Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T18:19:40.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual word recognition models should also be constrained by knowledge about the visual system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Pablo Gomez  and
Sarah Silins
Pablo Gomez
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614. pgomez1@depaul.edu http://condor.depaul.edu/~pgomez1/WNPL
Sarah Silins
Affiliation:
Law School, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611. ssilins@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Frost's article advocates for universal models of reading and critiques recent models that concentrate in what has been described as “cracking the orthographic code.” Although the challenge to develop models that can account for word recognition beyond Indo-European languages is welcomed, we argue that reading models should also be constrained by general principles of visual processing and object recognition.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R. & Maddox, W. T. (1996) A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review 103:165–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. & Perea, M. (2008) The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 115:577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D. (1996) The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review 103:603–49.Google Scholar
Mamassian, P., Landy, M. S. & Maloney, L. T. (2002) Bayesian modelling of visual perception. In: Probabilistic models of the brain: Perception and neural function, ed. Rao, R., Olshausen, B. & Lewicki, M., pp. 13–36. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norris, D. & Kinoshita, S. (in press) Reading through a noisy channel: Why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review.Google Scholar
Velan, H. & Frost, R. (2011) Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition 118:141–56.Google Scholar