control: Increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L.F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L.F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion:an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12,1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, K. C. (2018). Evolving concepts of emotion and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brill, M. F., Meyer, A., & Rössler, W. (2015). It takes two—coincidence coding within the dual olfactory pathway of the honeybee. Frontiers in Physiology, 6, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brucks, D., Petelle, M., Baldoni, C., Krasheninnikova, A., Rovegno, E., & von Bayern, A. M. (2022). Intra-and interspecific variation in self-control capacities of parrots in a delay of gratification task. Animal Cognition, 25(2), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A. (2012). The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(1), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donahoe, J. W. (2021). Biological behaviorism. Contemporary behaviorisms in debate (pp. 113–135). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahoe, J. W., Burgos, J. E., & Palmer, D. C. (1993). A selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, G. B., & Jackson, R. R. (1994). The role of experience in the development of predatory behaviour in Phidippus regius, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Florida. New Zealand Journal of Zoolog, 21(3), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Macaux, E. W. (2005). Temporal discounting when the choice is between two delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1121–1133.Google ScholarPubMed
Leadbeater, E., & Dawson, E. H. (2017). A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms. Proceddings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 114, 7838–7845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, P., & Kuchling, F. (2021). Valuing what happens: a biogenic approach to valence and (potentially) affect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1820), 20190752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mather, J. A., & Dickel, L. (2017). Cephalopod complex cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 131–137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N. (1969) Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science, 163, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R., Boeckle, M., Jelbert, S. A., Frohnwieser, A., Wascher, C. A., & Clayton, N. S. (2019). Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 10(6), e1504.Google ScholarPubMed
Morris, L. S., Grehl, M. M., Rutter, S. B., Mehta, M., & Westwater, M. L. (2022). On what motivates us: a detailed review of intrinsic v. extrinsic motivation. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1801–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, N. J. & Call, J. (2006). Apes save tools for future use. Science, 312, 1038–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osvath, M., & Martin-Ordas, G. (2014). The future of future-oriented cognition in non-humans: theory and the empirical case of the great apes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1655), 20130486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pear, J.& Eldridge, G. D. (1984). The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, C. J., & Barron, A. B. (2013). Neural mechanisms of reward in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 58(1), 543–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietri, E. S., Fazio, R. H., & Shook, N. J. (2013) Weighting positive versus negative: The fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 81, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzagalli, D. A. (2022). Toward a better understanding of the mechanisms and pathophysiology of anhedonia: are we ready for translation? American Journal of Psychiatry 179(7), 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raby, C. R., Alexis, D. M., Clayton, N. S., & Dickinson, A. (2007) Planning for the future by western scrubjays. Nature, 445(7130), 919–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, N. J., Hochner, B., & Kuba, M. J. (2016) Pull or push? Octopuses solve a puzzle problem. PLOS ONE, 10, e0152048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1259–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas-Morellón, L., Palacios-Huerta, I., & Call, J. (2024). Dynamic inconsistency in great apes. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 18130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartre, J.-P. (1939/1948). The emotions: Sketch of a theory (B. Frechtman, trans.). Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schwaerzel, M., Monastirioti, M., Scholz, H., Friggi-Grelin, F., Birman, S, & Heisenberg, M. (2003). Dopamine and octopamine differentiate between aversive and appetitive olfactory memories in Drosophila . Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 10495–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenger, M. A., & Bagchi, B. K. (1961). Studies of autonomic functions in practitioners of yoga in India. Behavioral Science, 6(4), 312–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed