Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T03:37:49.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON A QUESTION OF MORETÓ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2022

PING JIN
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, PR China e-mail: jinping@sxu.edu.cn
LEI WANG
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, PR China e-mail: wanglei0115@163.com
YONG YANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a family of counterexamples to a question proposed recently by Moretó concerning the character codegrees and the element orders of a finite solvable group.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

1 Introduction

Let G be a finite group, and write $\operatorname {\mathrm {Irr}}(G)$ to denote the set of irreducible complex characters of G. The concept of character codegree, originally defined as $|G|/\chi (1)$ for any nonlinear irreducible character $\chi $ of G, was introduced in [Reference Chillag and Herzog1] to characterise the structure of finite groups. However, a nonlinear character $\chi \in \mathrm {Irr}(G/N)$ , where N is a nontrivial normal subgroup of G, will have two different codegrees when it is considered as a character of G and of $G/N$ . To eliminate this inconvenience, Qian et al. in [Reference Qian, Wang and Wei9] redefined the codegree of an arbitrary character $\chi $ of G as

$$ \begin{align*}\chi^{c}(1)=|G:\operatorname{\mathrm{Ker}} \chi|/\chi(1).\end{align*} $$

Many properties of codegrees have been studied, including variations on Huppert’s $\rho $ - $\sigma $ conjecture, the relationship between codegrees and element orders, groups with few codegrees, and recognising simple groups using the codegree set.

The authors believe that among the above-mentioned results, the most interesting is the relation between codegrees and element orders (see [Reference Isaacs4, Reference Qian7, Reference Qian8]). Here we mention a result of Qian [Reference Qian7, Theorem 1.1] which says that if a finite solvable group G has an element g of square-free order, then G must have an irreducible character of codegree divisible by the order $o(g)$ of g. Isaacs [Reference Isaacs4] established the same result for an arbitrary finite group. Recently, Qian [Reference Qian8] strengthened his earlier result, showing that for every element g of a finite solvable group G, there necessarily exists some $\chi \in \text {Irr}(G)$ such that $o(g)$ divides $\chi ^{c}(1)$ .

Motivated by the results in [Reference Isaacs4, Reference Qian7, Reference Qian8], Moretó considered the converse relation of codegrees and element orders and proposed an interesting question [Reference Moretó6, Question B]. He also mentioned that counterexamples, if they exist, seem to be rare.

Question 1.1. Let G be a finite solvable group and let $\chi \in \operatorname {\mathrm {Irr}}(G)$ . Does there exist $g\in G$ such that $\pi (\,\chi ^{c}(1))\subseteq \pi (o(g))$ ? Here, $\pi (n)$ denotes the set of prime divisors of a positive integer n.

In this note, we will construct a family of examples to show that this question has a negative answer in general. For notation and terminology of character theory, we refer to [Reference Isaacs3].

2 Counterexamples

We begin with some facts about automorphisms of extra-special p-groups, which are more or less well-known but we give a complete proof for the reader’s convenience.

Theorem 2.1. For any distinct primes $p,r$ with $r>3$ , choose an extra-special p-group P of order $p^{2r+1}$ , such that P has exponent p if $p>2$ , and P is the central product of $r-1$ dihedral groups of order $8$ and a quaternion group if $p=2$ .

  1. (1) There exists a prime q dividing $p^{r}+1$ but not $p^{2}-1$ . In particular, r divides $q-1$ , so that the semi-direct product $C_{q}\rtimes C_{r}$ makes sense.

  2. (2) $\operatorname {\mathrm {Aut}}(P)$ contains a subgroup A, which acts trivially on $Z(P)$ and is isomorphic to $C_{q}\rtimes C_{r}$ .

Proof (1)By Zsigmondy’s prime theorem (see [Reference Huppert and Blackburn2, Theorem IX.8.3]) and the condition that $r>3$ , there exists a prime q dividing $p^{2r}-1$ but not $p^{i}-1$ for all ${i=1,\ldots , 2r-1}$ . It follows that $2r$ is the order of p modulo q, establishing (1).

(2) Write $S=\operatorname {\mathrm {Sp}}(2r,p)$ for $p>2$ and $S=\text {O}_{-}(2r,2)$ for $p=2$ . Let $\Lambda $ denote the subgroup of $\operatorname {\mathrm {Aut}}(P)$ consisting of those automorphisms of P acting trivially on $Z(P)$ . By the construction of P, it is well known that $\Lambda /\kern-1.5pt\operatorname{\mathrm {Inn}}(P)$ is isomorphic to S (see, for example, [Reference Winter10, Theorem 1]). Since the orders of $C_{q}\rtimes C_{r}$ and $\operatorname {\mathrm {Inn}}(P)$ are relatively prime (as p does not divide $qr$ ), it suffices to show that S contains a subgroup isomorphic to $C_{q}\rtimes C_{r}$ by the Schur–Zassenhaus theorem.

To do this, we consider the finite field ${\mathbb {F}}_{p^{2r}}$ of $p^{2r}$ elements and let $V={\mathbb {F}}_{p^{2r}}$ be the vector space over ${\mathbb {F}}_{p}$ of dimension $2r$ . We need to construct a nonsingular symplectic form $\langle \;, \rangle $ on V for $p>2$ and a nonsingular quadratic form Q on V for $p=2$ .

Fix an element $a\in {\mathbb {F}}_{p^{2}}-{\mathbb {F}}_{p}$ . Then $a\not \in {\mathbb {F}}_{p^{r}}$ since r is odd. Let $\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}:{\mathbb {F}}_{p^{r}}\to {\mathbb {F}}_{p}$ be the trace map. It is easy to see that

$$ \begin{align*}\langle v,w\rangle=\operatorname{\mathrm{tr}}((a-a^{p^{r}})(vw^{p^{r}}-v^{p^{r}}w)),\quad v,w\in V,\end{align*} $$

defines a nonsingular symplectic form on V and the corresponding symplectic group is S for $p>2$ (see [Reference Manz and Wolf5, Example 8.5]). When $p=2$ ,

$$ \begin{align*}Q(v)=\operatorname{\mathrm{tr}}(v^{1+p^{r}}),\quad v\in V,\end{align*} $$

defines a nonsingular quadratic form on V and the corresponding orthogonal group is $S=\text {O}_{-}(2r,2)$ .

Now, let $\Gamma _{0}(V)=\{v\mapsto av\ |\ 0\neq a\in V\}$ , consisting of multiplications, and let $\sigma :v\mapsto v^{p}$ be the Frobenius field automorphism of ${\mathbb {F}}_{p^{2r}}$ . Then $\sigma $ acts naturally on $\Gamma _{0}(V)$ , and we consider the corresponding semi-direct product $\Gamma _{0}(V)\rtimes \langle \sigma \rangle $ . Observe that $\Gamma _{0}(V)$ is cyclic of order $p^{2r}-1$ and the order of $\sigma $ is $2r$ . Recall that the prime q divides $p^{r}+1$ and let C be the unique subgroup of order q in $\Gamma _{0}(V)$ . It is clear that C is invariant under $\sigma $ , and furthermore, by elementary Galois theory, the fixed point of $\sigma ^{2}$ in C is trivial since q does not divide $p^{2}-1$ . So we can form the semi-direct product $C\rtimes \langle \sigma ^{2}\rangle $ , which is clearly isomorphic to $C_{q}\rtimes C_{r}$ . What remains is to show that $C\rtimes \langle \sigma ^{2}\rangle \le S$ .

A simple calculation shows that both the symplectic form $\langle \; ,\;\rangle $ and the quadratic form Q defined above are preserved by the map on V induced by multiplication by an element of order $p^{r}+1$ , and thus the unique cyclic subgroup of $\Gamma _{0}(V)$ of order $p^{r}+1$ must be contained in S. In particular, we have $C\le S$ . To prove $\sigma ^{2}\in S$ , we distinguish two cases. For $p=2$ , since the Galois group of ${\mathbb {F}}_{p^{r}}/{\mathbb {F}}_{p}$ can be identified with $\langle \sigma ^{2}\rangle $ (as r is odd), we conclude that $\sigma ^{2}$ must preserve the trace map from ${\mathbb {F}}_{p^{r}}$ to ${\mathbb {F}}_{p}$ and hence lies in S. For $p>2$ , we need to establish that $\langle v^{\sigma ^{2}},w^{\sigma ^{2}}\rangle =\langle v,w\rangle $ for all $v,w\in V$ . Let $b=a-a^{p^{r}}$ and $x=vw^{p^{r}}-v^{p^{r}}w$ . It suffices to prove $\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}(bx^{\sigma ^{2}})=\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}(bx)$ . Since $(bx)^{p^{r}}=(-b)(-x)=bx$ , we have $bx\in {\mathbb {F}}_{p^{r}}$ . It follows that $\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}((bx)^{\sigma ^{2}})=\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}(bx)$ . By the choice of a, we know that $b\in {\mathbb {F}}_{p^{2}}$ and hence b is fixed by $\sigma ^{2}$ . Thus, $\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}(bx^{\sigma ^{2}})=\operatorname {\mathrm {tr}}(bx)$ and $\sigma ^{2}\in S$ , as required.

As an application of Theorem 2.1, we can now construct a family of counterexamples to Moretó’s question.

Example 2.2. In the notation of Theorem 2.1, let $G=P\rtimes A$ be the corresponding semi-direct product, so that G is solvable. Then there exists an irreducible character $\chi $ of G such that $\chi ^{c}(1)=p^{r+1}qr$ but G contains no element of order divisible by $pqr$ .

Proof. Note that $Z(P)$ is cyclic of order p, and thus we can choose a faithful linear character $\lambda $ of $Z(P)$ . Then it is well known that $\lambda ^{P}=p^{r}\theta $ for some $\theta \in \operatorname {\mathrm {Irr}}(P)$ . Since A acts trivially on $Z(P)$ , it fixes $\lambda $ and hence $\theta $ is A-invariant. It follows that $\theta $ extends to some $\chi \in \operatorname {\mathrm {Irr}}(G)$ by Gallagher’s theorem (see [Reference Isaacs3, Corollary 6.28]), so that $\chi (1)=\theta (1)=p^{r}$ . Also, let B be the unique subgroup of A of order q. Then $P/Z(P)$ is irreducible as an ${\mathbb {F}}_{p}[B]$ -module because $|P/Z(P)|=p^{2r}$ and the order of p modulo q is exactly $2r$ . From this, we conclude that $Z(P)$ is the unique minimal normal subgroup of G, and since $\theta $ is faithful, we have $\operatorname {\mathrm {Ker}}\chi \cap P=\operatorname {\mathrm {Ker}}\theta =1$ . Obviously, P is the Fitting subgroup of the solvable group G, and thus $\operatorname {\mathrm {Ker}}\chi $ contains no minimal normal subgroup of G, which forces $\operatorname {\mathrm {Ker}}\chi =1$ . Therefore, we have $\chi ^{c}(1)=|G|/\chi (1)=p^{r+1}qr$ .

Finally, if G has an element of order divisible by all the primes $p, q, r$ , then A contains an element of order $qr$ and thus A is cyclic, which is not the case by the choice of primes $q, r$ . The proof is now complete.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the referee for the valuable suggestions which greatly improved the manuscript.

Footnotes

This work was supported by NSFC (Grant No. 12171289) and a grant from the Simons Foundation (No. 499532).

References

Chillag, D. and Herzog, M., ‘On character degrees quotients’, Arch. Math. 55 (1989), 2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, B. and Blackburn, N., Finite Groups II (Springer, Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, I. M., Character Theory of Finite Groups (Academic Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Isaacs, I. M., ‘Element orders and character codegrees’, Arch. Math. 97 (2011), 499501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, O. and Wolf, T. R., Representations of Solvable Groups, London Mathematical Society, Lecture Notes Series, 185 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretó, A., ‘Huppert’s conjecture for character codegrees’, Math. Nachr. 294 (2021), 22322236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, G., ‘A note on element orders and character codegrees’, Arch. Math. 95 (2011), 101200.Google Scholar
Qian, G., ‘Element orders and character codegrees’, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), 820824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, G., Wang, Y. and Wei, H., ‘Co-degrees of irreducible characters in finite groups’, J. Algebra 312 (2007), 946955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, D. L., ‘The automorphism group of an extraspecial $p$ -group’, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 2 (1972), 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar