Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in the reticulorumen of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces)

  • Marcus Clauss (a1), Isabel Lechner (a1), Perry Barboza (a2), William Collins (a3), Theo A. Tervoort (a4), Karl-Heinz Südekum (a5), Daryl Codron (a1) and Jürgen Hummel (a5)...
Abstract

Particle passage from the reticulorumen (RR) depends on particle density and size. Forage particle density and size are related and change over time in the RR. Particle density mainly influences sorting in the reticulum, whereas particle size influences particle retention in the fibre mat of stratified rumen contents (‘filter-bed’ effect). We investigated these effects independently, by inserting plastic particles of different sizes (1, 10 and 20 mm) and densities (1·03, 1·20 and 1·44 mg/ml) in the RR of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus) as a pilot study, and of muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus; n 4) and moose (Alces alces; n 2) both fed two diets (browse and grass). Faeces were analysed for plastic residues for 13 d after dosing to calculate mean retention times (MRT). The results confirmed previous findings of differences in absolute MRT between species. Comparing muskoxen with moose, there was no difference in the effect of particle density on the MRT between species but particle size had a more pronounced effect on the MRT in muskoxen than in moose. This indicated a stronger ‘filter-bed effect’ in muskoxen, in accord with the reports of stratified RR contents in this species v. the absence of RR content stratification in moose. Low-density particles were retained longer in both species fed on grass diets, indicating a contribution of forage type to the ‘filter-bed effect’. The results indicate that retention based on particle size may differ between ruminant species, depending on the presence of a fibre mat in the RR, whereas the density-dependent mechanism of sedimentation in the RR is rather constant across species.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in the reticulorumen of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in the reticulorumen of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of size and density on the mean retention time of particles in the reticulorumen of cattle (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and moose (Alces alces)
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Dr M. Clauss, email mclauss@vetclinics.uzh.ch
References
Hide All
1Schwarm, A, Ortmann, S, Wolf, C, et al. (2008) Excretion patterns of fluids and particle passage markers of different size in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis): two functionally different foregut fermenters. Comp Biochem Physiol A 150, 3239.
2Schwarm, A, Ortmann, S, Wolf, C, et al. (2009) Passage marker excretion in red kangaroo (Macropus rufus), collared peccary (Pecari tajacu) and colobine monkeys (Colobus angolensis, C. polykomos, Trachypithecus johnii). J Exp Zool A 311, 647661.
3Fritz, J, Hummel, J, Kienzle, E, et al. (2009) Comparative chewing efficiency in mammalian herbivores. Oikos 118, 16231632.
4Schwarm, A, Ortmann, S, Wolf, C, et al. (2009) More efficient mastication allows increasing intake without compromising digestibility or necessitating a larger gut: comparative feeding trials in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis). Comp Biochem Physiol A 152, 504512.
5Clauss, M, Hume, ID & Hummel, J (2010) Evolutionary adaptations of ruminants and their potential relevance for modern production systems. Animal 4, 979992.
6Lechner-Doll, M, Kaske, M & Engelhardt, Wv (1991) Factors affecting the mean retention time of particles in the forestomach of ruminants and camelids. In Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 455482 [Tsuda, T, Sasaki, Y and Kawashima, R, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7Hristov, AN, Ahvenjärvi, S, McAllister, TA, et al. (2003) Composition and digestive tract retention time of ruminal particles with functional specific gravity greater or less than 1.02. J Anim Sci 81, 26392648.
8Allen, MS (1996) Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants. J Anim Sci 74, 30633075.
9Baumont, R & Deswysen, AG (1991) Mélange et propulsion du contenu du réticulo-rumen (Mixing and propulsion of the contents of the reticulo-rumen). Reprod Nutr Dev 31, 335359.
10Sutherland, TM (1988) Particle separation in the forestomach of sheep. In Aspects of Digestive Physiology in Ruminants, pp. 4373 [Dobson, A and Dobson, MJ, editors]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11Clauss, M, Fritz, J, Bayer, D, et al. (2009) Physical characteristics of rumen contents in two small ruminants of different feeding type, the mouflon (Ovis ammon musimon) and the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Zoology 112, 195205.
12Clauss, M, Fritz, J, Bayer, D, et al. (2009) Physical characteristics of rumen contents in four large ruminants of different feeding type, the addax (Addax nasomaculatus), bison (Bison bison), red deer (Cervus elaphus) and moose (Alces alces). Comp Biochem Physiol A 152, 398406.
13Hummel, J, Südekum, K-H, Bayer, D, et al. (2009) Physical characteristics of reticuloruminal contents of cattle in relation to forage type and time after feeding. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 93, 209220.
14Faichney, GJ (1986) The kinetics of particulate matter in the rumen. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, [Milligan, LP, Grovum, WL and Dobson, A, editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15Kennedy, PM (2006) Particle dynamics. In Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, [Dijkstra, J, Forbes, JM and France, J, editors]. Wellingford: CAB International.
16Bernard, L, Chaise, JP, Baumont, R, et al. (2000) The effect of physical form of orchardgrass hay on the passage of particulate matter through the rumen of sheep. J Anim Sci 78, 13381354.
17Pasha, TN, Prigge, EC, Russell, RW, et al. (1994) Influence of moisture content of forage diets on intake and digestion by sheep. J Anim Sci 72, 24552463.
18Kaske, M & von Engelhardt, W (1990) The effect of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Br J Nutr 63, 457465.
19Kaske, M, Hatiboglu, S & von Engelhardt, W (1992) The influence of density and size of particles on rumination and passage from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. Br J Nutr 67, 235244.
20Katoh, K, Sato, F, Yamazaki, A, et al. (1988) Passage of indigestible particles of various specific gravities in sheep and goats. Br J Nutr 60, 683687.
21Murphy, MR, Kennedy, PM & Welch, JG (1989) Passage and rumination of inert particles varying in size and specific gravity as determined from analysis of faecal appearance using multicompartment models. Br J Nutr 62, 481492.
22Ehle, FR & Stern, MD (1986) Influence of particle size and density on particulate passage through alimentary tract of Holstein heifers. J Dairy Sci 69, 564568.
23Campling, RC & Freer, M (1962) The effect of specific gravity and size on the mean time of retention of inert particles in the alimentary tract of the cow. Br J Nutr 16, 507518.
24desBordes, CK & Welch, JG (1984) Influence of specific gravity on rumination and passage of indigestible particles. J Anim Sci 59, 470475.
25Stetter Neel, JP, Prigge, EC & Townsend, EC (1995) Influence of moisture content of forage on ruminal functional specific gravity and passage of digesta. J Anim Sci 73, 30943102.
26Kennedy, PM, McSweeney, CS, Ffoulkes, D, et al. (1992) Intake and digestion in swamp buffaloes and cattle. I. The digestion of rice straw (Oryza sativa). J Agric Sci 119, 227242.
27King, KW & Moore, WEC (1957) Density and size as factors affecting passage rate of ingesta in the bovine and human digestive tracts. J Dairy Sci 40, 528536.
28Welch, JG (1982) Rumination, particle size and passage from the rumen. J Anim Sci 54, 885894.
29Prigge, E, Stuthers, B & Jacquemet, N (1990) Influence of forage diets on ruminal particle size, passage of digesta, feed intake and digestibility by steers. J Anim Sci 68, 43524360.
30Prigge, EC, Fox, JT, Jacquemet, NA, et al. (1993) Influence of forage species and diet particle size on the passage of digesta and nylon particles from the reticulorumen of steers. J Anim Sci 71, 27602769.
31Cardinal, JR (1997) Intraruminal devices. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 28, 303322.
32Ghirardi, JJ, Caja, G, Garín, D, et al. (2006) Retention of different sizes of electronic identification boluses in the forestomachs of sheep. J Anim Sci 84, 28652872.
33Clauss, M, Hofmann, RR, Streich, WJ, et al. (2010) Convergence in the macroscopic anatomy of the reticulum in wild ruminant species of different feeding types and a new resulting hypothesis on reticular function. J Zool 281, 2638.
34Lechner, I, Barboza, P, Collins, W, et al. (2010) Differential passage of fluids and different-sized particles in fistulated oxen (Bos primigenius f. taurus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces): rumen particle size discrimination is independent from contents stratification. Comp Biochem Physiol A 155, 211222.
35Clauss, M, Hofmann, RR, Hummel, J, et al. (2006) The macroscopic anatomy of the omasum of free-ranging moose (Alces alces) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) and a comparison of the omasal laminal surface area in 34 ruminant species. J Zool 270, 346358.
36Tschuor, A & Clauss, M (2008) Investigations on the stratification of forestomach contents in ruminants: an ultrasonographic approach. Eur J Wildl Res 54, 627633.
37Clauss, M, Hofmann, RR, Fickel, J, et al. (2009) The intraruminal papillation gradient in wild ruminants of different feeding types: implications for rumen physiology. J Morphol 270, 929942.
38Clauss, M, Adamczewski, J & Hofmann, RR (2010) Surface enlargement in the rumen of free-ranging muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Eur J Wildl Res 56, 181185.
39Lechner, I, Barboza, P, Collins, W, et al. (2009) No ‘bypass’ in adult ruminants: passage of fluid ingested vs. fluid inserted into the rumen in fistulated muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and moose (Alces alces). Comp Biochem Physiol A 154, 151156.
40Thielemans, MF, Francois, E, Bodart, C, et al. (1978) Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc a l'aide des radiolanthanides. Comparaison avec le mouton (Measurement of gastrointestinal transit in pigs using radiolanthanides. Comparison with sheep). Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys 18, 237247.
41Grovum, WL & Williams, VJ (1973) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep: 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. Br J Nutr 30, 313329.
42Kaske, M & Groth, A (1997) Changes in factors affecting the rate of digesta passage through pregnancy and lactation in sheep fed on hay. Reprod Nutr Dev 37, 573588.
43Mambrini, M & Peyraud, JL (1997) Retention time of feed particles and liquids in the stomachs and intestines of dairy cows. Direct measurement and calculation based on fecal collection. Reprod Nutr Dev 37, 427442.
44Wylie, MJ, Ellis, WC, Matis, JH, et al. (2000) The flow of forage particles and solutes through segments of the digestive tracts of cattle. Br J Nutr 83, 295306.
45Siciliano-Jones, J & Murphy, MR (1986) Passage of inert particles varying in length and specific gravity through the postruminal digestive tract of steers. J Dairy Sci 69, 23042311.
46Grovum, WL & Williams, VJ (1973) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 3. Differential rates of passage of water and dry matter from the reticulo-rumen, abomasum and caecum and proximal colon. Br J Nutr 30, 231240.
47StatSoft (Europe) GmbH (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system version 8). Hamburg: StatSoft.
48Hummel, J, Südekum, K-H, Streich, WJ, et al. (2006) Forage fermentation patterns and their implications for herbivore ingesta retention times. Funct Ecol 20, 9891002.
49Clauss, M, Hummel, J & Streich, WJ (2006) The dissociation of the fluid and particle phase in the forestomach as a physiological characteristic of large grazing ruminants: an evaluation of available, comparable ruminant passage data. Eur J Wildl Res 52, 8898.
50Garland, T & Adolph, SC (1994) Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiol Biochem Zool 67, 797828.
51Dardillat, C & Baumont, R (1992) Physical characteristics of reticular content in the bovine and consequences on reticular outflow. Reprod Nutr Dev 32, 2136.
52Evans, EW, Pearce, GR, Burnett, J, et al. (1973) Changes in some physical characteristics of the digesta in the reticulo-rumen of cows fed once daily. Br J Nutr 29, 357376.
53Wattiaux, MA, Satter, LD & Mertens, DR (1992) Effect of microbial fermentation on functional specific gravity of small forage particles. J Anim Sci 70, 12621270.
54Kaske, M & Midasch, A (1997) Effects of experimentally-impaired reticular contractions on digesta passage in sheep. Br J Nutr 78, 97110.
55Balch, CC & Kelly, A (1950) Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 3. The specific gravity of digesta from the reticulo-rumen of cows. Br J Nutr 4, 395398.
56Forwood, JR, Owensby, CE & Towne, G (1985) Particle size changes in rumen of cattle grazing Kansas Flint Hills range. J Range Manage 38, 171176.
57Luginbuhl, JM, Pond, KR & Burns, JC (1990) Changes in ruminal and fecal particle weight distribution of steers fed coastal bermudagrass hay at four levels. J Anim Sci 68, 28642873.
58Kennedy, PM (1995) Intake and digestion in swamp buffaloes and cattle. 4. Particle size and buoyancy in relation to voluntary intake. J Agric Sci 124, 277287.
59Kovács, PL, Südekum, K-H & Stangassinger, M (1997) Rumen contents and ruminal and faecal particle size distribution in steers fed a mixed diet at three amounts of intake. Anim Feed Sci Technol 64, 143154.
60Lirette, A, Milligan, LP, Cyr, N, et al. (1990) Buoyancy separation of particles of forages, feces, and ruminal contents and nuclear magnetic resonance examination. Can J Anim Sci 70, 10991108.
61Sanson, GD (1989) Morphological adaptations of teeth to diets and feeding in the Macropodoidea. In Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat-kangaroos, pp. 151168 [Grigg, G, Jarman, P and Hume, I, editors]. Sydney: Surrey-Beatty.
62Nultsch, W (2000) Allgemeine Botanik (General Botany), 11th ed.Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
63Troelsen, JE & Campbell, JB (1968) Voluntary consumption of forage by sheep and its relation to the size and shape of particles in the digestive tract. Anim Prod 10, 289296.
64Spalinger, DE, Robbins, CT & Hanley, TA (1993) Adaptive rumen function in elk and mule deer. Can J Zool 71, 601610.
65Van Wieren, SE (1996) Nutrient extraction from mixed grass-browse diets by goats and sheep. In Digestive Strategies in Ruminants and Nonruminants, pp. 6780 [Van Wieren, SE, editor]. Thesis, Landbouw, University of Wageningen.
66Clauss, M, Lechner-Doll, M & Streich, WJ (2003) Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physicomechanical characteristics of forage. A reevaluation of an old debate and a new hypothesis. Oikos 102, 253262.
67Durkwa, LM (1983) Length and specific gravity of particles passed from the rumen and changes in ingesta specific gravity. PhD thesis, University of Vermont.
68Schwarm, A, Ortmann, S, Wolf, C, et al. (2009) No distinct difference in the excretion of large particles of varying size in a wild ruminant, the banteng (Bos javanicus). Eur J Wildl Res 55, 531533.
69McBride, BW, Milligan, LP & Turner, BV (1984) Endoscopic observations of digesta transfer from the reticulo-rumen to omasum of cattle. Can J Anim Sci 64, Suppl., 8485.
70Welch, JG (1967) Appetite control in sheep by indigestible fibers. J Anim Sci 26, 849854.
71Codron, D & Clauss, M (2010) Rumen physiology constrains diet niche: linking digestive physiology and food selection across wild ruminant species. Can J Zool 88, 11291138.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Nutrition
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • EISSN: 1475-2662
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed