Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-pffzl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-07T14:38:14.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complex cognition in context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2025

Anna Loi ,
Aditya Ponkshe ,
Miguel Segundo-Ortin  and
Vicente Raja Open the ORCID record for Vicente Raja [Opens in a new window]
Anna Loi
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain anna.finke@um.es MINT Lab, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain ponkshe.aditya@gmail.com
Aditya Ponkshe
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain anna.finke@um.es MINT Lab, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain ponkshe.aditya@gmail.com
Miguel Segundo-Ortin
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain anna.finke@um.es MINT Lab, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain ponkshe.aditya@gmail.com
Vicente Raja*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain anna.finke@um.es MINT Lab, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain ponkshe.aditya@gmail.com Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain miguel.segundo@um.es vicente.raja@um.es
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coombs and Trestman provide an integrative, embodied framework for the evolution of complex cognition. However, they overlook the critical role of ecological and environmental contexts in such evolution. Our commentary highlights its anthropocentric biases and emphasizes the need for species-specific approaches that account for diverse sensory modalities, ecologies, and social environments while prioritizing organism-specific challenges and ecological niches.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e88
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: How body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. (2016). Why brains are not computers, why behaviorism is not satanism, and why dolphins are not aquatic apes. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-015-0047-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, L. A., Sayialel, K. N., Njiraini, N. W., Poole, J. H., Moss, C. J., & Byrne, R. W. (2008). African elephants have expectations about the locations of out-of-sight family members. Biology Letters, 4(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0529 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekoff, M., Allen, C., & Burghardt, G. M. (Eds.). (2002). The mirror test. In The cognitive animal (pp. 325–334). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1885.003.0046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2017). Theoretical considerations on cognitive niche construction. Synthese, 194(12), 4757–4779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1165-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitzer, A., & Huebner, B. (2012). Tool use as situated cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002147 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brebner, J. S., Loconsole, M., Hanley, D., & Vasas, V. (2024). Through an animal’s eye: The implications of diverse sensory systems in scientific experimentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2027), 20240022. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0022 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, C. (2013). Morgan’s Canon, meet Hume’s Dictum: Avoiding anthropofabulation in cross-species comparisons. Biology & Philosophy, 28(5), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9376-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, E. M., Nowicki, S., & Johnsen, S. (2019). Von Uexküll Revisited: Addressing Human Biases in the Study of Animal Perception. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(6), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, R., Modak, S., & Balakrishnan, R. (2020). Baffling: A condition-dependent alternative mate attraction strategy using self-made tools in tree crickets. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1941), 20202229. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2229 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. xiv, 332). Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. (1980). The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae: Prey capture, handling and utilization. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 49(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.2307/4279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, A. (2017). Smelling themselves: Dogs investigate their own odours longer when modified in an “olfactory mirror” test. Behavioural Processes, 143, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japyassú, H. F., & Laland, K. N. (2017). Extended spider cognition. Animal Cognition, 20(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1069-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K., Matthews, B., & Feldman, M. W. (2016). An introduction to niche construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology, 30(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9821-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laubichler, M. D., & Renn, J. (2015). Extended evolution: A conceptual framework for integrating regulatory networks and niche construction. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 324(7), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22631 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merriam Webster. (2025). Definition of TOOL. In Merriam Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tool Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocheville, A. (2015). The ecological niche: History and recent controversies. In Heams, T., Huneman, P., Lecointre, G. , & Silberstein, M. (Eds.). Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences (pp. 547–586). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9014-7_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tariel-Adam, J., Toledo, J. G., O’Brien, C. E., Floeter, S. R., & Brown, C. (2025). Tool use by New World Halichoeres wrasses. Coral Reefs, 44, 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-025-02633-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, C. D. L. (with Udell, M. A. R.). (2020). Animal cognition: Evolution, behavior and cognition (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.Google Scholar
Yong, E. (2023). An immense world: How animal senses reveal the hidden realms around us. Vintage.Google Scholar