Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:14:11.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictability or controllability: Which matters more for the BCD?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Jeffrey Gassen
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129. j.gassen@tcu.edu h.k.bradshaw@tcu.edu r.proffittleyva@tcu.edu s.e.hill@tcu.edu https://www.sarahehill.com
Hannah K. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129. j.gassen@tcu.edu h.k.bradshaw@tcu.edu r.proffittleyva@tcu.edu s.e.hill@tcu.edu https://www.sarahehill.com
Randi Proffitt Leyva
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129. j.gassen@tcu.edu h.k.bradshaw@tcu.edu r.proffittleyva@tcu.edu s.e.hill@tcu.edu https://www.sarahehill.com
Sarah E. Hill
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129. j.gassen@tcu.edu h.k.bradshaw@tcu.edu r.proffittleyva@tcu.edu s.e.hill@tcu.edu https://www.sarahehill.com

Abstract

Pepper & Nettle's theory of the behavioral constellation of deprivation (BCD) would benefit from teasing apart the conceptually distinct – although related – constructs of predictability and control. Our commentary draws from prior research conducted in the learning domain to demonstrate that predictability moderates the effects of control and independently exerts a powerful influence on outcomes relevant to the BCD.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable