Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Memes and the evolution of religion: We need memetics, too

  • Susan Blackmore (a1)
Abstract

In their analysis, Norenzayan et al. completely ignore memetics, which, unlike other theories, treats memes as replicators and looks to memetic as well as genetic advantage. Now that memes are evolving ever faster, genetic advantage is less relevant. So when religious and secular values are at odds, we need a memetic analysis to understand what is going on.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Blackmore, S. J. (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press (new edition with additional material, 1989).
Dawkins, R. (1993) Viruses of the mind. In: Dennett and his critics: Demystifying mind, ed. Dahlbohm, B., pp. 1327. Blackwell.
Dennett, D. C. (2006) Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Allen Lane.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 253 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 803 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.