N. Ali , N. Chater & M. Oaksford (2011) The mental representation of causal conditional reasoning: Mental models or causal models. Cognition 119:403–18.
J. R. Anderson (1991a) Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:471–517.
N. Chater & M. Oaksford (1990) Autonomy, implementation and cognitive architecture: A reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn. Cognition 34:93–107.
N. Chater , M. Oaksford , R. Nakisa & M. Redington (2003) Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90:63–86.
N. Chater & P. Vitányi (2007) “Ideal learning” of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51:135–63.
A. C. Courville , N. D. Daw & D. S. Touretzky (2006) Bayesian theories of conditioning in a changing world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:294–300.
J. A. Feldman & D. H. Ballard (1982) Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science 6:205–54.
S. Foraker , T. Regier , N. Khetarpal , A. Perfors & J. B. Tenenbaum (2009) Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one. Cognitive Science 33:287–300.
N. D. Goodman , J. B. Tenenbaum , J. Feldman & T. L. Griffiths (2008b) A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science 32(1):108–54.
N. D. Goodman , T. D. Ullman & J. B. Tenenbaum (2011) Learning a theory of causality. Psychological Review 118:110–19.
A. Gopnik , C. Glymour , D. Sobel , L. Schulz , T. Kushnir & D. Danks (2004) A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review 111(1):3–32.
T. L. Griffiths , N. Chater , C. Kemp , A. Perfors & J. Tenenbaum (2010) Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(8):357–64.
T. L. Griffiths & J. B. Tenenbaum (2009) Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review 116:661–716.
A. Hsu & N. Chater (2010) The logical problem of language acquisition: A probabilistic perspective. Cognitive Science 34:972–1016.
C. Kemp & J. B. Tenenbaum (2008) The discovery of structural form. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105:10687–692.
C. Kemp & J. B. Tenenbaum (2009) Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning. Psychological Review 116:20–58.
C. Kemp , N. D. Goodman & J. B. Tenenbaum (2010a) Learning to learn causal relations. Cognitive Science 34:1185–1243.
C. Kemp , J. B. Tenenbaum , S. Niyogi & T. L. Griffiths (2010b) A probabilistic model of theory formation. Cognition 114(2):165–96.
D. Marr (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman.
J. L. McClelland (2010) Emergence in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science 2:751–70.
R. M. Neal (1992) Connectionist learning of belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 56:71–113.
M. Oaksford & N. Chater (1994) A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review 101:608–31.
M. Oaksford & N. Chater (2003) Optimal data selection: Revision, review, and reevaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10:289–318.
J. Pearl (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann.
A. Perfors , J. B. Tenenbaum & T. Regier (2011) The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition 118:306–38.
A. Perfors , J. Tenenbaum & E. Wonnacott (2010) Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language 37:607–42.
B. Rehder & R. Burnett (2005) Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 50:264–314.
A. N. Sanborn , T. L. Griffiths & D. J. Navarro (2010a) Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review 117:1144–67.
J. B. Tenenbaum , C. Kemp , T. L. Griffiths & N. D. Goodman (2011) How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331(6022):1279–85.
E. Vul , D. Hanus & N. Kanwisher (2009b) Attention as inference: Selection is probabilistic, responses are all-or-none samples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138:546–60.
A. Yuille & D. Kersten (2006) Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:301–308.