This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
J. Acha & M. Perea (2010) Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology 57:245–51.
J. S. Adelman , S. J. Marquis & M. G. Sabatos-DeVito (2011) Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science 21:1799–801.
S. Bentin & R. Frost (1987) Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory and Cognition 15:13–23.
S. Bentin , R. Hammer & S. Cahan (1991) The effects of aging and first grade schooling on the development of phonological awareness. American Psychological Science 2:271–74.
P. Bertelson , J. Morais , J. Alegria & A. Content (1985) Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read. Nature 313:73–74.
R. Bertram & J. Hyönä (2003) The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 48:615–34.
W. Bialek , I. Nemenman & N. Tishby (2001) Predictability, complexity, and learning. Neural Computation 13:2409–63.
S. R. Borgwaldt , F. M. Hellwig & A. M. B. De Groot (2005) Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 18:211–29.
J. S. Bowers & Y. Michita (1998) An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji–Hiragana priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5:259–64.
M. Brysbaert (2001) Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all. Memory and Cognition 29:765–73.
M. Coltheart , K. Rastle , C. Perry , R. Langdon & J. Ziegler (2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108:204–56.
C. J. Davis (2010) The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 117:713–58.
S. Dehaene , L. Cohen , M. Sigman & F. Vinckier (2005) The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:335–41.
A. Deutsch , R. Frost , S. Peleg , A. Pollatsek & K. Rayner (2003) Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10(2):415–22.
A. Deutsch , R. Frost , A. Pollatsek & K. Rayner (2000) Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes 15:487–506.
A. Deutsch & K. Rayner (1999) Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes 14:393–421.
K. Diependaele , J. Ziegler & J. Grainger (2010) Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22:764–78.
J. A. Duñabeitia , M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2007) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition 105(3):691–703.
A. D. Endress & J. Mehler (2009) The surprising power of statistical learning: When fragment knowledge leads to false memories of unheard words. Journal of Memory and Language 60:351–67.
J. Evans , J. Saffran & K. Robe-Torres (2009) Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52:321–36.
L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (1992) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 45:353–72.
K. I. Forster & C. Davis (1991) The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language 30:1–25.
K. I. Forster , C. Davis , C. Schocknecht & R. Carter (1987) Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 39:211–51.
N. Friedmann , D. Dotan & E. Rahamim (2010) Is the visual analyzer orthographic-specific? Reading words and numbers in letter position dyslexia. Cortex 46:982–1004.
N. Friedmann & A. Gvion (2001) Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18:673–96.
N. Friedmann & A. Gvion (2005) Letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia. Behavioural Neurology 16:145–58.
R. Frost (1998) Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123(1):71–99.
R. Frost (2006) Becoming literate in Hebrew: The grain-size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science 9:439–40.
R. Frost , M. Ahissar , R. Gottesman & S. Tayeb (2003) Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language 48:346–78.
R. Frost , A. Deutsch & K. I. Forster (2000a) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory, and Cognition 26:751–65.
R. Frost , A. Deutsch , O. Gilboa , M. Tannenbaum & W. Marslen-Wilson (2000b) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition 28:1277–88.
R. Frost & O. Yogev (2001) Orthographic and phonological computation in visual word recognition: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8:524–30.
P. Gomez , R. Ratcliff & M. Perea (2008) The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 115:577–601.
U. Goswami (2000) Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia 6:133–51.
J. Grainger (2008) Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:1–35.
J. Grainger & L. Ferrand (1994) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language 33:218–33.
J. Grainger & C. Whitney (2004) Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:58–59.
J. Grainger & J. Ziegler (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054. (Web journal, online publication).
N. Gronau & R. Frost (1997) Prelexical phonologic computation in a deep orthography: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4:107–112.
C. Guerrera & K. I. Forster (2008) Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:117–42.
M. W. Harm & M. S. Seidenberg (1999) Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review 106:491–528.
C. H. Hsu , J. L. Tsai , C. Y. Lee & O. J. Tzeng (2009) Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language 108:56–66.
G. W. Humphreys , L. J. Evett & P. T. Quinlan (1990) Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 22:517–60.
Z. R. Hunter & M. Brysbaert (2008) Theoretical analysis of interhemispheric transfer costs in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:165–82.
K. Inagaki , G. Hatano & T. Otake (2000) The effect of Kana literacy acquisition on the speech segmentation unit used by Japanese young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75:70–91.
L. Katz & R. Frost (1992) The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning: Advances in Psychology, vol. 94, ed. R. Frost & L. Katz, pp. 67–84. Elsevier/North-Holland.
B. Kessler & R. Treiman (1997) Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language 37:295–311.
H. Kubozono (2006) The phonetic and phonological organization of speech in Japanese. In: The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, ed. M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka & Y. Shirai, pp. 191–200. Cambridge University Press.
V. Kuperman , R. Bertram & R. H. Baayen (2008) Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:1089–132.
C. H. Lee & M. Taft (2009) Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4):530–42. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002.
C. H. Lee & M. Taft (2011) Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18(1):129–34. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y.
J. C. Marshall & F. Newcombe (1973) Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2:179–99.
I. G. Mattingly (1992) Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, ed. R. Frost & L. Katz, pp. 11–26. Elsevier/North-Holland.
J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 88:375–407.
E. L. Newport & R. N. Aslin (2004) Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48:127–62.
D. Norris , S. Kinoshita & M. van Casteren (2010) A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language 62:254–71.
M. Perea , R. Abu Mallouh , & M. Carreiras (2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17(3):375–80.
M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006a) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59:1600–13.
M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006b) Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology 53:308–15.
M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2006c) Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13:418–22.
M. Perea & M. Carreiras (2008) Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes 23:69–92.
M. Perea & S. J. Lupker (2004) Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 51:231–46.
M. Perea & E. Perez (2009) Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in Katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes 24:67–88.
M. Perea & E. Rosa (2000a) Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a short stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7:668–77.
F. Peressotti & J. Grainger (1999) The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics 61:691–706.
P. Perruchet & S. Pacton (2006) Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:233–38.
S. T. Piantadosi , H. Tily & E. Gibson (2011) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:3526–29.
D. C. Plaut , J. L. McClelland , M. S. Seidenberg & K. Patterson (1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103:56–115.
K. Rastle & M. H. Davis (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 23:942–71.
K. Rastle , M. H. Davis & B. New (2004) The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11:1090–98.
K. Rayner (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124:372–422.
K. Rayner (2009) The thirty fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:1457–506.
K. Rayner , S. J. White , R. L. Johnson & S. P. Liversedge (2006) Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science 17:192–93.
D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (1982) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 89:60–94.
J. R. Saffran , R. N. Aslin & E. L. Newport (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28.
S. Schoonbaert & J. Grainger (2004) Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 19:333–67.
M. S. Seidenberg & J. L. McClelland (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96:523–68.
P. H. K. Seymour , M. Aro & J. M. Erskine (2003) Foundation of literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94:143–74.
T. Shallice & E. K. Warrington (1977) The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 15:31–41.
D. L. Share (2008a) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin 134(4):584–615.
E. Shetreet & N. Friedmann (2011) Induced letter migrations between words and what they reveal about the orthographic-visual analyzer. Neuropsychologia 49:339–51.
R. Shillcock , T. M. Ellison & P. Monaghan (2000) Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review 107:824–51.
R. Treiman , J. Mullennix , R. Bijeljac-Babic & E. D. Richmond-Welty (1995) The special role of rimes in the description use and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124:107–36.
H. Velan & R. Frost (2007) Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14(5):913–18.
H. Velan & R. Frost (2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language 61:285–320.
H. Velan & R. Frost (2011) Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition 118:141–56.
F. Wang , Y. Tsai & W. S.-Y. Wang (2009) Chinese literacy. In: Cambridge handbook on literacy, ed. D. Olson & N. Torrance, pp. 386–417. Cambridge University Press.
C. Whitney (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8(2):221–43.
C. Whitney (2008) Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(6):824–65.
C. Whitney & P. Cornelissen (2005) Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 28(3):274–301.
C. Whitney & P. Cornelissen (2008) SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(1):143–64. doi:10.1080/01690960701579771.
T. N. Wydell & T. Kondo (2003) Phonological deficit and the reliance on orthographic approximation for reading: A follow-up study on an English–Japanese bilingual with monolingual dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 26:33–48.
J. Yamada & A. Banks (1994) Evidence for and characteristics of dyslexia among Japanese children. Annals of Dyslexia 44:105–19.
J. C. Ziegler , D. Bertrand , D. Tóth , V. Csépe , A. Reis , L. Faísca , N. Saine , H. Lyytinen , A. Vaessen & L. Blomert (2010) Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science 21(4):551–59.
J. C. Ziegler & U. Goswami (2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131:3–29.