Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T14:12:58.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public health interventions can increase objective and perceived control by supporting people to enact the choices they want to make

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Jean Adams*
Affiliation:
Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. jma79@medschl.cam.ac.uk http://www.cedar.iph.cam.ac.uk/people/leads/jean-adams/

Abstract

“Low-agency” public health interventions do not rely on individuals using their personal resources to benefit. These help people enact the choices they wish to make and are likely to increase objective and perceived control. Lower-agency interventions have been criticised as constraining individual choice. Pepper & Nettle show that this is unlikely to be the case.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable